3a-ol 1 reacts with tryptophan in the presence of Lewis acids
to form 2,2′-biindole cross-links.7 In theory, the heterocyclic
moiety of madindoline could react with either tryptophan or
cysteine side chains.
covalent bond formation has been proposed to account for
the high potency of tetramethrin toward insect ion channels.10
The alkyl substituents on the cyclopent-4-ene-1,3-dione
moiety of madindoline should slow the rate of Michael
addition, conferring the selectivity observed in the biological
studies.
Billington and co-workers have shown that cyclopent-4-
ene-1,3-diones, close analogues of maleimides, also react
rapidly in high yield with N-acetylcysteine at pH 7.4 (Scheme
1).11 However, based on analogy to studies of maleimides,
it is expected that the methyl and butyl substituents of
madindoline should slow thiol addition.
Scheme 1. Precedent for the Thiophilicity of Madindoline
Subunits
To test the potential thiophilicity of the madindoline
cyclopentene unit, a symmeterical analogue was needed that
would simplify the studies with thiols. The Moore azi-
doquinone ring contraction offers an ideal approach to these
analogues.12 The mechanism of the Moore rearrangement
(Scheme 3) is believed to involve formation of a zwitterionic
acylium-enolate that rapidly cyclizes.
Scheme 3. Mechanism of the Moore Reaction
Under acidic conditions indoline 1 condenses with N-
acetylcysteamine to produce the adduct 2 in 57% yield
(Scheme 2). Water competes with the thiol so the corre-
sponding oxindole was also isolated in 31% yield. The
Savige-Fontana reaction of indoline 1 does not proceed at
an appreciable rate at pH 7.4, consistent with the highly
specific biological profile of madindoline.
The symmetrical dione 613 was constructed using the
Moore azidoquinone ring contraction (Scheme 4). In theory
the Moore rearrangement could proceed in situ during the
azide substitution reaction. However, the addition-elimina-
tion with sodium azide was most effective in alcoholic
solvents, whereas the Moore rearrangement was most ef-
fective in nonpolar, nonnucleophilic solvents. Since the
azidoquinone deflagrates on heating it was carried directly
to the rearrangement without separation from unreacted
starting material.
Scheme 2. Savige-Fontana Reaction of Indoline 1
When madindoline model 6 was treated with 1 equiv of
N-acetylcysteamine, the thiol adduct 8 was formed in 15%
yield (as an inseparable mixture of diastereomers) along with
starting material and other products (Scheme 5). However,
the more complete model 7 failed to form thiol adducts, even
when heated. Thus, all three alkyl substituents on madin-
doline conspire to inhibit nonspecific Michael addition by
thiols.
N-Alkylmaleimides exhibit exceptional reactivity and
selectivity toward protein thiols. Miyadera has compared the
reactivity of N-ethylmaleimide with its 3,4-dimethyl analogue
and shown that the extra methyl groups slow the brisk
reaction rate by over 5 orders of magnitude.8 While the rates
are undoubtedly slowed, 3,4-dialkylmaleimides still form
cysteine9 and glutathione10 adducts under physiological
conditions. Substituents on the 3 and 4 positions of the
maleimide tetramethrin destabilize 1,4-thiol adducts, yet
(9) Tressl, R.; Wondrak, G.; Kersten, E.; Rewicki, D. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 1994, 42, 2692-7.
(10) Smith, I. H.; Wood, E. J.; Casida, J. E. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982,
30, 598-600.
(11) Billington, S.; Mann, J.; Quazi, P.; Alexander, R.; Eaton, M. A.
W.; Millar, K.; Millican, A. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 5231-6.
(12) (a) Moore, H. W.; Shelden, H. R. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 4019-
24. (b) Moore, H. W.; Weyler, W., Jr.; Shelden, H. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1969, 3947-50. (c) Weyler, W., Jr.; Pearce, D. S.; Moore, H. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 2603-10. (d) Hamdan, A. J.; Moore, H. W.
Heterocycles 1989, 29, 51-6.
(13) Cyclopent-4-ene-1,3-diones have been broadly patented for fragrance
applications; dione 7 lacks fragrant properties. Isaac, B. O.; Chan, C. O.;
Marr, I. M. U.S. Patent 5,407,910, 1995.
(6) (a) Savige, W. E.; Fontana, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976,
600-1. (b) Savige, W. E.; Fontana, A. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1980, 15,
102-12. (c) Wieland, T. B., B.; Zanotti, G. Chem. Pept. Proteins 1989, 4,
95-100.
(7) Saito, I.; Morii, T.; Matsugo, S.; Matsuura, T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1982, 977-9.
(8) Miyadera, T.; Kosower, E. M.; Kosower, N. S. J. Med. Chem. 1971,
14.
2338
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 14, 2002