E. V. Sergee6a et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1121–1123
1123
Relying on the established relative configurations for
References
meso-10 and 11 and chiral 13 we assume that the planar
chiral [2.2]paracyclophane moiety plays a key role in
the stereochemical outcome of the reaction. Thus, if the
activated imine fragment of compounds 4–7 react in
anti conformation to the nearest ethylene bridge, the
Si-site (for the (Rp)-enantiomer) or Re-site (for the
(Sp)-enantiomer) should not be shielded by the protons
of the unsubstituted [2.2]paracyclophane ring. Coupling
between paracyclophanyl fragments with opposite
configurations, i.e. (Rp)- and (Sp), should lead to the
meso-diastereomer with (Rp,S,R,Sp)-configuration,
which was unequivocally established for 10 and 11,
whereas the coupling of two paracyclophanyl fragments
with the same absolute configuration should give rise to
the (Rp,S,S,Rp)- or (Sp,R,R,Sp)-diamines. At the
same time the X-ray structure of the imine 85 bearing
an ortho-substituent reveals that now the more prefer-
able conformation of the imine fragment is the one with
the N-Ph substituent in syn-orientation to the ethylene
bridge, due to the repulsive interaction with the OCH3
group. Thus, the stereochemical outcome of the cou-
pling reaction should be opposite to that observed for
the reaction of the imines 4–7. However, for the imine
8 (and hence for the diamine 13) the configuration of
the planar chiral [2.2]paracyclophane fragment changes
because of the nomenclature priority of the OCH3
group over the imino group. Hence the coupling of
paracyclophanyl fragments having opposite configura-
tions should give (Rp,S,R,Sp)-13, whereas the coupling
of two paracyclophanes with the same configurations
should afford (Rp,S,S,Rp)-/(Sp,R,R,Sp)-13.
1. (a) Rozenberg, V.; Danilova, T.; Sergeeva, E.; Vorontsov,
E.; Starikova, Z.; Lysenko, K.; Belokon’, Yu. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 3295–3303 and references cited therein;
(b) Hopf, H.; Barrett, D. G. Liebigs Ann. 1995, 449–451.
2. Banfi, S.; Manfredi, A.; Montanari, F.; Pozzi, G.; Quici,
S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1996, 113, 77–86.
3. Rozenberg, V.; Danilova, T.; Sergeeva, E.; Vorontsov,
E.; Starikova, Z.; Korlyukov, A.; Hopf, H. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 468–477.
4. Shimuzi, M.; Iida, T.; Fujisawa, T. Chem. Lett. 1995,
609–610.
5. Crystallographic data for the diamines 8, 10 and 11 are
available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Center, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK,
e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk; the CCDC numbers are
185284, 185285 and 185286, respectively.
6. For similar regularities in the pinacol coupling of racemic
and enantiomerically pure planar chiral (benz-
aldimine)Cr(CO)3, see: Taniguchi, N.; Uemura, M. Tet-
rahedron 1998, 54, 12775–12788.
7. (Rp,S,S,Rp)-9: Mp 125–126.5°C.—C46H44N2 (624.87)
calcd: C, 88.42; H, 7.10; N, 4.48; found: C, 88.49; H,
7.39; N, 4.04%.—1H NMR (C6D6): l=2.30–2.40 (m,
2H), 2.60–2.90 (m, 12H), 3.35–3.44 (m, 2H), 4.13 (d,
3
3J=9.35 Hz, 2H, 2CH), 5.20 (d, J=9.35 Hz, 2H, 2NH),
5.53 (s, 2H), 6.10 (d, 3J=7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.24–6.53 (m,
10H), 6.88 (m, 2H), 6.98 (m, 4H), 7.30 (m, 4H).—13C
NMR (CDCl3): l=34.19, 34.96, 35.21 (2C), 56.62, 113.12
(2C), 117.60, 129.80 (2C), 131.05, 131.84, 132.09, 132.16,
132.23, 132.65, 134.41, 135.47, 137.28, 138.75, 139.01,
139.11, 147.74.—MS (70 eV); m/z (%): 312 (49) [M+/2].
8. (Rp,S,S,Rp)-12: Mp 109.5–112°C.—C48H48N2O2 (684.92)
calcd: C, 84.17; H, 7.06; N, 4.09; found: C, 83.97; H,
7.39; N, 3.84%.—1H NMR (CDCl3): l=2.15–2.27 (m,
2H), 2.56–2.67 (m, 2H), 2.72–2.82 (m, 2H), 2.84–2.98 (m,
6H), 3.04–3.25 (m, 4H), 3.74 (s, 6H, 2OCH3), 3.84 (br.s,
2H, 2CH), 4.94 (br.s, 2H, 2NH), 5.32 (s, 2H), 5.60 (s,
2H), 5.99 (d, 2H), 6.25 (d, 2H), 6.36 (d, 2H), 6.65 (d, 2H),
6.78–6.87 (m, 6H), 7.28–7.36 (m, 4H).—13C NMR
(CDCl3): 31.61, 33.35, 33.76, 34.75, 54.10, 55.85, 113.24
(2C), 117.34, 117.48, 126.08, 128.00, 128.06, 129.75 (3C),
130.58, 132.35, 132.72, 133.35, 138.07, 139.27, 139.71,
147.85, 156.41.—MS (70 eV); m/z (%): 342 (16) [M+/2].
9. (Rp,S,S,Rp)-13: Mp 227.5–229°C.—C48H48N2O2 (684.92)
calcd: C, 84.17; H, 7.06; N, 4.09; found: C, 84.27; H,
7.20; N, 4.13%.—1H NMR (CDCl3): l=2.45–2.58 (m,
2H), 2.65–2.79 (m, 4H), 2.83–2.96 (m, 4H), 2.98–3.06 (m,
2H), 3.07–3.16 (m, 4H), 3.43 (s, 6H, 2OCH3), 4.75 (br.d,
2H, 2CH), 6.08 (d, 2H, 2NH), 6.12–6.20 (m, 4H), 6.29 (d,
2H), 6.42 (d, 2H), 6.47 (d, 2H), 6.53 (d, 2H), 6.60–6.70
(m, 6H), 7.15–7.25 (m, 4H).—13C NMR (CDCl3): 32.49,
34.66, 34.88, 34.96, 61.16, 61.87, 112.30 (2C), 116.01,
129.17, 129.35, 129.75 (2C), 130.70, 131.10, 131.87,
132.61, 132.83, 135.63, 138.98, 139.31, 140.76, 149.35,
159.56.—MS (70 eV); m/z (%): 342 (20) [M+/2].
In conclusion, the pinacol coupling of the enantiomeri-
cally pure planar chiral N-aryl substituted imines of
[2.2]paracyclophane occurs stereoselectively giving rise
to diastereomerically pure diamines. Coupling of the
racemic imines produces a mixture of the single racemic
dl- and single meso-diamines. The newly synthesized
chiral compounds can be regarded as potential chiral
ligands in a wide range of stereoselective reactions
proceeding with participation of chiral diamines.10 The
scope of the application of the pinacol coupling to the
synthesis of other [2.2]paracyclophane based diamines
(N-unsubstituted or N-alkyl substituted), diols and
amino alcohols possessing planar and central chirality
applying either the Zn–sulfonic acid system or other
classical reagents (such as Sm and low valent Ti deriva-
tives, etc.) is now in progress.
Acknowledgements
Financial support of this work by Russian Science
Foundation (00-03-32683a and 00-03-32807a) is grate-
fully acknowledged.
10. Bennani, Y. L.; Hanessian, S. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97,
3161–3195.