3758
M. T. Patil et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 3756–3758
and crystallographic data for compound 9) associated with this
article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ii
i
TsO
O
TsO
TsO
OH
TsO
OH
TsO
TsO
22
OH
References and notes
23
21
1. (a) Thomas, J. R.; Dwek, R. A.; Rademacher, T. W. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 5413–
5422; (b) Billington, D. C. The Inositol Phosphates: Chemical Synthesis and
Biological Significance; VCH: New York, 1993; (c) Potter, B. V. L.; Lampe, D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl, 1995, 34, 1933–1972; (d) Bruzik, K. S. (Ed.),
Phosphoinositides: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Biomedical Applications, ACS
symposium series 718; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA,
1999; (e) Dalko, P. I.; Sinaÿ, P. In Organic Synthesis Highlights V; Schmalz, H.-G.,
Wirth, T., Eds.; Wiley-VCH GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003; pp 1–14; (f)
Schedler, D. J. A.; Baker, D. C. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1585–1595.
2. (a) Steiner, T.; Hinrichs, W.; Saenger, W.; Gigg, R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1993,
49, 708–718; (b) Gonnade, R. G.; Shashidhar, M. S.; Bhadbhade, M. M. J. Indian
Inst. Sci. 2007, 87, 149–165; (c) Murali, C.; Gonnade, R. G.; Shashidhar, M. S.;
Bhadbhade, M. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 261–269.
O
O
O
O
O
iii
iv
TsO
HO
14
OMe
OMe
OMe
TsO
HO
25
OMe
24
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) DMSO, (COCl)2, DCM, Et3N, À78 °C, 82%; (ii)
DMF, Ag2O, MeI, rt, 24 h, 92%; (iii) NaOMe, MeOH, reflux, 12 h, 75%; (iv) TFA–H2O,
rt, 24 h, 99%.
3. (a) Gauthier, D. R.; Bender, S. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 13–16; (b) Chida, N.;
Ogawa, S. Chem. Commun. 1997, 807–813; (c) Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, S. T.; Yamada,
I.; Koashi, Y.; Yamada, K.; Chida, N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2874–2880; (d)
Sureshan, K. M.; Shashidhar, M. S.; Praveen, T.; Das, T. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
4477–4504; (e) Sato, K.; Akai, S.; Sugita, N.; Ohsawa, T.; Kogure, T.; Shoji, H.;
Yoshimura, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7496–7504; (f) Li, M.; Wu, A.; Zhou, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3707–3710; (g) Sureshan, K. M.; Murakami, T.;
Watanabe, Y. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3998–4006.
4. (a) Anderson, R. C.; Wallis, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 2931–2935; (b)
Angyal, S. J.; McHugh, D. J. J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 3682–3691; (c) Kowarski, C. R.;
Sarel, S. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 117–119; (d) Gigg, J.; Gigg, R. Carbohydr. Res.
1997, 299, 77–83; (e) Takahashi, H.; Kittaka, H.; Ikegami, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 9707–9710; (f) Chung, S.-K.; Kwon, Y.-U. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1999, 9, 2135–2140; (g) Pistara, V.; Barili, P. L.; Catelani, G.; Corsaro, A.;
D’Andrea, F.; Fisichella, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3253–3256; (h) Takahashi,
H.; Kittaka, H.; Ikegami, S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 2705–2716; (i) Kwon, Y.-U.;
Lee, C.; Chung, S.-K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3327–3338; (j) Vitelio, C.; Bellomo,
A.; Brovett, M.; Seoane, G.; Gonzalez, D. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1773–1778;
(k) Jagdhane, R. C.; Shashidhar, M. S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2945–2953.
5. Murali, C.; Shashidhar, M. S.; Gopinath, C. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 4149–4155.
6. Shaldubina, S.; Ju, D. L.; Vaden, D.; Ding, R. H.; Belmaker, H. M. L. Greenberg Mol.
Psychiatry 2002, 7, 174–180.
conditions is seldom encountered in the literature. The ease of for-
mation of the gem-diol 23 (and the acetal 24) is perhaps due to the
rigid trioxaadamantane frame-work in which presence of a sp2 car-
bon induces strain. The rigid trioxaadamantane frame-work also
facilitates the removal of the tosylates by S–O bond cleavage, since
nucleophilic substitution on the corresponding carbon (which is a
part of the rigid frame-work) is not possible.
In conclusion we have reported a method for the facile synthe-
sis of epi-inositol 13 involving the following novel features: highly
stereoselective reduction of the protected epi-inosose 10; use of
reaction sequence in which each step gives a single product with
excellent yields; delineation of the role of the protecting group in
the selective reduction of a ketone; and the use of tosylate as a hy-
droxyl protecting group.
Acknowledgments
7. (a) Einat, H.; Elkabaz-Shwortz, Z.; Cohen, H.; Kofman, O.; Belmaker, R. H. Int. J.
Neuropsychopharmacology 1998, 1, 31–34; (b) Belmaker, R. H.; Agam, G.; Van
Calker, D.; Richards, M. H.; Kofman, O. Neuropsychopharmacology 1998, 19,
220–232; (c) Williams, R. S.; Cheng, L.; Mudge, A. W.; Harwood, A. J. Nature
2002, 417, 292–295.
The Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi sup-
ported this work. M.T.P., S.K. and M.P.S. are recipients of Senior Re-
search Fellowships of the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research, New Delhi.
8. Mukherjee, R.; Axt, E. M. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2682–2684.
9. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures in this
paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as
supplementary publication nos. CCDC code 816954.
Supplementary data
10. Sureshan, K. M.; Shashidhar, M. S.; Praveen, T.; Gonnade, R. G.; Bhadbhade, M.
M. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 2399–2410.
Supplementary data (experimental procedures for compounds
4, 7–12, 14, 24, and 25, along with all data for all new compounds