ity (â:R > 98: 2).17 This example further confirms that
TBSOTf is superior to TMSOTf for the glycosidation
reactions of sensitive substrates.2b,5,18 However, to achieve
a synthetically useful glycosidation procedure with aldol
acceptors, it was clear that almost neutral activation condi-
tions of the donor would be required.19
of hemiacetals to the glycosyl fluoride 14 by using DAST23
proceeded in 78% yield and excellent anomeric stereoselec-
tivity (â:R > 98: 2). The configuration of the anomeric center
was determined by measurement of the coupling constant
(J1-2 ) 8.4 Hz)17 after desilylation (HF‚NEt3, CH3CN, 60
°C).24 Donor 14 is relatively stable and could be stored at
-20 °C for more than two weeks without any noticeable
decomposition.
We anticipated that a donor combining a C(2)-iodo
substituent, which we have shown to be a very efficient
â-directing group,4,5 with an anomeric fluoride leaving group
might help to circumvent the stability problems noted above.
2-Iodo-2-deoxy glycosyl fluorides were first reported by
Wood et al. in 1966,20 and have continued to be targets of
methodological studies for the past 30 years.21 However, only
one report of glycosidation reactions involving this class of
donor has been disclosed, in which cyclohexanol was used
as the acceptor.22 Therefore, we decided to explore the
potential of 2-iodo-2-deoxy-â-glycosyl fluorides in the
glycosidation reactions of â-hydroxy ketones.
With the glycosyl donor 14 in hand, we turned our
attention toward the glycosidation reaction of the â-hydroxy
ketone 12. To our delight, slow addition of donor 14 to a
solution of â-hydroxy ketone 12, stannous chloride, and silver
perchlorate in diethyl ether at -15 °C according to
Mukaiyama’s general procedure10 provided the coupled
product 13 in 65% yield with excellent stereoselectivity (â:R
> 98: 2)17 (Scheme 4). Silver triflate proved equally effective
2-Iodo-2-deoxy-glycosyl fluorides are easily prepared in
two steps starting from the corresponding 2-iodo-2-deoxy-
â-glycosyl acetate (Scheme 3). For the present purposes, we
Scheme 4. Glycosidation Reactions of
2-Iodo-2-deoxy-â-glycosyl Fluoride 14 and Aldols 12 and 16
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-Iodo-2-deoxy-â-glycosyl Fluoride
14
elected to use the readily accessible glycosyl acetate 54 as
starting material. Use of a substrate with a C(6)-bromo
substituent simplifies the overall synthetic sequence, in that
the C(2)-iodo and C(6)-bromo substituents can be reduced
in the same step to give the targeted 2,6-dideoxy-â-glycosides
(vide infra). Thus, cleavage of the anomeric acetate unit of
5 with hydrazine followed by transformation of the mixture
as the activating agent (58% isolated yield of 13) whereas
addition of a base (2,6-lutidine)25 led to a lower yield (24%).
Other promoters (AgClO4/Cp2HfCl2,26 AgClO4/Cp2ZrCl2,27
AgSbF6/SnCl2) or incorporation of a more labile protecting
group on the aldol acceptor (TES instead of TBS ether)
resulted in unsuccessful glycosidation reactions. More elabo-
rated â-hydroxy ketones (e.g., 16) can also be glycosylated
with the 2-iodo-2-deoxy-â-glycosyl fluoride 14 in very good
yield and selectivity (84%, â:R > 98: 2).17 Reductive removal
of the C(2)-iodo and the C(6)-bromo substituents under mild
conditions6 led to the desired 2-deoxy-glycoside units 15 and
18 in 72% and 90%, respectively.
(13) Lee, J.; Coward, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4126.
(14) Nagai, H.; Matsumura, S.; Toshima, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
847.
(15) Waldmann, H.; Bo¨hm, G.; Schmid, U.; Ro¨ttele, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1944.
(16) Lubineau, A.; Drouillat, B. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1997, 16, 1179.
(17) Determined by 500-MHz 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction
mixture.
(18) Roush, W. R.; Narayan, S. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 899.
(19) Activation of a glycal donor in the presence of 12 was also
attempted, but none of the literature methods examined (e.g., PPh3‚HBr,
NBS) led to formation of the â-glycoside product. The acceptor was
recovered in these cases. PPh3‚HBr actiVation: Bolitt, V.; Mioskowski,
C.; Lee, S.-G.; Falck, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5812. NBS actiVation:
Toshima, K.; Tatsuta, K.; Kinoshita, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1988, 61,
2369.
(20) Wood, K. R.; Kent, P. W.; Fisher, D. J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1966, 912.
(21) (a) Evans, R. D.; Schauble, J. H. Synthesis 1987, 551. (b) Campbell,
J. C.; Dwek, R. A.; Kent, P. W.; Prout, C. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1969, 10,
71. (c) Hall, L. D.; Manville, J. F. Can. J. Chem. 1969, 47, 361. (d) Hall,
L. D.; Manville, J. F. Carbohydr. Res. 1968, 8, 295. (e) Hall, L. D.; Manville,
J. F. Chem. Commun. 1968, 35, 37.
(23) (a) Rosenbrook, Wm., Jr.; Riley, D. A.; Lartey, P. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1985, 26, 3. (b) Posner, G. H.; Haines, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985,
26, 5.
(24) Determination of the anomeric configuration of 14 by measurement
of the J1,2 coupling constant was not possible since this donor exists in a
twist-boat conformation to relieve the gauche interactions between the two
bulky silyl ethers at C3 and C4.
(25) Nicolaou, K. C.; Caulfield, T.; Kataoka, H.; Kumazawa, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7910.
(26) Suzuki, K.; Maeta, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Tsuchihashi, G.-i. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3571.
(22) Nishimura, S.; Washitani, K. (Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.,
Japan), Stereoselective Production of Glycosyl Compound, Japanese Patent
09241288, 1997.
(27) Matsumoto, T.; Maeta, H.; Suzuki, K.; Tsuchihashi, G.-i. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3567.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 1, 2003
83