H. Foks et al. / Il Farmaco 60 (2005) 513–517
517
[3] K. Kigasawa, M. Hiiragi, K. Wahisaka, O. Kusama, H. Sugi,
K. Kawasaki, 2-Alkyl-6,9-dihydro-9-oxo-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-f]quino-
line-8-carboxylic acids and their esters, CA 90 (1979) 204090x
(1978 Jpn 78,119,895).
[4] H.E. Hoffman, D.R. Rayner, N-(Benzothienopyrazol)amide antirhi-
noviral agents, CA 90 (1979) 204093a (1979 US 4,140,785).
[5] H. Kawakubo, K. Fukuzaki, T. Sone, Studies on 3-aminoindazoles. I.
Synthesis of 1-or 3-(substituted 3-amino)indazoles, Chem. Pharm.
Bull. (Tokyo) 35 (1987) 2292–2299.
[6] J. Roch, E. Mueller, B. Narr, J. Nickl, W. Haarmann, 1H-Pyra-
zolo[3,4-b]pyridines, CA 89 (1978) 6322r (1978 Ger. Offen.
2,643,753).
[7] L. Kuczyn´ski, A. Mrozikiewicz, W. Banaszkiewicz, K. PorVba, Syn-
thesis and biological activity of pyrazo-[3,4-b]-pyridine derivatives.
Part I, Pol. J. Pharmacol. Pharm. 31 (1979) 217–225.
[8] B.M. Lynch, I. Chu, Synthesis and biological evaluation of xanthine
oxidase inhibitors. Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines and pyrazolo[3,4-
b]pyridines, J. Med. Chem. 18 (1975) 161–164.
[9] B.M. Lynch, M.A. Khan, H.C. Teo, F. Predotti, Pyrazolo[3,4-
b]pyridines: synthesis, reactions, and nuclear magnetic resonance
spectra, Can. J. Chem. 66 (1988) 420–428.
[10] D. Pancechowska-Ksepko, H. Foks, M. Janowiec, Z. Zwolska-Kwiek,
Studies on pyrazine derivatives. XXII. Synthesis and tuberculostatic
activity of products of reactions of pyrazinyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-
thione with amines, Acta Polon. Pharm. 49 (1988) 193–200.
[11] A. Balows, H.J. Hausler, K.L. Herrmann, H.D. Isenberg,
H.J. Shadomy, Manual of Clinical Microbiology, fifth ed, Am. Soc.
Microbiol, Washington, 1991.
Compound 5 inhibited growth of three (12%) strains in
low concentrations 12.5–25 µg/ml. The remaining 22 (88%)
strains required for growth inhibition the use of concentra-
tions ≥ 200 µg/ml. MIC value for seven (25%) strains was
200 µg/ml.
All the derivatives evaluated were more active towards the
tested Gram-positive microbes. The strains of Gram-positive
rod-bacteria from Propionobacterium granulosum genus were
more sensitive to the derivatives tested than to metronidazol.
The growth of above-mentioned bacteria was inhibited by
concentrations of the derivatives 5 and 6 within the limits
25–200 µg/ml, while by 1 within 12.5–200 µg/ml. The nec-
essary metronidazol concentrations were ≥ 200 µg/ml. The
tested strains of Gram-positive granulosum anaerobes were
susceptible to metronidazol in concentrations ≤ 6.2 µg/ml,
which is consistent to the results reported by other authors
[13,17,18]. However, the lower in comparison with ours
—susceptibility results were obtained by Goldstein et al. [15],
Hoellman et al. [16] and Wexler et al. [20] (MICs for 90%
strains were 0.25–2.0 µg/ml). From among the derivatives
tested the highest activity towards the strains from Peptostrep-
tococcus gen. was shown by compound 6, which inhibited
growth of three (60%) strains in concentrations from 12.5 to
25 µg/ml.
[12] E.J. Baron, S.M. Finegold, Bailey and Scotts Diagnostics Microbiol-
ogy, eighth ed, C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1990.
[13] K.E. Aldridge, D. Ashcraft, K. Cambre, C.L. Pierson, S.G. Jenkins,
J.E. Rosenblatt, Multicenter Survey of the changing in vitro antimi-
crobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates of Bacteroides Fragilis
group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas and Peptostrepto-
coccus species, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 4 (45) (2001) 1238–
1243.
[14] D.M. Citron, M.D. Appleman, Comparative in vitro activities of
Trovafloxacin (CP-99,219) against 221 aerobic and 217 anaerobic
bacteria isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections, Anti-
microb. Agents Chemother 10 (41) (1997) 2312–2316.
From Gram-negative rod-bacteria, the comparable suscep-
tibility to metronidazol and two derivatives tested was exhib-
ited by the strain from Porphyromonas loescheii gen. The
growth inhibiting metronidazol concentration for this strain
was 6.2 µg/ml, while that of derivatives 1 and 5 –12.5 µg/ml:
• the three derivatives evaluated 1, 5, and 6 showed the dif-
ferentiated activity towards anaerobic bacteria;
• the highest activity towards Gram-negative microbes was
shown by derivative 6;
• all the derivatives evaluated showed higher activity towards
the Gram-positive anaerobes;
[15] C.J.E. Goldstein, D.M. Citron, C.V. Merriam, K. Tyrrell, Y. Warren,
Activities of Gemifloxacin (SB 265805, LB 20304) compared to those
of other oral antimicrobial agents against unusual anaerobes, Antimi-
crobial. Agents Chemother 11 (43) (1999) 2726–2730.
• the aerobic bacteria tested showed no susceptibility towards
derivatives 1, 5, 6 within the limits of concentrations used.
[16] D.B. Hoellman, L.M. Kelly, M.R. Jacobs, P.C. Appelbaum, Compara-
tive antianaerobic activity of BMS 284756, Antimicrobial. Agents
Chemother 2 (45) (2001) 589–592.
[17] J. Oteo, B. Aracil, J.I. Alos, J.L. Gomez-Garces, High prevalence of
resistance to clindamicin in Bacteroides fragilis group isolates, J.
Antimicrob. Chemother. 45 (2000) 691–693.
[18] E. Sillerstrom, E. Wahlund, C.E. Nord, In vitro activity of ATB-
773 against anaerobic bacteria, Eur. J. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19
(2000) 635–637.
[19] K. Tanaka, N. Kato, K. Watanabe, In vitro activity of an evernimicin
derivative, SCH27899, against anaerobic bacteria and Propionibacte-
rium acnes, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46 (2000) 465–469.
[20] H.M. Wexler, D. Molitoris, S.M. Finegold, In vitro activity of Gati-
floxacin against 238 strains anaerobic bacteria, Anaerobe 7 (2001)
285–289.
References
[1] D.B.R. Johnston, N-[(5-Halo-2,6-(substituted)pyrazinyl)methylene]-
amine antimicrobial compounds, compositions and use, CA 101
(1984) 72758e (1982 US 4,442,095 1982).
[2] D. Raffa, G. Daidone, B. Maggio, D. Schillaci, F. Plescia, Synthesis
and antiproliferative activity of novel 3-(indazol-3-yl)-quinazolin-4-
(3H)-one and 3-(indazol-3-yl)-benzotriazin-4(3H)-one derivatives,
Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 332 (1999) 317–320.