JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
ARTICLE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
REFERENCES AND NOTES
at which HPPS 5% weight loss is observed (Td,5%), compared
with the bisphenol-A analogue and polyether and polyester
comparatives (TGA curves are supplied in Supporting Infor-
mation). Along with the substantial retarding effect of sul-
fone on thermal degradation, the 5% degradation
temperature also shows that higher molecular weight poly-
propylene oxide polyols possess greater thermal stability
than lower molecular weight homologs, which complicates
quantitative estimation of the effect of sulfone moiety by this
measurement technique.
1 A. Morgan, C. WIlkie, Non-Halogenated Flame Retardant
Handbook; Wiley-Scrivener: Hoboken, NJ, 2014.
2 T. Hull, R. Law, A. Bergman, In Polymer Green Flame Retard-
ants; C. Papaspyrides, P. Kiliaris, Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
2014, pp 119–180.
3 Y. Wang, Y. Xia, S. Luo, Makromol. Chem. Macromol. Symp.
1993, 74, 295–298.
4 M. Sonnenschein, Polyurethanes: Science Technology, Mar-
kets, and Trends; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2014.
5 R. Yang, W. Hu, Y. Song, J. Li, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2015,
122, 102–109.
In Figure 2, the cumulative total ion current (CTIC) EGA/
MS23 from sulfone polyols, HPPA, polyester polyol (IP-9001)
and PPG (425 g/mol) heated 20 8C/min from 50 8C to
650 8C is shown. In agreement with the TGA and pyrolysis
results, the polyester polyol, PPG and HPPA-based polyols
are observed to degrade at lower temperatures compared
with the sulfone polyols. The IP-9001 aromatic polyester pol-
yol exhibits three distinct degradation events corresponding
to the polyether and aromatic components produced via con-
densation polymerization.24 Differences among the three
HPPS polyols were observed and are likely due to the inter-
play between molecular weight and sulfur content on
thermo-oxidative stability.
6 F. Luo, K. Wu, J. Zheng, H. Guo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015,
132, 41829.
7 F. Gardea, J. Garcia, D. Boday, K. Bajjuri, M. Naraghi, J.
Hedrick, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 2260–2267.
8 M. Mao, S. Das, R. Turner, Polymer 2007, 48, 6245.
9 I. Blanco, G. Cicala, A. Latteri, A. Mamo, A. Recca, J. Therm.
Anal., Calorim. 2013, 112, 375–381.
10 H. Ohtani, S. Tsuge, In Applied Pyrolysis Handbook, 2nd Ed.;
T. Wampler, Ed; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Fl, 2007, pp 249–269.
11 C. Libanati, L. Broadbelt, C. lamarca, M. Klien, S. Andrews,
R. Cotter, Mol. Simul. 1993, 11, 187–204.
12 M. Sonnenschein, Polyurethanes: Science, Technology, Mar-
kets, and Trends, John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2015,
Chapter 3.
CONCLUSIONS
13 D. Liaw, W. Shen, Angew. Makromol. Chem. 1992, 199, 171–
190.
The synthesis of alkoxylated bisphenol-S polyols was accom-
plished and FR potential compared with bisphenol-A analogs
and standard polyether and terephthalic acid based aromatic
polyester polyols. The sulfone polyols are viewed as offering
a potential alternative to halogen- or phosphorous-based
FRs. Bisphenol-S polyols possessed higher viscosities than
bisphenol-A and terephthalic acid analogues of similar
molecular weight, presumably due to the increased inter-
chain hydrogen bonding potential afforded by the sulfone
moiety. The sulfone polyols exhibited significantly better
thermo-oxidative stability relative to the comparatives as
measured by gas evolution, and pyrolysis GC mass spectro-
scopic techniques. Sulfur dioxide is only evolved at tempera-
tures above 600 8C presumably due to prior incorporation
into a char.
14 W. Bodnar, R. Blackburn, J. Krise, M. Moseley, J. Am. Soc.
Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 971–979.
15 N. Almora-Barrios, S. Pogodin, L. Bellarosa, M. Garcia-
Melchior, G. Revilla-Lopez, M. Garcia-Rates, A. Vazquez-Garcia,
P. Hernandez-Ariznavarreta, N. Lopez, ChemCatChem 2015, 7,
928–935.
16 J. Sebastian, D. Srinivas, Appl. Catal A: Gen. 2015, 506, 163–172.
17 S. Singh, J. Fife, S. Dubs, P. Coleman, In Proceedings of API
Polyurethanes Technical Conference Salt Lake City, American
Chemical Council Pubs, Troy, MI, September 25–27, 2006; pp
819–833.
18 J. Ferry, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, 2nd ed.; John
Wiley and Sons: New York, 1970; Chapter 10.
19 R. Menescal, J. Eveland, R. West, M. Blazso, Macromole-
cules 1994, 27, 5893–5899.
20 P. Bradna, J. Zima, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 1991, 21, 207–
220.
21 G. You, Z. Cheng, Y. Tang, H. He, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2015, 54, 7309–7319.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
22 F. Mohaddes, L. Wang, R. Shanks, S. Fergusson, Green
Chem. Lett. Rev. 2014, 7, 184–190.
The authors would like to thank Bruce Gerhart for the evolved
gas measurements, and Ganesh Kailasam for helpful discus-
sions. The Dow Chemical Co. is thanked for its support of this
work.
23 S. Materazzi, R. Risoluto, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2014, 49,
635–665.
24 K. Erickson, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2007, 89, 427–440.
2108
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2016, 54, 2102–2108