ing the reaction temperature to 20 °C increased the yield of 5a
to 84% and the enantiomeric excess was 96% ee.
The results of enantioselective hydrolysis of various a,a-
disubstituted malononitriles by Rhodococcus sp. CGMCC 0497
(Scheme 3) at 20 °C or 30 °C are summarized in Table 1.‡ As
shown, in all cases, the chemical yields of a,a-disubstituted
malonamic acids 5 were greatly improved at 20 °C compared to
that at 30 °C and all the products were achieved in excellent
enantioselectivity. The strain tolerates aromatic ring sub-
stituents in the ortho-, meta-, and para-positions and all para-
substituted substrates gave slightly high enantiomeric excesses
than ortho- and meta- ones. 2-Phenylethyl-2-methylmalononi-
trile 1i gave product 2-phenylethyl-2-methylmalonamic acid 5i
with 96% yield and > 99% ee as the exclusive product at 20
°C.
Scheme 4 Synthesis of either (R)- or (S)-a-alkylated amino acid: (a) DMF,
EtBr, K2CO3, rt; (b )DMF, Hg(OAc)2, NBS, EtOH, rt; (c) 20% HCl, reflux;
(d) P2O5, toluene; (e) 3 N NaOH, THF, rt; (f) SOCl2, NaN3, MeOH.
Professor Lijun Xia and Miss Zuoding Ding for performing the
HPLC analysis.
Notes and references
Scheme 3 Asymmetric hydrolysis of a,a-disubstituted malononitriles.
‡ A suspension of 10 g washed wet cells and 80 ml 0.1 mM potassium
phosphate buffer (pH = 7.0) was incubated at 30 or 20 °C for 30 min with
continuously magnetic stirring before the addition of 1 (100 mg in 100 ml
acetone). The reaction was quenched by centrifugation. The resulting
supernatant was acidified and extracted with ethyl acetate and dried over
Na2SO4. After concentration, the residue was purified by flash chromatog-
raphy on silica gel (elute+petroleum ether–EtOAc–AcOH 150+100+1).
Table 1 Enantioselective hydrolysis of various a,a-disubstituted malononi-
triles by Rhodococcus sp. CGMCC 0497
Entrya
Substrate
X
T/°C
Yield (%) ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1b
1b
1c
1c
1d
1d
1e
1e
1f
p-CH3
p-CH3
p-F
30
20
30
20
30
20
30
20
30
20
30
20
30
20
30
20
31
58
43
80
42
83
40
81
30
58
40
85
34
65
90
96
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99
> 99c
> 99c
97
1 K. V. Thimann and S. Mahadervan, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 1964, 105,
133; Y. Asano, K. Fujishiro, Y. Tani and H. Yamada, Agri. Biol. Chem.,
1982, 46, 1165.
2 J. Crosby, J. Moilliet, J. S. Parratt and and N. J. Turner, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 1679; M. Wieser and T. Nagasawa, in
Stereoselective Biocatalysis, ed. R. N. Patel, Dekker, New York, 2000,
pp. 461–486.
p-F
p-Cl
p-Cl
p-Br
p-Br
p-MeO
p-MeO
m-Cl
m-Cl
o-Cl
o-Cl
H
3 M.-X. Wang, G. Lu, G.-J. Ji, Z.-T. Huang, O. Meth-Cohn and J. Colby,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 1123; S. Payne, S. Wu, R. D.
Fallon, G. Tudor, B. Stieglitz, J. M. Turner and M. J. Nelson,
Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 5447; K. Yamamoto, K. Oishi, I. Fujimatsu and
K. I. Komatus, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1991, 57, 3028; N. Layh, A.
Stolz, S. Forster, F. Effenberger and H.-J. Knackmuss, Arch. Microbiol.,
1992, 158, 405; A. M. Macadam and C. J. Knowles, Biotechnol. Lett.,
1985, 7, 865; M.-X. Wang and S.-J. Lin, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 6542;
H. Idogaki, N. Kasai, M. Takeuchi, M. Hatada and T. Suzuki,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12, 369.
4 G. DeSantis, Z. Zhu, W. A. Greenberg, K. Wong, J. Chaplin, S. R.
Hanson, B. Farwell, L. W. Nicholson, C. L. Rand, D. P. Weiner, D. E.
Robertson and M. J. Burk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 9024.
5 F. Effenberger and S. Osswald, Synthesis, 2001, 12, 1866; T. Beard, M.
A. Cohen, J. S. Parratt, N. J. Turner, J. Crosby and J. Moilliet,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1993, 4, 1085; H. Kakeya, N. Sakai, A. Sano,
M. Yokoyama, T. Sugai and H. Ohta, Chem. Lett., 1991, 1823.
6 M. Yokoyama, T. Sugai and H. Ohta, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1993, 4,
1081.
7 B. M. Trost and X. Ariza, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2635
and references therein; D. Ma and K. Ding, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 2515; J.
S. Clark and M. D. Middleton, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 765; T. Ooi, M.
Takeuchi, M. Kameda and K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
5228.
8 C. Cativiela and M. D. Diaz-de-Villegas, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1998, 9, 3517 and references therein.
9 (a) Z.-L. Wu and Z.-Y. Li, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12, 3305; (b)
Z.-L. Wu and Z.-Y. Li, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 2002, 35, 61.
10 K. Faber, Biotransformations in organic chemistry: a textbook, 4th ed.,
Spring-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
1f
1g
1g
1h
1h
1i
98
98c
99c
99d
Ii
H
> 99e
a All the reactions were carried out for 6 days at 30 °C or 7 days at 20 °C
unless stated otherwise. b Determined by HPLC on a Chiralpak AS column
with hexane–propan-2-ol mixtures unless stated otherwise. c Determined by
HPLC on a Chiralcel OJ column. d The reactions were carried out for 90 h.
e The reactions were carried out for 98 h.
The products of the enantioselective hydrolysis of a,a-
disubstituted malononitriles, (R)-a,a-disubstituted malonamic
acids 5, could afford either (R)- or (S)-a-alkylated amino acids
after routine conversion. For example, (R)-a-benzyl-a-me-
thylmalonamic acid 5a was transferred to (R)-9 or (S)-9 in a
yield of 81% or 89%. (Scheme 4). a-Methylphenylalanine 9 is
an efficient b-turn and helix former, much stronger than its non-
methylated parent compound phenylalanine.8
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a successful application
of the strain Rhodococcus sp. CGMCC 0497 in the asymmetric
hydrolysis of a,a-disubstituted malononitriles to afford en-
antiopure (R)-a,a-disubstituted malonamic acids, which can be
converted to either (R)- or (S)-a-alkylated amino acids. The new
strategy to carry out the reaction at a lower temperature greatly
improved the efficacy of the reaction.
11 M. Kobayashi, T. Nagasawa and H. Yamada, TIBTECH, 1992, 10,
402.
12 M. Kobayashi and S. Shimizu, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2000, 4, 95.
We are grateful to the National Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. 20032020) for financial support. We also thank
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 386–387
387