bromotrimethylsilane dealkylation22 of tetra-isopropyl (difluoro)-
methylenebis(phosphonate),8 synthesized by fluorination of the
carbanion of tetra-isopropyl methylenebis(phosphonate).7,23
Phosphorylation to the dNTP analogues 3 or 6 was cleanly
achieved using NDPK and a catalytic amount of ATP, regener-
ated with 2.5 equiv of PEP with PK in 50 mM HEPES buffer
(75-90% by HPLC and 31P NMR). Importantly, the latter
modification renders unnecessary the use of an affinity column20
to purify the product from excess ATP.
Initial DNA polymerase inhibition studies on R,ꢀ-CF2 dCTP, 6
at 1 mM showed no detectable background DNA synthesis with
0.5 nM enzyme, and only a trace with 50 nM enzyme, representing
<0.01% of the inhibitor (Figure 1A). Comparable absence of
Purification of r,ꢀ-dNTPs. To obtain product free of
detectable nucleotide contaminants, we found that separa-
tion on DEAE Sephadex or Dowex3,5,9,12-14,24-30 or
single-pass preparative HPLC using a C-18 or ion-
exchange3,5,9,12-14,24-31 column was not sufficient.
However, dual-HPLC (ion exchange, then C-18) provided
1
highly purified products based on analytical HPLC and H,
31P, and 19F NMR analysis (Supporting Information).
This overall synthesis/purification route has the advantage of
being applicable to both purine and pyrimidine examples, including
the previously unavailable R,ꢀ-CF2 dCTP analogue 6. The reactions
are relatively clean (particularly compared to standard CDI phos-
phorylation), do not require protection/deprotection chemistry in
the phosphate moieties, eliminate the problem of excess ATP in
the enzymatic phosphorylation, and after the dual-HPLC purifica-
tion provide exceptionally pure analogues suitable for polymerase
inhibition studies (see below). The dual-HPLC purification protocol
was also effective in reducing impurities in R,ꢀ-CF2 dTTP 9
prepared by the p-nitrobenzyl-phosphomorpholidate method (see
below).
Figure 1. Gapped DNA synthesis assay with DNA pol ꢀ for dNTPs
(dCTP, dATP, dTTP) and R,ꢀ-CXY analogues. Primer (n) extension was
assayed in the presence of low (L, 0.5 nM) or high (H, 50 nM) pol ꢀ and
1 mM analogue for 5 or 10 min, respectively. (A) dCTP versus 6. (B) 3
versus 11, 9, dATP, and dTTP. The mobility of the extension product (n
+ 1) with dCTP, dATP, or dTTP serves as a reference, where most of
the primer (200 nM) is extended after a 21 min incubation with 50 nM
enzyme and 100 µM dNTP.
background synthesis was evident in the assay using R,ꢀ-CF2
dATP, 3 (Figure 1B). For comparison, with a preparation of
inhibitor 9 obtained via the p-nitrobenzyl phosphoromorpholidate
method, at 50 nM pol ꢀ most of the primer strand in the assay has
been extended, with some incorporation still detectable using the
lower concentration of enzyme (Figure 1B). After dual-HPLC
purification, this artifact was no longer observable with 0.5 nM
enzyme, although incorporation at 50 nM enzyme was more
evident than for 6 and 3 (Supporting Information).
Inhibition of natural nucleotide insertion by the different R,ꢀ-
modified dNTP analogues was investigated at various concentra-
tions of inhibitor (I) and subsaturating dNTP substrate (S). Steady-
state kinetic parameters (km, Km) were determined by fitting the
rate data to the Michaelis equation, and the inhibitor constant Ki
()Kd) was determined by fitting the inhibition data to the equation
for competitive inhibition (Supporting Information). Both fits used
nonlinear regression methods. Equilibrium dissociation constants
(Kd) for the natural dNTPs were taken from previously published
data [dATP;33 dCTP;34 dTTP35]. The Ki’s for 10, 11, and 12 were
reported previously.6,36
DNA Synthesis Assays. DNA synthesis was assayed on four
single-nucleotide gapped DNA substrates where the templating
base in the gap was complementary to the incoming dNTP. The
DNA sequence was as described previously32 with the core
sequence identical to that used for crystallization.
(16) Kalek, M.; Jemielity, J.; Stepinski, J.; Stolarski, R.; Darzynkiewicz,
E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2417
(17) Otmar, M.; Masojfdkova, M.; Votruba, I.; Holy, A. Collect. Czech.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 66, 500–506
(18) Hoard, D. E.; Ott, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1785
(19) Li, R.; Muscate, A.; Kenyon, G. L. Bioorg. Chem. 1996, 24, 251
.
.
.
.
(20) (a) Wu, W.; Bergstrom, D. E.; Davisson, V. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 3860. (b) Rezende, M. C.; Vallejos, G.; Osorio-Olivares, M.; Sepulveda-
Boza, S. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 3699
(21) Rao, N. S.; Kumar, P.; Chauhan, V. K.; Garg, B. S.; Gupta, K. C.
Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2002, 21, 393
(22) McKenna, C. E.; Higa, M. T.; Cheung, N. H.; McKenna, M.-C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 155
(23) Marma, M. S.; Khawli, L. A.; Harutunian, V.; Kashemirov, B. A.;
McKenna, C. E. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 1467
(24) Blackburn, G. M.; Kent, D. E.; Kolkmann, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1981, 1188
(25) Victorova, L.; Sosunov, V.; Skoblov, A.; Shipytsin, A.; Krayevsky,
A. FEBS Lett. 1999, 453, 6
.
.
.
.
.
.
(26) Hamilton, C. J.; Roberts, S. M.; Shipitsin, A. Chem. Commun. 1998,
The CF2-analogues readily inhibit pol ꢀ single-nucleotide
insertion (Figure 2). However, their binding affinities are at least
1087
.
(27) Shipitsin, A. V.; Victorova, L. S.; Shirokova, E. A.; Dyatkina, N. B.;
Goryunova, L. E.; Beabealashvilli, R. S.; Hamilton, C. J.; Roberts, S. M.;
Krayevsky, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1039
(28) Martynov, B. I.; Shirokova, E. A.; Jasko, M. V.; Victorova, L. S.;
Krayevsky, A. A. FEBS Lett. 1997, 410, 423
(29) Blackburn, G. M.; Kent, D. E.; Kolkmann, F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1984, 1119
(30) Moffatt, J. G.; Khorana, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 649
(31) (a) Mohamady, S.; Jakeman, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10588.
(b) Marlow, A. L.; Kiessling, L. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2517
.
(33) Radhakrishnan, R.; Arora, K.; Wang, Y. L.; Beard, W. A.; Wilson,
S. H.; Schlick, T. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 15142.
.
(34) Vande Berg, B. J.; Beard, W. A.; Wilson, S. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2001,
276, 3408.
.
(35) Beard, W. A.; Shock, D. D.; Yang, X. P.; DeLauder, S. F.; Wilson,
S. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 8235.
.
(36) Batra, V. K.; Beard, W. A.; Shock, D. D.; Pedersen, L. C.; Wilson,
.
S. H. Mol. Cell 2008, 30, 315
(37) Nieschalk, J.; Batsanov, A. S.; OHagan, D.; Howard, J. A. K.
Tetrahedron 1996, 1, 165
.
(32) Beard, W. A.; Shock, D. D.; Wilson, S. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2004,
279, 31921.
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 9, 2009
1885