sensitive aldol product initially proved to be troublesome.
Competitive retro-aldol and â-elimination resulted in only
low yields of the desired glycolate being isolated.9 After
considerable experimentation, we found that the combination
of Ag2O and 2,6-lutidine in DMF resulted in formation of
glycolate 6 in acceptable yield on a multigram scale. The
optimal yield (65-70%) was obtained by performing the
reaction for 7 days at 4 °C. The reaction could be performed
at considerably shorter reaction times at higher temperatures
(24 h, rt), although the yield decreased to ca. 50%.
Scheme 1
We were gratified to find that the key cycloaldol reaction
occurred smoothly to give isobenzofuran 7 upon treatment
of glycolate 6 with KHMDS in THF at -78 °C (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3a
ketoglycolate. The glycolate would in turn be derived from
aldol addition of (S)-(+)-carvone and the corresponding
aldehyde. The intermolecular aldol addition of the (E)-enolate
derived from carvone would be used install the desired anti
stereochemical relationship at C-1 and C-2 common to the
eunicellins (cf. Figure 1).
There are scattered reports in the literature of chemo-
selective enolization of esters or lactones in the presence of
nominally more acidic ketones or aldehydes.5,6 In a few cases,
the enolates undergo cycloaldol reactions with the ketone
or aldehyde carbonyl group,5 while in others a different
reaction pathway ensues.6 Burke reported the selective
enolization of a glycolate ester in the presence of a cyclo-
pentenone for a subsequent Ireland-Claisen rearrangement.6a
We felt that a similar chemoselective enolization could be
used to induce a cycloaldolization.7
a Conditions: (a) KHMDS, THF, -78 °C; (b) PCC, silica gel,
CH2Cl2, rt.
The â-C-9 stereoisomer was the only isomer detected by 1H
NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture. The structural
assignment was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis
of a derivative (see Supporting Information). The isobenzo-
furan bicycle was thus accessible in only three steps from
(S)-(+)-carvone. However, it was necessary to adjust the
oxidation level of the cycloaldol product, since the eunicellin
diterpenes are not oxygenated at C-10.1 To this end, an
oxidative rearrangement of allylic alcohol 7 was effected to
generate enone 8.10 The enone could be used to activate the
C-13 position as well as introduce the â-hydrogen at C-10
(vide infra).
The key cycloaldol precursor 6 was prepared from (S)-
(+)-carvone in two steps (Scheme 2). Intermolecular aldol
Scheme 2a
We sought to install the C-10 hydrogen via an allylic
diazene rearrangement (Scheme 4). Such rearrangements
have previously been employed to install angular hydrogens
in carbocyclic systems via reduction of the corresponding
R,â-unsaturated tosylhydrazones.11 A critical feature of the
strategy is the stereochemistry of reduction of the tosyl-
hydrazone, since the rearrangement is a suprafacial process.
a Conditions: (a) LDA, THF, -78 °C, methacrolein, HOAc; (b)
Ag2O, BrCH2CO2Et, 2,6-lutidine, DMF, 4 °C, 7 days.
(7) For leading references on cycloaldol reactions that do not involve
deprotonation, see: Fang, C.; Suganuma, K.; Suemune, H.; Sakai, K. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 1549-1554. Heathcock, C. H.; Ruggeri,
R. B.; McClure, K. F. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2585-2594. Kanai, K.;
Wakabayashi, H.; Honda, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2549-2551. Molander, G.
A.; Brown, G. A.; Storch de Gracia, I. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3459-
3463.
addition of (S)-(+)-carvone and methacrolein gave anti-aldol
5 in excellent yield.8 Williamson etherification of the
(8) Martin, S. F.; White, J. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 23-26.
(9) Patel, D. V.; VanMiddlesworth, F.; Donaubauer, J.; Ganett, P.; Sih,
C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4603-4614. Burk, R. M.; Gac, T. S.;
Roof, M. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 8111-8112.
(5) Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2419-2425. Rassu, G.; Auzzas,
L.; Pinna, L.; Zambrano, V.; Battistini, L.; Zanardi, F.; Marzocchi, L.;
Acquotti, D.; Casiraghi, G. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8070-8075. Suzuki,
T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 2821-2825. Pinto, A. C.; Epifanio, R.
d. A.; Camargo, W. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 5039-5046.
(6) (a) Burke, S. D.; Fobare, W. F.; Pacofsky, G. J. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 5221-5228. (b) Paterson, I.; Hulme, A. N. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
3288-3300.
(10) Majetich, G.; Condon, S.; Hull, K.; Ahmad, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 1033-1036.
(11) Harapanhalli, R. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 3149-
3154. Chu, M.; Coates, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4590-4597. Greco,
M. N.; Maryanoff, B. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5009-5012.
1040
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 7, 2003