1636
P. Ballard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1633–1637
Table 2. Selected DMPK data for compound 12
PPB free %a
Vdss (L/kg)
Cl (ml/min/kg)
t1/2 (h)
Bio-availability (%)
Mouse
Rat
3.11
2.51
8.2
12.3
20
66
5.2
2.9
103
63
a Measured at 37 ꢁC (mouse) and 25 ꢁC (rat).
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Compound 16 illustrates that moving the methoxy
group to C-6 results in an order of magnitude drop in
affinity when compared with 12, and this may be due
to a significant conformational change in the C-5 side
chain. Removal of the methoxy group as in 17 also leads
to a potent inhibitor, although in general terms, removal
of the C-7 methoxy was often seen to be detrimental to
EGFR inhibition (when a broader range of anilines was
examined, the mean change in activity from C-7 hydro-
gen to C-7 methoxy is a potency shift of 1.2 log units, 14
matched pairs, data not shown). We next examined the
effect of extension from the basic nitrogen in 12. Consis-
tent with the binding model, the N–H piperidine ana-
logue 18 showed similar affinity to the N-methyl
analogue 12. Introduction of ethyl (compound 19) and
propyl (compound 20) also resulted in potent enzyme
inhibition, indicating a degree of tolerance for steric
bulk in this region. Consistent with the hypothesised
charge interaction around the ribose binding pocket,
neutral piperidines such as 21 and 22 showed markedly
reduced activity. Finally, we observed that by use of a
suitably positioned basic side chain at C-7, activity
could be regained with a previously less active C-5 sub-
stituent. Tetrahydropyran 13 demonstrates modest
affinity as discussed above. By appending the pipera-
zine-based side chain in 24, activity is restored and po-
tent inhibition seen. Figure 1 (lower panel) shows this
compound docked into EGFR tyrosine kinase. In this
model, the C-5 tetrahydropyran occupies the ribose
binding pocket, and the basic C-7 side chain extends
towards the solvent exposed region and may pick up
favourable charge interactions in the area towards
Glu780. That this is likely due to charge complementa-
rities is supported by compound 23 that positions a
neutral side chain at C-7 yet shows a similarly low
affinity to tetrahydropyran 13.
Control
Cpd 12 (100 mg/kg)
Cpd 12 (50 mg/kg)
60% inhibition
P < 0.05
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Days of treatment
Figure 2. LoVo xenograft study with compound 12 showing degree of
inhibition of tumour volume after 13 days of treatment. Terminal
blood samples were taken 6 h after the final dose and analysis showed a
dose related increase in total exposure: 2.3 lM (50 mg/kg) and 4.1 lM
(100 mg/kg).
po with compound suspended in 1% (v/v) polysorbate
80. Tumour growth was measured twice-weekly using
callipers. Gratifyingly at the highest dose tested,
100 mg/kg, compound 12 demonstrated 60% inhibition
of tumour volume. A clear dose response was observed,
with no significant change from control seen at the lower
dose of 50 mg/kg.
In summary, chemistry has been developed to a series of
novel C-5 substituted anilinoquinazolines, selected on
the basis of docking experiments and overlays with
ATP in the active site of EGFR tyrosine kinase. Clear
SAR emerged concerning the requirements for good
affinity with these structures, in particular the require-
ments for basic moieties at positions C-5 and/or C-7.
Selected examples exhibit both good cellular activity
and pharmacokinetics, and resulted in significant inhibi-
tion in an in vivo model of anti-cancer activity.
Compound 12 was selected for further study. In an
EGF-driven KB cell proliferation assay,15 12 was shown
to inhibit proliferation with an IC50 of 87( 4) nM.
Selected DMPK data are shown in Table 2 following
an oral dose of 5 mg/kg and iv dose of 2 mg/kg. A good
pharmacokinetic profile were observed in both mouse
and rat, with data superior in the former. Slightly higher
clearance and a shorter half-life was observed in the rat
compared with mouse, and consistent with the presence
of a basic side chain, Vdss was seen to be high in both
species. Solubility in pH 7.4 buffer was measured at
2.1 lM. Based on the observed potency in cell-based
assays, and the favourable pharmacokinetic profile,
compound 12 was progressed to a LoVo Xenograft
study (Fig. 2). Female nude mice were implanted subcu-
taneously with 1 · 107 LoVo colon tumour cells. Once
tumours were established, animals were randomised
between groups (n = 7 per group) and dosed once daily
References and notes
1. Yarden, Y.; Sliwkowski, M. X. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2001, 2, 127.
2. Salomon, D. S.; Brandt, R.; Ciardiello, F.; Normanno, N.
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Haematol. 1995, 19, 183.
3. Herbst, R. S.; Fukuoka, M.; Baselga, J. Nat. Rev. Cancer
2004, 4, 956.
4. Bonomi, P. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2003, 12, 1395.
5. Douglas Laird, A.; Cherrington, J. M. Expert Opin.
Investig. Drugs 2003, 12, 51; Ciardiello, F.; De Vita, F.;
Orditura, M.; De Placido, S.; Tortora, G. Expert Opin.
Emerg. Drugs 2003, 8, 501.
6. (a) Rewcastle, G. W.; Denny, W. A.; Bridges, A. J.; Zhou,
H.; Cody, D. R.; McMichael, A.; Fry, D. W. J. Med.
Chem. 1995, 38, 3482; Bridges, A. J.; Zhou, H.; Cody, D.
R.; Rewcastle, G. W.; McMichael, A.; Showalter, H. D.
H.; Fry, D. W.; Kraker, A. J.; Denny, W. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1996, 39, 267.