It has recently been shown that chiral silanes can be used
to resolve the chemical shifts of enantiotopic stereogenic
centers and to determine the absolute configuration of natural
products.5,8,9 However, the absolute stereochemical deter-
mination of a molecule with use of these previously described
diphenyl alkyl-substituted silyl ethers was only possible when
enantiomerically pure standards were available for compari-
son.5,9 We suspected that if a derivative could be designed
that had a conformationally stabilizing component to its
structure, it would be possible to reliably determine absolute
stereochemistry by using this type of synthetic tool.
Figure 1. General conformational model for the PhTFE derivatives
discussed in the text.
In 1976, Pirkle and co-workers postulated that the interac-
tion of a carbinyl hydrogen and a basic site on a molecule
can afford a chelate-like structure that provides a reasonably
stable and predictable solution conformation.10 On the basis
of Pirkle’s findings, we designed a silyl ether that would
allow for conformational control using this principle. For
this purpose, dichlorodimethylsilane (2) was reacted with R-
or S-R-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl alcohol (1) at room temper-
ature in the presence of triethylamine to give R-(trifluoro-
methyl)benzyl silyl chloride (3) (Scheme 1). This silyl
chloride can subsequently be used to quickly and smoothly
derivatize the chiral alcohol of interest with use of a mild
base.
derivatives in much the same way as has been described
previously for the advanced Mosher method.4
According to our conformational model, the protons on
L1 (Figure 1) will be shielded upfield by the aromatic ring
of the PhTFE functionality when using the R-PhTFE (4a)
derivative. Similarly, the protons on L2 will be shielded
upfield when using the S-PhTFE derivative (4b). It follows
that in 4a protons with a (δR - δS) value <0 would be
placed on the L1 face and those protons with a value >0
would be positioned on the L2 face. If the chemical shift
trends (<0 or >0) are consistent on each of the L1 and L2
faces of the model, the absolute stereochemistry can be
assigned by using this method. In analogy to the advanced
Mosher method, if the (δR - δS) value signs are not
consistent on L1 and L2, it can be assumed that the
derivatizing agent must be forced into a nonideal conforma-
tion and the stereochemistry cannot be confidently assigned
with use of this method.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of PhTFE derivatives and recovery of
starting alcohol.
As an initial test of this theory, the R- and S-PhTFE
derivatives of (S)-butanol (6a and 6b, respectively) were
synthesized and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy. As can be
seen in Figure 2, the observed chemical shift changes agree
very well with our predictions.
Encouraged by these results, we synthesized the (R)-
PhTFE derivative of (R)-pantolactone (7a) and acquired a
It was envisioned that the final silyl diether product (4)
would adopt a predominant conformation similar to the one
shown in Figure 1. We also hypothesized that this conforma-
tion would be encouraged by a key interaction between the
carbinyl proton of the R-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl ether and
the oxygen of the derivatized alcohol (Figure 1). Once the
corresponding R- and S-R-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl silyl de-
rivatives (R- and S-PhTFE) are synthesized, the absolute
stereochemistry can be determined through analysis of the
chemical shift differences (δR - δS) observed for the two
(6) For an excellent reference see: Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M.
ProtectiVe Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1999.
(7) Corey, E. J.; Snider, B. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2549-2550.
(8) Chan, H.; Peng, Q.-J.; Wang, D.; Guo, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1987, 325-326.
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of the R- (6a) and S-PhTFE (6b)
derivatives of S-butanol in CDCl3. Note the 9% (R)-enantiomer
present in the commercially available chiral alcohol.
(9) Smedley, S. R.; Schroeder, F. C.; Weibel, D. B.; Meinwald, J.;
Lafleur, K. A.; Renwick, J. A.; Rukowski, R.; Eisner, T. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 6822-6827.
(10) Pirkle, W. H.; Hauske, J. R. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 801-805.
1746
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 10, 2003