C. Lescop et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 116 (2016) 222e238
235
b) N-methylisobutylamine (78 uL, 0.65 mmol) was added to a
suspension of (S)-N-(3-(2-ethyl-4-(5-(3-formylphenyl)-1,2,4-
oxadiazol-3-yl)-6-methylphenoxy)-2-hydroxypropyl)-2-
methyl-2-thiophencarboxylic acid according to the procedures
described in the literature [46,70]; LC-MS: tR
¼
0.70 min,
[Mþ1]þ ¼ not detectable, 1H NMR (D6-DMSO):
d 13.67 (s br, 1 H),
hydroxyacetamide 13a (103 mg, 0.24 mmol) in DCM (10 mL) and
NMP (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 1 h and was
then cooled to 0 ꢂC and NaBH(OAc)3 (250 mg,1.18 mmol) was added
followed by acetic acid (0.4 mL). The reaction mixture was warmed
to rt and stirred for 18 h. The reaction was then quenched with
MeOH (3 mL) and concentrated to give an orange wax which was
purified by prep-HPLC (XBridge Prep C18, gradient of acetonitrile in
water containing 0.5% NH4OH) to afford the title compound 14e
(55.4 mg, 48%); LC-MS*: tR ¼ 0.58 min, [Mþ1]þ ¼ 525.38; HRMS
(ESIþ) m/z calculated for C29H40N4O5 [Mþ1]þ 525.3077, found
10.09 (s, 1 H), 7.67 (s, 1 H), 2.57 (s, 3 H).
4.1.9. (S)-N-(3-(2-ethyl-4-(5-(5-((isobutyl(methyl)amino)methyl)-
4-methylthiophen-2-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-6-methylphenoxy)-
2-hydroxypropyl)-2-hydroxy-acetamide (20e)
The title compound was prepared in analogy to compound 14e
starting from 18b and using N-isobutylmethylamine for the
reductive amination (82 mg); LC-MS: tR
¼
0.77 min;
[Mþ1]þ ¼ 531.32; HRMS (ESIþ) m/z calculated for C27H38N4O5S
[Mþ1]þ 531.2681, found 531.2645; 1H NMR (D6-DMSO):
d 7.82 (s,
525.3080; 1H NMR (D6-DMSO):
d
7.94 (s, 1 H), 7.90 (s, 1 H), 7.79 (s,
1 H), 7.73 (s, 2 H), 7.69 (t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz,1 H), 5.55 (t, J ¼ 5.7 Hz,1 H), 5.30
(d, J ¼ 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.00e3.91 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (d, J ¼ 5.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.77
(dd, J1 ¼ 9.7 Hz, J2 ¼ 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.72 (dd, J1 ¼ 9.7 Hz, J2 ¼ 6.1 Hz,
1 H), 3.67 (s, 2 H), 3.48e3.39 (m, 1 H), 3.29e3.20 (m, 1 H), 2.72 (q,
J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.34 (s, 3 H), 2.23 (s, 6 H), 2.21 (d, J ¼ 7.4 Hz, 2 H),
1.87e1.75 (m, 1 H), 1.22 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (d, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, 6 H).
2 H), 7.69 (t, J ¼ 5.3 Hz,1 H), 7.47 (s, 1 H), 5.55 (t, J ¼ 5.7 Hz,1 H), 5.31
(d, J ¼ 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.96e3.93 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (d, J ¼ 5.7 Hz, 2 H),
3.81e3.70 (m, 2 H), 3.54 (s, 2 H), 3.48e3.40 (m, 1 H), 3.29e3.21 (m,
1 H), 2.73 (q, J ¼ 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 2.44 (s, 3 H), 2.35 (s, 3 H), 2.15 (s, 3 H),
2.12 (d, J ¼ 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.88e1.77 (m, 1 H), 1.23 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 3 H),
0.89 (d, J ¼ 6.5 Hz, 6 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d
176.0,172.6,168.6,157.6,
13C NMR (CD3OD):
d 174.1, 171.6, 168.3, 157.8, 146.4, 137.8, 135.6,
141.0, 138.9, 137.5, 134.1, 131.5, 128.4, 127.3, 126.7, 125.7, 124.0, 123.1,
74.0, 70.3, 66.2, 62.2, 42.7, 42.2, 26.2, 22.9, 21.3, 20.9, 16.5, 14.8.
134.5,131.8, 127.8, 126.1,122.3,122.2, 74.6, 69.1, 65.9, 61.2, 54.9, 41.8,
41.6, 26.2, 22.5, 19.8, 15.3, 14.0, 12.5. Despite purification by prep.
HPLC the product always contained a few % of aldehyde 19b ac-
cording to the LCMS and NMR analysis.
4.1.6. 3-Ethyl-4-formyl-benzoic acid (15e) [68].
a) 4-Formyl-3-hydroxy-benzoic acid (1.5 g, 9.0 mmol) and pyr-
idine (2.9 mL, 36.1 mmol) were dissolved in DCM (50 mL). The
solution was cooled to 0 ꢂC before adding triflic anhydride (3.1 mL,
19 mmol) and was then stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was
quenched with 1 mL NH4OH, evaporated and the crude compound
was purified by prep. HPLC (XBridge Prep C18) to give 4-formyl-3-
(((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)oxy)benzoic acid (413 mg, 15%). LC-
MS*: tR ¼ 0.52 min, [Mþ1]þ ¼ not detectable; 1H NMR (D8-THF):
In vitro 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) Phototoxicity Test.
[60,61] The 3T3 NRU phototoxicity assay utilizes normal Balb/c 3T3
mouse fibroblasts to measure the concentration-dependent
reduction in neutral red uptake by the cells one day after treat-
ment with the chemical either in the presence or in the absence of a
non-cytotoxic dose of UVA radiation. Balb/c 3T3 cells (clone 31,
ECACC) were cultured overnight in duplicate 96-well microtiter
ml in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% new born calf serum
(NBCS, PAA B15-102), 4 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and
plates at a density of 1 ꢃ 104 cells/100
d
9.03 (s, 1 H), 8.40 (s, 1 H), 6.40 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.30 (d,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.24 (s, 1 H).
b) To a solution of 4-formyl-3-(((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)oxy)
benzoic acid (200 mg, 0.67 mmol) in dioxane (5 mL) was added
Pd(dppf)Cl2 (4.5 mg, 0.01 eq.) under nitrogen atmosphere. Diethyl
zinc (15wt % in toluene, 0.9 mL,1.0 mmol) was then added dropwise
and the reaction mixture was stirred at 75 ꢂC for 1 h. After evap-
oration, the crude compound was purified by prep. HPLC (XBridge
Prep C18) to give the title compound (66 mg, 55%). LC-MS*:
tR ¼ 0.62 min, [Mþ1]þ ¼ not detectable; 1H NMR (D6-DMSO):
100 mg/mL streptomycin. The next day the cells were washed with
phosphate buffered saline containing CaCl2 and MgCl2 (PBSþþ). 3T3
fibroblasts were exposed to eight different concentrations of
chemical, ranging from 0.05 to 100 mM, with a pre-incubation time
of 1 h (at 37 ꢂC, 5% CO2). One of the duplicate plates was exposed to
4 J/cm2 UVA (1.7 mW/cm2) for 40 min while the other plate was
kept in the dark. By using the UV-sun simulator UVACUBE 400
equipped with a SOL500 lamp and an H1-Filter (H1 Filter and
€
d
13.36 (s br, 1 H), 10.34 (s, 1 H), 7.94 (s, 2 H), 7.93 (s, 1 H), 3.10 (q,
frame: Cat. Number 4730, Dr. Honle UV Technology) a UV-spectrum
J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.21 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 3 H).
almost devoid of UVB is obtained. After UV exposure, PBSþþ was
replaced with culture medium and cell viability was assessed after
24 h. The NRU by cells was measured at 540 nm and the absorption
of wells exposed to the test chemical in the presence of UVA
exposure (þUVA) was compared to their NRU in the absence of UVA
exposure (-UVA). Dose-response curves were established for each
experiment. EC50 (þUVA) and EC50 (-UVA) values, i.e. the effective
concentration inhibiting cell viability by 50% of untreated controls
in the presence and absence of UVA exposure, were calculated by
using Phototox software version 2.0 [61]. The software was ob-
4.1.7. (S)-N-(3-(4-(5-(4-((dimethylamino)methyl)-3-ethylphenyl)-
1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-2-ethyl-6-methylphenoxy)-2-hydroxypropyl)-
2-hydroxyacetamide (17l)
The title compound was prepared in analogy to compound 14e
starting from 3-ethyl 4-formyl benzoic acid 15e and using 2N
dimethylamine in THF and NaBH(OAc)3 for the reductive amination
(48 mg); LC-MS*: tR ¼ 0.53 min, [Mþ1]þ ¼ 497.80; HRMS (ESIþ) m/
z calculated for C27H36N4O5 [Mþ1]þ 497.2764, found 497.2758; 1H
NMR (CDCl3):
d
8.06 (s, 1 H), 8.02 (dd, J1 ¼ 1.6 Hz, J2 ¼ 7.9 Hz, 1 H),
7.88 (s, 1 H), 7.86 (s, 1 H), 7.54 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.08 (t, J ¼ 5.8 Hz,
1 H), 4.24e4.16 (m, 3 H), 3.89 (dd, J1 ¼ 4.7 Hz, J2 ¼ 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.84
(dd, J1 ¼ 6.2 Hz, J2 ¼ 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.81e3.75 (m, 1 H), 3.56e3.46 (m,
3 H), 2.85 (q, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.74 (q, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H),
Chlorpromazine
(Sigma-
eAldrich C0982-5G) served as the positive control. A PIF was
calculated according to the formula PIF ¼ EC50 (-UVA)/EC50 (þUVA).
PIF values > 2.5 were considered to be predictive for phototoxic
potential.
2.31 (s, 6 H), 1.32 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 6 H); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d 175.8, 172.8,
168.6, 157.0, 144.2, 141.8, 137.5, 131.5, 130.5, 128.4, 128.2, 126.7,
125.4, 123.1, 123.0, 74.0, 70.3, 62.2, 61.1, 45.6, 42.2, 25.3, 22.9, 16.5,
15.0, 14.8.
In vitro potency assessment using GTP
GTP S binding assays were performed in 96 well polypropylene
microtiter plates in a final volume of 200 L. Membrane prepara-
gS binding assays.
g
m
tions of CHO cells expressing recombinant human S1P1 or S1P3
receptors were used. Assay conditions were 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4,
4.1.8. 5-Formyl-4-methyl-thiophene-2-carboxylic acid (18b)
The title compound is prepared from commercially available 3-
100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% fatty acid free BSA, 1 or 3 mM GDP