2464
M. Zahouily et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 2463–2465
refluxed for 4 h. Doubly distilled water (DDW) was used
to prepare the solutions. The FAP crystallites were
filtered, washed with DDW, dried overnight at 80°C and
calcined in air at 700°C for 30 min before use. The final
product is identified by X-ray diffraction (space group
hexagonal system; a=9.364 A and c=6.893 A), infrared
spectra IR and chemical analysis (Ca=38.29%, P=
17.78% and Ca/P=1.66). The BET specific surface area
was found to be S=15.4 m2/g. The total pore volume was
calculated by the BJH method at P/Po=0.98 (Vt=0.0576
cm3/g).
Except in one case, all the combinations lead selectively
to the corresponding expected 1,4-adducts. No by-prod-
ucts resulting from the undesirable 1,2-addition and/or
bis-addition side reactions (usually observed under clas-
sical conditions in some cases) were observed. However
reaction of 2-aminothiophenol with the Michael acceptor
bearing a nitro group (1 with X=NO2) gives an 85/15
mixture of 1,4- and 1,3-addition products (entry 2). The
formation of this a priori unexpected regioisomer
requires both a strong nucleophilic thiol and a strong
electron-acceptor X group on the aromatic moiety of
chalcone derivative.
,
,
The use of FAP thus prepared was examined as hetero-
geneous catalyst in the Michael addition of three thiols
2 to enones 1 derived from acetophenone and various
p-substituted benzaldehydes. With such combinations
the 1,4-adducts were isolated, as solids, with yields
ranging from 57 to 96%, depending on the electronic
demand of both thiol 2 and enone 1 (Table 1).11
Solid catalysts become particularly interesting when they
can be regenerated. Indeed, in our case, FAP was
recovered quantitatively by simple filtration and regener-
ated by calcination for 15 min at 700°C. The recovered
catalysts was reused several times without loss of activity,
even after the seventh cycle product 3g was obtained with
the same yield.
Results in Table 1 show, as expected, that the reaction
time is highly dependent on the nucleophilicity of the
mercaptan 2. Moreover, the presence of electron-with-
drawing groups X on the aromatic ring of the Michael
acceptor 1 decreases the reaction time proportionally to
the value of the Hammet constant. Meanwhile, the
presence of electron-donating groups X increases the
reaction time, demonstrating the participation of both
the enone and the thiol in the rate controlling step of the
reaction.
For the catalytic activity of FAP in this Michael addition
we speculate that the reaction occurs at the surface rather
than inside tunnels of the catalyst. The dimensions of the
tunnels in our catalyst are not large enough compared
to those of zeolites.12 Thus, we estimate that probably the
surface of FAP presents multicatalytic active sites. The
basic sites (CaF2 and oxygen of PO4 group) enhance the
thiol nucleophilicity and the acidic sites (Ca2+ and
phosphorus of PO4 group) probably increases the enone
moiety polarization. Consequently, the SꢀC bond forma-
tion is accelerated and the final product is obtained after
protonation of the resulting enolate.
In summary, a simple procedure and work-up, relatively
fast reaction rates, mild reaction condition, good yields,
and selectivity of the reaction make the fluorapatite an
attractive and useful catalyst for the Michael addition.
Scheme 2.
References
Table 1. Synthesis of products 3 by Michael addition
using FAP
1. (a) Ono, Y.; Baba, T. Catal. Today 1997, 38, 321; (b)
Loupy, A. Top. Curr. Chem. 1999, 206, 153.
2. (a) Trost, B. M. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Perga-
mon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4, p. 1; (b) Clark, J. H. Chem.
Rev. 1980, 80, 429.
Entry
Products
X
R
Yield/%
(time/min)a
3. (a) Bergmann, E. D.; Ginsburg, D.; Pappo, R. Org.
React. 1959, 10, 179; (b) Oare, D. A.; Heathcok, C. H. In
Topics in Stereochemistry; Eliel, Willen, S. H., Eds.;
Wiley: New York, 1989; Vol. 19, p. 277.
4. (a) Sebti, S.; Boukhal, H.; Hanafi, N.; Boulaajaj, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6207; (b) Abrouki, Y.;
Zahouily, M.; Rayadh, A.; Bahlaouan, B.; Sebti, S. Tet-
rahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8951; (c) Zahouily, M.;
Bahlaouan, B.; Solhy, A.; Ouammou, M.; Sebti, S. React.
Kinet. Catal. Lett. 2003, 78, 129.
5. (a) Bennazha, J.; Zahouily, M.; Sebti, S.; Boukari, A.;
Holt, E. M. Catal. Commun. 2001, 2, 101; (b) Zahouily,
M.; Abrouki, Y.; Rayadh, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
7729.
6. Sreekurnar, R.; Rugmimi, P.; Padmakumar, R. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6557.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
p-NO2
p-NO2
p-NO2
p-Cl
p-Cl
p-Cl
H
H
H
-Ph
96 (12)
93 (02)b
93 (60)
94 (15)
95 (07)
82 (60)
93 (25)
91 (08)
72 (60)
94(105)
94 (10)
57 (180)
-2-NH2Ph
-CH2-CO2Et
-Ph
-2-NH2Ph
-CH2-CO2Et
-Ph
-2-NH2Ph
-CH2-CO2Et
-Ph
-2-NH2Ph
-CH2-CO2Et
9
10
11
12
3j
3k
3m
p-OMe
p-OMe
p-OMe
a Yields in pure products isolated by recrystallization with AcOEt/
CH2Cl2 and identified by 1H, 13C NMR and IR spectroscopy.
b Reaction found 85% of 1,4-addition product and 15% of 1,3-addi-
tion product.