nitrogenous molecules presumed to belong to the prebiotic
building blocks of the natural purines,7 we came across the
structural and generational relationship depicted in Scheme
2. The analysis alludes to the existence of the title compound,
Scheme 3. Preparation and Derivatization of Purinoid 1a
Scheme 2. Structural and Generational Relationship between
2,6-Diaminopurine and a
2,6-Diamino-5,8-diaza-7,9-dicarba-purine
a Numbers in brackets denote mole equiv referring to starting
compound. Numbers before these brackets denote concentrations
in M. (a) 0.43 M (1.0 mole equiv) 3, 0.86 (2.0) 2, MeOH, rt, 2 h
f 45 °C, 3 h, 65%. (b) 0.24 (1.0) 4, (45) POCl3, 75 °C, 2 h f 110
°C, 3 h, 80%. (c) 1.6 (1.0) 5, 7.8 (5.0) 6, H2O, pH 1.6, rt, 48 h;
neutralization followed by chromatography on silica gel, maximally
21%. (d) 0.25 (1.0) 1, 4.0 (6.0) dimethylformamide dimethylacetal,
MeOH, rt, 7 days, 90%.
a heterocyclic system isomeric to the 2,6-diamino derivative
of the natural purines. The heterocycle caught our attention
because it can be expected to have the propensity of reacting
with aldosugars or aldosugar-derived iminium ions regiose-
lectively at carbon C-9 to form (C)-nucleosides that would
be isosteric to normal (N)-nucleosides of 2,6-diamino-purine.
This communication describes the preparation of the title
compound and reports exploratory examples of the smooth
occurrence of electrophilic substitution at carbon C-9 with
iminium ions.
The purinoid 1 was synthesized by two different routes
(Scheme 3).8 One of them, starting from N-formyl-glycine
ethyl ester 29 and biguanide 3,10 represents a preparatively
satisfactory and efficient procedure. According to known
lines of biguanide chemistry11 compounds 2 and 3 smoothly
condense in methanolic solution to the triazine derivative 4,
which on heating in POCl3 cyclizes to the purinoid 1 in up
to 82% yield. The product is obtained as a white solid. Its
1
expected constitution is supported by the H and 13C NMR
spectra,12 mass spectrum,13 and UV-absorption spectra
(Figure 1). For further characterization the purinoid was
converted to the bisamidine derivative 7, an easily soluble
crystalline compound (mp 137°, from MeOH) whose X-ray
structure analysis14 (Figure 2) corroborates the structure
assignment of the parent purinoid.
The alternative mode of formation for 1 follows more
closely the conceptual pattern depicted in Scheme 2 and,
therefore, is the one that had been explored first. However,
in retrospect, it turned out to be the less satisfactory route
from a preparative point of view. The hydrosulfate of the
deprotonated form of the (labile and oxygen-sensitive)
4-amino-imidazole15 5 reacts with sodium dicyanamide16 in
(5) Reist, E. J.; Fisher, L. V.; Goodman, L. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32,
2541. Altman, K.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7721. Rassu, G.; Pinna,
L.; Spanu, P.; Ulgheri, F.; Casiraghi, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 4019.
(6) Ha¨berle, A.; Leumann, C. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 489 and references
therein. Evans, G. B.; Furneaux, R. H.; Hutchinson, T. L.; Kezar, H. S.;
Morris, P. E., Jr.; Schramm, V. L.; Tyler, P. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
5723.
(7) Oro, J. Nature 1961, 190, 389. Ferris, J. P.; Hagan, W. J., Jr.
Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 1093 (review).
(8) A preparation of 1 had been previously attempted in the course of
an extended study of the chemistry of substituted 5,8-diaza-7,9-dicarba-
purine derivatives by Al-Shaar, A. H. M.; Chambers, R. K.; Gilmour, D.
W.; Lythgoe, D. J.; McClenaghan, I.; Ramsden, C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 2789.
1
(12) 1H and 13C NMR Data for 1. H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO(D6)):
6.14 ppm (s, 2H, NH2-(C6)), 6.44 ppm (s, 1H, H-(C9)), 7.95 ppm(s, 2H,
NH2-(C2)), 8.02 ppm(s, 1H, H-(C7)). 13C NMR (150.9 MHz, DMSO(D6)):
1
109.8 ppm (C9, correlates with signal at 6.44 ppm (H-(C9)) in H NMR),
122.1 (C7, correlates with 8.02 ppm (H-(C7)) in 1H NMR), 141.8 (C4),
1
149.3 (C6), 158.1 (C2). Assignments based on NOE, H-13C, and HMB
correlations.
(13) MS Data for 1. Electrospray-MS (pos.): 151 (100, [M + H]+),
301 (40, [2M + 1]+). Electrospray-MS (neg.): 149 (100, [M - H]-), 185
(100, [M + Cl]-).
(14) Carried out by Raj K. Chadha, TSRI. Crystallographic data for the
structure has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Center as deposition no. CCDC 180981. Copies of the data can be obtained,
free of charge, on application to the CCDC, 12 union Road, Cambridge
CB12 1EZ UK (fax, + 44 (1233) 336 0333; E-mail, deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Data for 7 in Supporting Information.
(9) Martin, K.; Matthews, H. R.; Rapoport, H.; Thyagarajan, G. J Org.
Chem. 1968, 33, 3758.
(10) Holter, S. N.; Fernlius, W. C. Inorg. Synth. 1963, 7, 58. Shirai, K.;
Sugino, K. J. Org. Chem. 1960, 25, 1045.
(11) Overberger, C. G.; Michelotti, F. W.; Carabateas, P. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1957, 941, 79.
(15) Rabinowitz, J. C. J. Biol Chem. 1956, 218, 175.
(16) Purchased from Aldrich, 96% purity.
2068
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 12, 2003