2822
R. Ramachandran et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 2819–2823
Table 2
Table 3
Antibacterial activity of compounds 9–24 against selected bacterial strains (MIC in
g/ml)
Antifungal activity of compounds 9–24 against selected fungal strains (MIC in lg/ml)
l
Compound
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in
lg/ml
Compound
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in lg/ml
C. neoformans C. albicans Rhizopus sp. A. niger A. flavus
S. aureus
B. Subtils
S. tyhpi
E. coli
K. pneumonia
9
100
25
25
200
50
25
—
200
100
25
100
100
200
200
50
200
6.25
50
6.25
100
—
100
—
200
100
50
100
50
25
—
200
50
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
50
50
100
25
25
100
100
100
50
50
25
25
50
25
100
25
50
100
12.5
200
12.5
50
100
50
100
—
100
6.25
100
50
200
100
25
200
50
100
100
100
50
100
—
50
—
25
25
50
25
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
100
100
50
6.25
25
200
12.5
25
25
25
100
200
50
100
50
200
200
—
50
50
6.25
6.25
25
25
100
200
100
200
100
6.25
6.25
6.25
50
—
200
200
100
12.5
6.25
6.25
50
100
100
6.25
50
50
25
50
50
—
12.5
50
100
100
25
50
100
50
25
200
100
25
25
—
100
50
50
6.25
100
6.25
100
25
6.25
100
50
12.5
12.5
100
100
50
50
100
100
50
200
100
25
100
Amphotericin B 25
25
Streptomycin
12.5
—, No inhibition even at maximum concentration.
—, No inhibition even at maximum concentration.
enhanced, respectively, by onefold rate. The compound 14, which
was inactive against A. flavus become potent by the cyclization of
thiosemicarbazone whereas 14 against C. neoformans, C. albicans
and Rhizopus sp. have registered minimum to moderate antifungal
activity. Due to modification of methyl analogue by methoxy group
in 14 and 22 (compounds 15, 16, 23 and 24) shows moderate activ-
ity against the entire tested fungal strains. Among the compounds
under the antifungal study, 9 against Rhizopus sp., 14, 16 and 23
against A. flavus, 15 against C. albicans and 17 and 22 against A. ni-
ger seldom show inhibition even at maximum concentration
activity at very low concentration (6.25 lg/ml). Besides, 18 against
S. typhi exhibit significant activity. Surprisingly replacement of
fluorine function by chlorine in 10, 11, 18 and 19 (compounds
12, 13, 20 and 21, respectively), compounds 12 against E. coli and
20 against S. typhi, were found to show superior activity than oth-
ers. However, 12 against B. subtilis and K. pneumonia shows a rever-
sal in activity, by two and three fold respectively, due to
replacement of fluorine by chlorine. Instead of halogens, methyl
or methoxy function substituted compounds 14 and 23 against S.
aureus and 24 against S. typhi markedly elevated the maximum
(200 lg/ml).
inhibition potency at minimum concentration (6.25 lg/ml).
In conclusion, we have synthesized a novel biologically impor-
tant thiosemicarbazones and their thiazolidinones. From the close
survey of the in vitro antibacterial and antifungal results against a
panel of microbial organisms revealed that the compound with
fluorine or chlorine substituents were found to be more active
against all the tested organisms.
The in vitro antifungal activity of the reported compounds 9-24
were examined with five fungal strains viz. Cryptococcus neofor-
mans (ATCC-3312), Candida albicans (ATCC-3122), Rhizopus sp.
(ATCC-2915), Aspergillus niger (ATCC-598) and Aspergillus flavus
(ATCC-485). Here, Amphotericin B was used as standard drug.
The obtained MIC values of the tested compounds and standard
are depicted in Table 3 that indicates all the tested compounds ex-
Acknowledgements
hibit a varied range 6.25–200
in compound 9 recorded minimum to moderate activity (100–
200 g/ml) against all the tested organisms except Rhizopus sp.
which did not show any inhibition potency even at maximum con-
centration at 200 g/ml whereas the same unsubstituted phenyl
lg/ml. Unsubstituted phenyl groups
We are thankful to Professor K. Pandiarajan, Head, Department
of Chemistry, Annamalai University for the facilities provided. We
also thank NMR Research Centre, IISc, Bangalore, for providing all
the NMR facilities to record NMR spectra. The authors place sincere
thanks to Mr. M. Karuppaiya, FEAT, Annamalai University for his
kind help in conducting screening studies.
l
l
group in thiazolidinone compound (17) shows one and twofold
enhancement in the antifungal activity against C. neoformans and
C. albicans, respectively. However, due to introduction of fluorine
functionality at the meta or para position of phenyl groups in 9
(compounds 10 and 11) noticed minimum to moderate inhibition
potency against all the tested fungal organisms with MIC ranging
Supplementary data
Complete experimental details and spectral data (IR, 1H NMR
and 13C NMR) for all the reported compounds data were given.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
from 6.25 to 100
lg/ml. In which, 10 against A. flavus shows supe-
rior inhibition potency at minimum concentration (6.25
lg/ml)
whereas thiazolidinone compounds 18 against C. albicans and 19
against C. neoformans, C. albicans and Rhizopus sp. exhibited well
pronounced activity. Unlike, 18 and 19 against A. niger exhibit
one third decrease the inhibition potency upon cyclization. Modi-
fication of fluorine substituent by chlorine in 10, 11, 18 and 19
(compounds 12, 13, 20 and 21, respectively) registered minimum
antifungal activity against all the used strains, except 20 and 21
which shows superior activity against Rhizopus sp. In addition, 19
against C. neoformans, C. albicans and A. niger and 21 against A. niger
produced considerable impact on antifungal activity. Replacement
of one proton by methyl analogue in 9 (compound 14) against C.
neoformans and Rhizopus sp., the activity was decreased and
References and notes
1. (a) Vicini, P.; Geronikaki, A.; Incerti, M.; Zani, F.; Dearden, J.; Hewitt, M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 3714; (b) Sonawane, N. D.; Verkman, A. S. Bioorg.
Med.Chem. 2008, 16, 8187; (c) Knutsen, L. J. S.; Hobbs, C. J.; Earnshaw, C. G.;
Fiumana, A.; Gilbert, J.; Mellor, S. L.; Radford, F.; Smith, N. J.; Birch, P. J.; Burley,
J. R.; Ward, S. D. C.; James, I. F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 662; (d)
Chaudhary, S. K.; Verma, M.; Chaturvedi, A. K.; Parmar, S. S. J. Pharm. Sci. 1974,
64, 614; (e) Dwivedi, C.; Gupta, T. K.; Parmar, S. S. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 553;
(f) Nagar, S.; Singh, H. H.; Sinha, J. N.; Parmar, S. S. J .Med. Chem. 1973, 16, 178.
2. Jeyaraman, R.; Avila, S. Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 149.
3. Lijinsky, W.; Taylor, H. W. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 16, 318.