4
Tetrahedron
In order to further extend the substrate scope we investigated
derivatives. It is presumed that C-O bond formation goes via
cationic ruthenium (IV) complex, formed in situ, and enables the
effective intermolecular oxygenations which proceeded with
excellent positional selectivity. The optimized catalyst SPS-Bpy
and SPS-DB-Bpy were found to be highly chemo-selective and
showed broad applicability in converting aromatic carboxylate
esters efficiently. These catalytic processes have additional
advantage in tolerating Lewis basic heterocyclic directing groups
and can be utilized in a broader way. Further extensions on the
detailed catalytic pathway are under investigation.
the feasibility of the reaction in presence of weakly coordinating
groups. Hydroxylation of benzoates tolerated a broad range of
substrates that neatly yielded their corresponding products with
moderate to high yields. It is surprising to note that the reaction
takes place at the more hindered site unlike that of the phenyl
pyridines (Fig 3, 3f, and 3g). The range of substrates extends
from moderate to strong electron donating as well as electron
accepting groups. However, there is a little difference in the yield
of substituted ethyl and methyl benzoates. We have emphasized
on the methyl benzoate derivatives as shown in the Fig 3.
Acknowledgments
The strong EWGs e.g fluorine (F) yielded higher in
comparison to EDGs e.g methoxy (OMe), methyl (Me) etc. With
increase in the strength of withdrawing group there is an increase
in the acidity of the proton ortho or para to it. The dual effect of
two withdrawing groups meta to each other in 3f, increases the
central C-H bonds acidity making it easier for the mesitoate
anion to abstract that proton. Although for 3e the electron pulling
effect is nullified due to the presence of F in the para position of
the ester, we still observe an increased yield for 3e compared to
3f. This can be accounted for the fact that hydroxylation of
methyl-3-fluorobenzoate is sterically hindered than methyl-
4fluorobenzoate. The steric factor overcomes the acidity factor in
this case.
SPS and SS thank DST Fast Track Young Scientist Project
(CS-83/2012) for funding. SS also thanks AcSIR for PhD
registration.
References and notes
1
2
3
Enthaler S, Company A. Chem Soc Rev. 2011; 40: 4902-4924;
Neufeldt SR, Sanford, MS. Acc Chem Res. 2012; 45: 936-946;
Engle KM, Mei T-S, Wasa M, Yu J-Q. Acc Chem Res. 2012;
45:788-802;
4
5
Tyman JHP. Synthetic and Natural Phenols; Elsevier: New York,
1996;
Based on previous report, a mechanistic pathway for C-H
oxygenation is proposed which is similar to ruthenium mediated
alkenylation.36 The reaction is expected to involve the common
Ru(II)-Ru(IV) catalytic cycle and passes through an intermediate
where a C-Ru-O bond is formed that undergoes oxidatively
induced reductive elimination to afford the final product (Fig-4)
Rappoport Z. The Chemistry of Phenols; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.:
Chichester UK. 2003;
6
7
Huang WY, Cai YZ, Zhang Y. Nutr Cancer. 2009; 62: 1-20;
Jintoku T, Nishimura K, Takaki K, Fujiwara Y. Chem Lett.1990;
19: 1687-1688;
8
Dong J, Liu P, Sun PJ. Org Chem. 2015; 80: 2925-2929;
Desai LV, Malik HA, Sanford MS. Org Lett. 2006; 8:1141-1144;
Zhang YH, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131: 14654-14655;
Thirunavukkarasu VS, Kozhushkov SI, Ackermann L. Chem
Comm. 2014; 50: 29-39;
.
hydroxy molecule and thereby regenerates the catalyst.
37,38 The external oxidant added helps in the incorporation of the
9
10
11
O
L
Ru
Mes
L1
O
12
13
Kozhushkov SI, Ackermann L. Chem Sci. 2013; 4: 886-896;
Arockiam PB, Bruneau C, Dixneuf PH. Chem Rev. 2012; 112:
5879-5918;
CF3COOH/(CF3CO)2O
14
15
Ackermann L. Chem Comm. 2010; 46: 4866-4877;
Sarkar SD, Liu W, Kozhushkov SI, Ackermann L. Adv Synth
Catal. 2014; 356: 1461-1479;
O
L
CF3
Ru
L1
O
N
N
16
Thirunavukkarasu VS, Hubrich J, Ackermann L. Org Lett.2012;
14: 4210-4213;
OH
O
S
L1
17
18
19
Padala K, Jeganmohan M. Chem Eur J. 2014; 20: 4092-4097;
Liu W, Ackermann L. Org Lett. 2013; 15: 3484-3486;
Yang X, Sun Y, Chen Z, Rao Y. Adv Synth Catal.2014; 356:
1625-1630;
OH
O
O
L
Ru
L1
L
O
N
N
O
O
Ru
H
CF3
L1
L
N
20
21
22
23
Yang Y, Lin Y, Rao Y. Org Lett.2012; 14: 2874-2877;
Yang X, Shan G, Rao Y. Org Lett.2013; 15: 2334-2337;
Padala K, Jeganmohan M. Chem Comm. 2013; 49: 9651-9653;
Thirunavukkarasu VS, Ackermann L. Org Lett.2012; 14: 6206-
6209;
O
Ru
O
S
OH
O
CF3COOH
Br
L-
24
25
26
27
Shan G, Han X, Lin Y, Yu S, Rao Y. Org Biomol Chem. 2013; 11:
2318-2322;
Br
L1-
N
N
or
N
N
Yang F, Rauch K, Kettelhoit K, Ackermann L. Angew Chem Int
Ed.2014; 53: 11285-11288;
Alvarez-Builla J, Vaquero JJ, Barluenga, J. Modern Heterocyclic
Chemistry, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim; 2011.
Ackermann L, Hofmann N, Vicente R. Org Lett. 2011; 13: 1875-
1877;
Figure-4: Representative proposed mechanism.
28
29
30
Ackermann L, Diers E, Manvar A. Org Lett.2012; 14: 1154.
Zhang F, Spring DR. Chem Soc Rev.2014; 43: 6906-6919;
Qu S, Dang Y, Song C, Wen M, Huang K-W, Wang Z-X. J Am
Chem Soc.2014; 136: 4974-4991;
Conclusions
In summary, this work presents ruthenium-catalyzed
hydroxylation of phenylpyridines and phenyl carboxylate
31
Srimani D, Ben-David Y, Milstein D. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;
52: 4012-4015;