C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Asymmetric Sulfinylation of t-BuOH by a Combination of
Various Arenesulfinyl Chlorides (1b-f) with HQA or QDA
cinchona
alkaloid
yield
(%)
ee
entry
Ar
2
(%)b
Figure 2. Proposed structures for the QDA/1a combination and the dynamic
kinetic resolution pathway to (S)-2a.
1a
2
Ph
HQA
QDA
HQA
QDA
HQA
QDA
HQA
QDA
HQA
QDA
(R)-2b
(S)-2b
(+)-2c
(-)-2c
(+)-2d
(-)-2d
(+)-2e
(-)-2e
(+)-2f
(-)-2f
88
93
73
78
74
70
74
78
72
68
83
88
84
88
96
99
94
93
92
92
3c
4a
5a
6a
7a
8
4-chlorophenyl
with 1a to stop the sulfinylation before completion gave 2a with
an enantioselectivity similar to that under the usual conditions (runs
7 and 19). The significantly high enantioselectivity observed in our
case could be explained by dynamic kinetic resolution,6 in which
the enantioselectivity depends on the rate of the alcohol with the
diastereomeric sulfinylammonium salts through rapid epimerization
on the sulfinyl stereocenter of the N-arenesulfinylammonium salt.
The proposed mechanism is shown in Figure 2, assuming that an
alcohol approaches from the direction opposite the sulfur-nitrogen
bond.
4-methoxyphenyl
4-methoxy-3-methylphenyl
2,4,6-trimethylphenyl
9a
10a
a The reaction was performed at -90 °C. b Determined by HPLC
analysis. c MeCN/CH2Cl2 (3/4) was used as a solvent.
also examined using the QDA/1a combination. While 1-adaman-
tanol was sulfinylated by the combination to give 1-adamantyl
p-toluenesulfinate (4a) with very high ee, asymmetric sulfinylation
of cyclohexanol and 9-fluorenol slightly lowered the enantioselec-
tivity (runs 16-18, 47-93% ee). Importantly, the optically pure
adamantyl sulfinate 4a was obtainable in a 63% overall yield from
1-adamantanol after single recrystallization from hexane (run 16
in parentheses). To examine the possibility of reusing the alkaloids,
we repeated the sulfinylation of t-BuOH using QDA recovered from
the first reaction mixture by acid-base extraction/short-column
chromatography (QDA was recovered in 80-90% yield). Formation
of (S)-2a having 86% ee demonstrates that recycling of QDA causes
no erosion in enantioselectivity of the combination (runs 7 and 20).
Having identified an asymmetric process, its scope was inves-
tigated with the aim of producing a general enantioselective
sulfinylation reaction. Table 2 shows the range of arenesulfinates
2b-f that can be formed by this method. t-BuOH reacts with a
combination of a variety of racemic arenesulfinyl chlorides5 1b-f
with HQA to form tert-butyl arenesulfinates 2b-f in good yield
and with high ee (up to 96% ee). The opposite enantiomer is also
accessible by using the QDA-derived combinations (up to 99% ee).
It should be noted that the cinchona alkaloid derivative and sulfinyl
chloride must be mixed prior to the addition of substrates to achieve
enantioselective sulfinylation. For example, after a mixture of
t-BuOH and QDA was stirred in CH2Cl2 at -78 °C for 30 min,
addition of 1a gave racemic 2a. This result gives useful information
on the reaction mechanism of this new sulfinylation procedure, since
the involvement of an alkaloid-alcohol complex in stereochemical
control seems to be ruled out. This has certain implications
regarding the N-arenesulfinylammonium salt, which must be taken
into account. Although the N-sulfinylammonium salt has not been
isolated yet, 1H NMR tentatively ascertained the structure. The 600
In summary, we have developed a highly enantioselective
preparation of chiral sulfinates based on the cinchona alkaloid/
sulfinyl chloride combination. Importantly, our process can have
access to both enantiomers of sulfinates depending on the cinchona
alkaloids via a dynamic kinetic resolution pathway in the sulfin-
ylation reaction. This new sulfinylation system will complement
or even substitute the most commonly used preparative method for
chiral sulfoxides through diastereomeric sulfinates.
Supporting Information Available: Text giving experimental
procedures, determination of the absolute stereochemistry of 2, and
compound characterization data. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) (a) Mikolajczk, M.; Drabowicz, J.; Kielbasinski, P. Chiral Sulfur Reagents;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1997. (b) Carren˜o, M. C. Chem. ReV. 1995,
95, 1717. (c) Toru, T.; Nakamura, S. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2002, 60,
115. (d) Nakamura, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Toru, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
1758. (e) Khiar, N.; Ferna´ndez, I.; Alcudia, A.; Alcudia, F. In AdVances
in Sulfur Chemistry 2; Rayner, C. M., Ed.; JAI Press: Stamford, CT,
2000; Chapter 3. (f) Matsugi, M.; Shibata, N.; Kita, Y. In AdVances in
Sulfur Chemistry 2; Rayner, C. M., Ed.; JAI Press: Stamford, CT, 2000;
Chapter 6.
(2) (a) Phillips, H. J. Chem. Soc. 1925, 127, 2552. (b) Ferna´ndez, I.; Khiar,
N.; Llera, J. M.; Alcudia, F. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6789. (c) Ferna´ndez,
I.; Khiar, N.; Roca, A.; Benabra, A.; Alcudia, A.; Espartero, J. L.; Alcudia,
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2029. (d) Khiar, N.; Arau´jo, C. S.; Alcudia,
F.; Ferna´ndez, I. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 345. (e) Alayrac, C.; Nowaczyk,
S.; Lemarie´, M.; Metzner, P. Synthesis 1999, 669. (f) Whitesell, J. K.;
Wong, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4552. (g) Whitesell, J. K.; Wong,
M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 597. (h) Mase, N.; Watanabe, Y.; Ueno,
Y.; Toru, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7794. (i) Watanabe, Y.; Mase, N.;
Tateyama, M.; Toru, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 737.
(3) (a) Drabowicz, J.; Lagedz, S.; Mikolajczyk, M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44,
5243. (b) Drabowicz, J.; Legedz, S.; Mikolajczyk, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1985, 1670. (c) Mikolajczyk, M.; Drabowicz, J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1974, 547. (d) Evans, J. W.; Fierman, M. B.; Miller, S.
J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8134.
(4) (a) Shibata, N.; Suzuki, E.; Takeuchi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
10728. (b) Shibata, N.; Suzuki, E.; Asahi, T.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 7001. (c) Shibata, N.; Ishimaru, T.; Suzuki, E.; Kirk, K.
L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2494. (d) Shibata, N.; Ishimaru, T.; Nakamura,
M.; Toru, T. Synlett 2004, 2509.
(5) (a) Youn, J. H.; Herrmann, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 27, 1493. (b)
Peyronneau, M.; Roques, N.; Mazieres, S.; Roux, C. L. Synlett 2003, 631.
(6) (a) Busu, A.; Gallagher, D. J.; Beak, P. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5718.
(b) Khiar, N.; Arau´jo, S. S.; Alcudia, F.; Ferna´ndez, I. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 345. (c) Balcells, D.; Maseras, F.; Khiar, N. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
2197. (d) Noyori, R.; Tokunaga, M.; Kitamura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn,
1995, 68, 36.
1
MHz H NMR spectrum of QDA in CDCl3 at room temperature
showed characteristic peaks at 2.72-2.95 ppm (4H, m) and 3.25
ppm (1H, dd, J ) 7.2, 8.8 Hz), whereas the spectrum of the QDA/1
combination (QDA:1 ) 1:1) displayed corresponding signals at
3.50-3.70 ppm (4H, m) and 3.30 ppm (1H, br q, J ) 8.5 Hz).
These signals could be assigned to R-protons of tertiary or
quaternary nitrogen, and the low-field shifts observed are attribut-
able to the cationic character of the ammonium salt. The enantio-
selectivity increased at lower reaction temperature (runs 7 and 8,
Table 1) and the reaction with much fewer equivalents of t-BuOH
JA0430189
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 5, 2005 1375