E. Roulland et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 4125–4128
Table 1. Chemical shifts of trans cyclopentenols 1 and 2 (ppm)
4127
Entry
H5b
H5a
H1
H2
H3
H4
1
2
2 l=
1 l=
1.95
1.77
2.07
1.91
4.96
4.78–4.92
6.05
5.94
5.96
5.85
3.35
2.85–3.10
Table 2. Observed and computed coupling constants for cyclopentenols 2 and 1
Entry
H1–H5a
H4–H5b
H4–H5a
H1–H5b
1
2
3
4
Coupling constants for 2
7.1 Hz
−28°
7 Hz
7.8 Hz
+155°
7.5 Hz
7.8 Hz
4.9 Hz
+35°
5.5 Hz
4.6 Hz
3.2 Hz
+91°
0 Hz
Calculated torsion angles for 2
Estimated coupling constants for 2
Coupling constants for 1
7.3 Hz
3.3 Hz
since it can be easily removed with cerium ammonium
nitrate or with smooth anodic oxidation.5b,c,d Our strat-
egy, based on a Claisen rearrangement followed by a
metathesis-based ring closure, provides an original
entry in the RCM-based preparation of five-membered
carbocycles and thus completes other preparations of
polysubstituted cycles previously reported.11 It is also
noteworthy that other carbocyclic nucleosides have
recently been constructed using metathesis strategy.2g
A very fast RCM reaction (less than 1 h) was observed,
consistent with the reported9 reaction speed for 1,6-
dien-3-ol. Separation of 2 and 15 was easily performed
by flash chromatography.
Acknowledgements
The 1H NMR study of the compounds 2 and 15
allowed us to assign their absolute stereochemistries.
The homoallylic protons H5a and H5b provided most of
the information. In Table 1, summarised are the 1H
NMR signals of compound 2. These values can be
compared with the reported signals of the related com-
pound 1.1b It is a general observation that chemical
shifts of the geminal H5-protons of cis-1,4-disubsti-
tuted-cyclopentenes present large differences, often in
the range of 1 ppm.10 On the other hand, this difference
does not usually exceed 0.3 ppm for the trans isomers.
As seen in Table 1, the differences between H5a and H5b
signals for products 2 and 1 are smaller than 0.3 ppm.
A further computer-based modelisation, using the ran-
dom search function (SYBYL 6.5/Tripos force field),
gave the conformer of lowest energy for compound 2.
From this, a calculation of the coupling constants could
be done and gave values similar to the observed one
(Table 2).
This work was financially supported by the Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique, the Institut
Curie and the Servier laboratories.
References
1. (a) Tanimori, S.; Tsubota, M.; He, M.; Nakayama, M.
Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2371–2378; (b) Asami, M.;
Takahashi, J.; Inoue, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5,
1649–1652.
2. For synthesis of (−)-carbovir, see: (a) Vince, R.;
Brownell, J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990, 168,
912–916; (b) Exall, A. M.; Jones, M. F.; Mo, C.-L.;
Myers, P. L.; Paternoster, I. L.; Singh, H.; Storer, R.;
Weingarten, G. G.; Williamson, C.; Brodie, A. C.; Cook,
J.; Lake, D. E.; Meerholz, C. A.; Turnbull, P. J.; High-
cock, R. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 2467–
2477; (c) Jones, M. F.; Myers, P. L.; Robertson, C. A.;
Storer R.; Williamson, C. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1
1991, 2479–2484; (d) Evans, C. T.; Roberts, S. M.;
Shoberu, K. A.; Sutherland, A. G. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 589–592; (e) Trost, B. M.; Li, L.; Guile, S.
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8745–8747; (f) Nokami,
J.; Matsuura, H.; Nakasima, K.; Shibata, S. Chem. Lett.
1994, 1071–1074 and references cited therein. For the
synthesis of abacavir, see: (g) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B.
W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4192–4193.
It is well known that Claisen rearrangements occur with
complete transfer of the chirality of the alcohol func-
tion as depicted in Figure 2. However, a confirmation
of this was achieved in our case by performing 1H
NMR experiments on cyclopentenol 2 in the presence
1
of chiral europium salt (Eu(hfc)3). Thus, since no H
signal split was observed, the high enantiomeric excess
of 2 was assessed.
3. Conclusion
3. Analytical data for compound 2. [h]2D5 −69 (c 0.2, CHCl3);
IR (CHCl3) 3596, 2917 cm−1 1H NMR (300 MHz,
;
The preparation of carbovir 3 reported by Asami et
CDCl3) l 1.95 (ddd, 1H), 2.07 (ddd, 1H), 3.35 (m, 1H),
3.77 (s, 3H), 3.82 (m, 2H), 4.96 (brs, 1H), 5.96 (m, 1H),
al.1b should be compatible with the protective group,