A general, ring closure metathesis based enantiospecific approach to polyfunctional eudesmane, eremophilane and agarofuran sesquiterpenoids

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01757-X

An enantiospecific and stereo- and functional group diversity oriented approach to eudesmane, eremophilane and agarofuran sesquiterpenoids from (-)-carvone has been devised. RCM has been employed as the key reaction to generate the highly functionalized eudesmane framework. Further elaboration of the eudesmane framework to agarofurans and biogenetic-type rearrangement to eremophilanes is outlined.

Full text of DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01757-X

TETRAHEDRON
LETTERS
Pergamon
Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7055–7059
A general, ring closure metathesis based enantiospecific approach
to polyfunctional eudesmane, eremophilane and agarofuran
sesquiterpenoids
Goverdhan Mehta* and R. Senthil Kumaran
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Received 4 June 2003; revised 7 July 2003; accepted 18 July 2003
Abstract—An enantiospecific and stereo- and functional group diversity oriented approach to eudesmane, eremophilane and
agarofuran sesquiterpenoids from (−)-carvone has been devised. RCM has been employed as the key reaction to generate the
highly functionalized eudesmane framework. Further elaboration of the eudesmane framework to agarofurans and biogenetic-type
rearrangement to eremophilanes is outlined.
© 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Eudesmane 1 and eremophilane 2 sesquiterpenoid
skeleta based on the bicyclic decalin framework are
fairly widespread in nature and occur in different stereo-
chemical and functionalization patterns.1 Eremophilane
2 represents the earliest known example of an irregular
isoprenoid in nature and in a classical proposal,
Robinson in 19392 invoked a carbonium ion-mediated
methyl migration in eudesmane 1 to explain their bio-
genesis which was subsequently confirmed through
both in vivo and in vitro experiments.3 Another inter-
esting sub-class of natural products derived from eudes-
polyfunctional agarofurans as well as biogenetic-type
rearrangement to the eremophilane framework.
The a,b-epoxyketone 6,8 readily obtained from (−)-car-
vone 5, on reductive allylation under dissolving metal
conditions charted an interesting course and epimeric
hydroxy-ketones 7 and 8 (45:55), sharing identical
stereo- chemistry at the newly generated quaternary
center were realized (Scheme 1).9 The epimeric nature
of the hydroxy-ketones followed from their oxidation
to the same dione 9 and their formation involving an
eventful
fragmentation-realdolization
process
is
manes are agarofurans
3 whose polyoxygenated
depicted in Scheme 1. It is worth noting that the allyl
group in 7 and 8 is cis with respect to the isopropenyl
group, a situation conducive to accessing eudesmane
based natural products which occur predominantly
with the angular methyl group and the isopropyl group
in a trans arrangement.
derivatives, e.g. celorbicol 4 are of wide occurrence,
particularly in the Celastraceae family and many of
them have been found to exhibit broad ranging biolog-
ical activity profiles.4,5 Not surprisingly, eudesmanes,
eremophilanes and particularly agarofurans continue to
evoke a great deal of synthetic interest and many
interesting strategies have been devised to access these
families of sesquiterpenoids.1,6 In particular, extensive
synthetic studies have been directed towards the poly-
hydroxylated agarofurans in view of their biological
potential and the challenge associated with the genera-
tion of the network of hydroxyl functionalities.6 Herein,
we describe a new, general, enantiospecific synthetic
approach towards eudesmanes from (−)-carvone 5
employing a ring closing metathesis (RCM) reaction7 as
the key step and their further elaboration towards
* Corresponding author. E-mail: gm@orgchem.iisc.ernet.in
0040-4039/$ - see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01757-X

7056
G. Mehta, R. S. Kumaran / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7055–7059
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) 30% H2O2, 6N NaOH, MeOH, 0°C, 92%; (ii) Li, liq. NH3, CH2ꢀCHCH2Br, Et2O, −78°C,
60%; (iii) PCC, DCM, 88%.
furnish the tertiary alcohol 16.9 Further epoxidation of
Addition of the Grignard reagent derived from 3-
16 was stereoselective but exhibited only 4:1 regioselec-
tivity and a 4:1 mixture of a-epoxides 17 and 18 was
obtained (Scheme 3). Exposure of the major epoxide 17
to BF3-etherate and hydrolysis of the intermediate enol-
benzoate 19, formed through sequential methyl and
hydrogen migrations, resulted in the eremophilane
keto-diol 20 in good yield (Scheme 3).9 The olefinic
moiety in 20 was further hydroxylated with OsO4 to
furnish polyfunctional eremophilane 21 whose
stereostructure was secured through single crystal X-ray
structure determination.10
chloro-1-butene to the major b-hydroxy-ketone 8 in the
presence of Ce(III) furnished two diastereomeric addi-
tion products 10 and 11 (55:45) (Scheme 2). Interest-
ingly, the Grignard reagent addition to the carbonyl
group of 8 was a-face selective to furnish 10 and 11
with the two allyl side arms in cis disposition. Both 10
and 11 were now set for the RCM reaction to generate
the eudesmane framework. Indeed, exposure of 10 and
11 to Grubbs’ catalyst [benzylidene-bis(tricyclo-
hexylphosphine)-dichlororuthenium] resulted in smooth
and efficient conversion to bicycles 12 and 13, respec-
tively (Scheme 2)9 and their stereostructures were
secured through the X-ray crystal structure determina-
tion of the PNB-derivative of 12.10 Thus, in a short
sequence from carvone 5, highly functionalized eudes-
manes 12 and 13 could be accessed, paving the way for
further transformations.
As per our plan, dihydroxyeudesmane derivative 13
appeared to be serviceable for elaboration to the agaro-
furan framework 3, particularly because the C4 b-
methyl stereochemistry present in it is widespread
among natural products of this class. However, in the
biologically more important agarofurans, the C9
hydroxyl group is usually a-oriented, see celorbicol 4.
Our first effort therefore was to carry out a Mitsunobu
type reaction on 13 to invert the C9 hydroxy group
stereochemistry but these efforts were not successful.
Consequently, 13 was oxidised to ketone 22 (X-ray
crystal structure)10 and its reduction with sodium boro-
Polyfunctional dihydroxyeudesmane 13 was well-poised
for further elaboration to the eremophilane ring system
2. The monobenzoate 14 derived from 13 was smoothly
and regioselectively dehydrated to the bicyclic triene 15
(Scheme 3).9 The exocyclic double bond in 15 could be
regioselectively hydrated through oxymercuration to
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) CH2ꢀCHCH(CH3)MgCl, anhyd. CeCl3, THF, −78°C, 95%; (ii) Grubbs’ cat. (7 mol%),
C6H6, 85°C, 89%; (iii) Grubbs’ cat. (5 mol%), C6H6, 85°C, 95%; (iv) p-NO2C6H4COCl, Et3N, DCM, rt, 90%.

G. Mehta, R. S. Kumaran / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7055–7059
7057
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) C6H5COCl, Et3N, DMAP, DCM, rt, 90%; (ii) SOCl2, pyridine, −35°C, 85%; (iii) Hg(OAc)2,
cat. AcOH, THF:H2O, rt, 75%; (iv) mCPBA, NaHCO3, DCM, 83%; (v) BF3·Et2O, DCM, 0°C, 80%; (vi) K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 95%;
(vii) OsO4, NMMO, CH3COCH3:H2O, rt, 92%.
hydride led to a readily separable 4:1 mixture of 13 and
23 was dehydrated to furnish triene 25 regioselectively
the epimeric diol 23. Although the stereoselectivity in
(Scheme 4). Oxymercuration of 25 was regioselective at
this reaction to access desired 23 was not satisfactory,
the terminal olefinic moiety and readily led to the
tertiaryalcohol 26.9 CatalyticOsO4-mediateddihydroxyl-
ation in 26 was stereoselective and acetonide protec-
13 could be recycled via 22 to build reasonable quanti-
ties of 23 (Scheme 4).9 Monobenzoate 24 derived from
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (i) PCC, DCM, rt, 78%; (ii) NaBH4, MeOH, 0°C, 90%; (iii) C6H5COCl, Et3N, DMAP, DCM,
rt, 87%; (iv) SOCl2, pyridine, −35°C, 80%; (v) Hg(OAc)2, cat. AcOH, THF:H2O, rt, 70%; (vi) (a) OsO4, NMMO,
CH3COCH3:H2O, rt, 95%; (b) CH3COCH3, Amberlyst, rt, 81%; (vii) mCPBA, NaHCO3, DCM, 90%; (viii) TMSOTf, DCM, 0°C,
55%.

7058
G. Mehta, R. S. Kumaran / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7055–7059
tion led to the polyfunctional 27 (Scheme 4). As the
a-face of 27 was sterically shielded, epoxidation of 27
was stereoselective and furnished exclusively the b-
epoxide 28. Brief exposure of 28 to TMSOTf led to the
contemplated tetrahydrofuran formation through epox-
ide opening and capture by the tertiary hydroxyl group
to lead to agarofuran derivative 29. The complete
stereostructure of 29 was confirmed through its X-ray
crystal structure determination.10 Access to the agaro-
furan 29 with secured stereochemistry at eight stereo-
genic centers and five oxygen functionalities,
particularly with C6 and C9 hydroxyl groups, makes
our approach amenable to adaptation for the synthesis
of many natural products of this family.
Weston, M.; Andrews, B. I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 769–771; (e) Xia, W. J.; Li, D. R.; Shi, L.; Tu, Y. Q.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 627–630; (f) Boyer, F.-D.;
Descoins, C. L.; Descoins, C.; Prange, T.; Ducrot, P.-H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8277–8279 and earlier papers
by this group.
7. (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, H. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
4413–4450; (b) Armstrong, S. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 371–388.
8. (a) McChesney, J. D.; Wycpalek, A. F. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1971, 542; (b) Szajewski, R. P. J. Org.
Chem. 1978, 43, 1819–1820.
9. All new compounds reported here were duly character-
1
ized on the basis of spectroscopic data (IR, H and 13C
NMR) and elemental analyses. Data for 29: mp 213–
In summary, we have outlined a new approach to
assemble rapidly, strategically functionalized eudes-
manes from (−)-carvone employing RCM as the key
step. Further transformations involving functional
group amplification and rearrangements provide entry
214°C; [h]D=−11.1 (c 0.45, CHCl3), IR (cm−1) 3438,
1
1711; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) l 8.06 (d, J=7.2 Hz,
2H), 7.58 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.10
(d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (br s, 1H), 4.30 (d, J=9.9 Hz,
1H), 3.91 (br s, -OH), 3.69 (d, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (ddd,
J=16.5, 7.5, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.46–2.43 (br m, -OH), 2.36–
2.20 (m, 2H), 1.99–1.93 (m, 2H), 1.79 (br s, -OH), 1.48 (s,
6H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.31 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (dd,
J=12.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) l 166.1, 132.9,
130.4, 129.7, 128.5, 83.5, 79.7, 76.9, 75.9, 75.8, 65.9, 47.8,
46.9, 45.4, 35.8, 30.6, 25.5, 25.3, 25.1, 14.9; HRMS calcd
for 413.1940 (M+Na). Found: 413.1945. 28: [h]D=−19.0
(c 1.0, CHCl3); IR (cm−1) 3452, 1718, 1273; 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3) l 8.03 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t,
J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 2H), 4.96 (dd, J=
11.7, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.51–4.44 (m, 1H), 4.18–4.16 (m, 1H),
3.13 (s, 1H), 2.19–1.92 (m, 4H), 1.77–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.52
(s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.22 (d,
J=7.8 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) l
165.9, 133.1, 130.2, 129.6, 128.4, 107.9, 79.5, 75.9, 72.1,
71.3, 65.4, 64.2, 44.8, 38.8, 37.6, 32.3, 28.5, 26.2, 26.1,
24.0, 19.8, 16.0; HRMS calcd for 453.2253 (M+Na).
Found 453.2291. 26: mp 146.5–147.5°C; [h]D=−4.1 (c
into
polyoxyfunctionalized
eremophilanes
and
agarofurans.
Acknowledgements
We thank JNCASR for the financial support. One of us
(R.S.K.) thanks CSIR for the award of a research
fellowship.
References
1. Reviews: (a) Fraga, B. M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19,
650–672 and earlier contributions by the same author in
this review series. (b) Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep.
2002, 19, 1–48 and earlier contributions by the same
author in this review series.
1
1.2, CHCl3); IR (cm−1) 3351, 1715, 1273; H NMR (300
2. (a) Cited in: Penfold, A. R.; Simonsen, J. L. J. Chem.
Soc. 1939, 87–89; (b) Robinson, R. Structural Relations
of Natural Products; Oxford University Press: London,
1955; p. 12.
3. (a) Miller, C. A.; Pinder, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1977, 230–231; (b) Ceccherelli, P.; Curini, P.;
Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O. Tetrahedron 1989, 45,
3809–3818.
4. For a recent review, see: Spivey, A. C.; Weston, M.;
Woodhead, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 43–59.
5. Selected examples of agarofuran natural products, see: (a)
Maheshwari, M. L.; Jain, T. C.; Bates, R. B.; Bhat-
tacharyya, S. C. Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 1079–1090; (b)
Maheshwari, M. L.; Varma, K. R.; Bhattacharyya, S. C.
Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 1519–1525; (c) Bruning, R.; Wag-
ner, H. Phytochemistry 1978, 17, 1821–1858; (d) Kim, S.
E.; Kim, Y. H.; Lee, J. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 108–111.
6. For some recent references towards the synthesis of
agarofurans: (a) White, J. D.; Shin, H.; Kim, T.-S.;
Cutshall, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2404–2419;
(b) Tu, Y. Q.; Sun, L. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
7935–7938; (c) Zhou, G.; Gao, X.; Li, W. Z.; Li, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3101–3103 and earlier contri-
butions of this group; (d) Spivey, A. C.; Woodhead, S. J.;
MHz, CDCl3) l 8.06 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (t, J=7.5
Hz, 1H), 7.46 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (s, 2H), 5.64 (s,
1H), 5.22 (dd, J=12.3, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.97 (d, J=6.9 Hz,
1H), 2.43–2.38 (m, 2H), 2.18 (dd, J=4.5, 3.6 Hz, 1H),
2.02–1.98 (m, 1H), 1.51 (q, J=12 Hz, 1H), 1.25 (d, J=7.5
Hz, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 1.23 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H); 13C
NMR (75 MHz) l 166.4, 146.1, 132.9, 132.2, 130.6,
129.5, 128.4, 123.8, 122.2, 79.3, 72.4, 46.0, 39.7, 38.9,
34.9, 27.9, 27.1, 25.9, 24.8, 21.4; HRMS calcd for
363.1936 (M+Na), Found 363.1970. 21: mp 189–191°C;
[h]D=−42.8 (c 1.05, MeOH); IR (cm−1) 3413, 1696, 1025;
1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOH-d4) l 4.06 (s, 1H), 3.87 (d,
J=2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.25–3.17 (m, 2H), 2.67 (t, J=13.5 Hz,
1H), 2.34–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.51 (dt,
J=13.5, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d,
J=6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.54 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) l
216.7, 74.2, 73.7, 72.0, 69.7, 47.5, 46.6, 44.9, 38.1, 35.7,
28.8, 28.4, 27.6, 14.0, 10.5; HRMS calcd for 309.1678
(M+Na). Found 309.1692. 17: [h]D=−62.5 (c 1.2,
CHCl3); IR (cm−1) 3479, 1717, 1275; 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) l 8.03 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (t, J=6.9
Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 5.67–5.62 (br s, 2H),
5.24 (dd, J=12, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (d, J=3 Hz, 1H),
2.29–1.96 (m, 3H), 1.91–1.87 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.67 (m, 1H),

G. Mehta, R. S. Kumaran / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7055–7059
1.43 (s, 3H), 1.40 (s, 3H), 1.30 (s, 3H), 1.24 (d, J=7.8 Hz,
7059
3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) l 165.9, 132.9, 130.6, 129.5,
128.4, 123.4, 76.6, 74.2, 66.3, 58.9, 41.8, 39.0, 35.9, 34.2,
27.9, 27.7, 23.7, 18.5, 16.5; HRMS calcd for 379.1885
(M+Na). Found 379.1907. 16: [h]D=−33.1 (c=1.0,
CHCl3); IR (cm−1) 3489, 1715, 1275; 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) l 8.06 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (d, J=6.6
Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 5.60 (s,
2H), 5.16 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 1H),
2.38 (br s, 1H), 2.17–2.12 (m, 1H), 1.99–1.95 (m, 3H),
1.31 (s, 6H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.25 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C
NMR (75 MHz) l 166.3, 145.8, 132.8, 131.5, 129.5,
128.4, 122.8, 121.7, 78.0, 73.3, 44.8, 37.8, 37.6, 37.0, 27.9,
27.6, 25.6, 24.2, 21.0; HRMS calcd for 363.1936 (M+Na).
Found 363.1956. 13: [h]D=−66.2 (c 0.8, CHCl3); IR
Compound 22: C15H22O2, MW=234.34, colorless crystal,
crystal system: monoclinic, space group: P2(1), cell
,
parameters: a=10.305(2), b=10.916(2), c=12.805(3) A,
1
(cm−1) 3321, 1455; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) l 5.63–
3
,
i=108.436(4), V=1366.75(6) A , Z=4, Dcalcd=1.139 g
cm−3, F(000)=512.0, v=0.07 mm−1. Total number of l.s.
parameters=315, R1=0.0565 for 4301, Fo>4|(Fo) and
0.0739 for all 5368 data. WR2=0.1254, GOF=1.106,
restrained GOF=1.106 for all data. There are two
molecules in an asymmetric unit. (CCDC 214304).
5.60 (m, 1H), 5.48–5.46 (m, 1H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 3.59–3.55
(m, 1H), 3.14–3.07 (br s, -OH), 2.75–2.72 (m, 1H), 2.18–
2.12 (m, 2H), 1.81–1.63 (m, 4H), 1.74 (s, 3H), 1.46 (dd,
J=8.7, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 1.21 (s, 3H), 1.15 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 3H);
13C NMR (75 MHz) l 149.2, 131.4, 121.0, 109.0, 78.5,
75.7, 43.5, 42.2, 39.3, 35.5, 34.0, 33.9, 21.1, 21.0, 16.0;
HRMS calcd for 259.1674 (M+Na). Found 259.1695. 12:
Compound 29: C22H30O6, MW=390.48, crystal system:
monoclinic, space group: P2(1), cell parameters: a=
1
[h]D=+75.9 (c=0.83, CHCl3); IR (cm−1) 3343, 1455; H
,
8.198(2), b=15.354(4), c=16.138 (4) A, i=94.364 (5),
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) l 5.47 (br s, 1H), 5.36 (d,
J=9.9 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (s, 2H), 3.63 (br s, 1H), 3.09 (d,
J=6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.97 (s, 1H), 2.68–2.65 (m, 1H), 2.45 (m,
1H), 2.18 (d, J=17.7 Hz, 1H), 1.84–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.75 (s,
3H), 1.31–1.23 (m, 1H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 0.99 (d, J=7.5 Hz,
3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) l 149.5, 130.6, 122.8, 109.1,
77.4, 76.1, 39.2, 38.5, 36.1, 33.9, 33.5, 31.9, 20.9, 18.8,
13.2; HRMS calcd for 259.1674 (M+Na). Found
259.1683.
3
V=2025.55 A , Z=4, Dcalcd=1.28 g cm−3, F(000)=
,
840.0, v=0.09 mm−1. Total number of l.s. parameters=
239, R1=0.0897 for 5614, Fo>4|(Fo) and 0.1226 for all
7976 data. wR2=0.2182, GOF=1.025, Restrained
GOF=1.025 for all data. There are two molecules in an
asymmetric unit. (CCDC 214305).
10. X-Ray crystal structure determination: X-ray data were
collected at 293 K on a SMART CCD–BRUKER dif-
fractometer with graphite monochromated MoKa radia-
,
tion (u=0.7107 A). Structure was solved by direct
methods (SIR92). Refinement was by full-matrix least-
squares procedures on F2 using SHELXL-97. The non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically whereas
hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically. Compound
PNB derivative of 12: C22H27O5N, MW=385.45, crystal
system: monoclinic, space group: P2(1), cell parameters:
,
a=8.265 (2), b=13.123 (3), c=18.829(5) A, i=
3
94.113(5), V=2037.09(6) A , Z=4, Dcalcd=1.257 g cm−3
,
,
F(000)=824.0, v=0.09 mm−1. Total number of l.s.
parameters=721, R1=0.0576 for 6673, Fo>4|(Fo) and
0.0797 for all 8820 data. WR2=0.1213, GOF=1.123.
Restrained GOF=1.123 for all data. There are two
molecules in an asymmetric unit. An ORTEP diagram
with only one molecule is shown in Scheme 2. (CCDC
214302). Compound 21: C15H26O5, MW=286.37, color-
less crystal, Crystal system: monoclinic, space group:
P2(1), cell parameters: a=7.6151(6), b=12.361(1), c=
3
16.356(1) A, V=1539.76 A , Z=4, Dcalcd=1.235 g cm−3
,
,
,
F(000)=624.0, v=0.09 mm−1. Total number of l.s.
parameters=285, R1=0.0385 for 2927, Fo>4|(Fo) and
0.0417 for all 53125 data. WR2=0.0925, GOF=1.086.
Restrained GOF=1.086 for all data (CCDC 214303).