H. Lee et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 5544–5547
5545
COOH
NO2
CO2Me
NO2
CHO
NO2
O
O
O
O
c
d
a
b
NO2
CN
NO2
COOH
CO2Me
CHO
9
6
7
8
5
CHO
CF3
OH
CF3
OH
CHO
e
g
f
CN
10
NO2
CN
NO2
CN
12
NH2
11
CF3
OH
H
N
h
i
3
CN
NH
O
CN
O
4
13
Scheme 1. Synthesis of CDPE-TFA 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, MeOH, 0 °C?reflux, 5 h, 76%; (b) 1.5 M DIBAL in toluene, toluene, À78 °C, 5 min, 84%; (c) 1,3-
propanediol, p-TsOH, benzene, reflux, 2 h, 47%; (d) benzyl cyanide, 1.0 M t-BuOK in THF, t-BuOH/THF, 50 °C, 30 min, 72%; (e) 11-N HCl/THF (1:1), 25 °C, 30 min, 76%; (f) CsF,
TMSCF3, DME, 0 °C?25 °C, 3 h, 88%; (g) SnCl2ÁH2O, EtOAc, 70 °C, 20 min, 76%; (h) EtCOCl, K2CO3, THF, 25 °C, 63%; (i) 1,10-phenanthroline, CuCl, 1,2-diethoxyhydrazine, K2CO3,
THF, 70 °C, 50 min, 70%.
trifluoroacetyl unit. By changing the N-acyl group, we may further
functionalize CDPE-TFA 3.
The fluorescence data collected in Figure 1a compare the rela-
tive intensity at the given guest concentration, showing that CNÀ
is the most efficient quencher among the anions examined, then
AcOÀ and FÀ follow, and other anions show little changes. The
emission response depending on the anions is similar with the ten-
dency observed previously in the case of DATFA 2.7 Formation of
the anionic adduct between 3 and an anion (AÀ) will be dependent
on the anion’s carbonyl carboÀn affinitÀy, which is in the order:
The photophysical properties of CDPE-TFA 3 were evaluated in
CH3CN: Its absorption spectrum displayed two absorption maxima
at kmax = 223 and 331 nm (e
= 14,680 MÀ1 dmÀ1), characteristic
peaks of the CDPE moiety.9 When excited at kex = 331 nm, probe
3 emitted fluorescence at kmax = 476 nm.
We evaluated the sensing ability of 3 toward anions such as FÀ,
ClÀ, IÀ, CNÀ, SCNÀ, AcOÀ, H2PO4À, HSO4À, and ClO4 as their Bu4N+
CNÀ ꢀ AcOÀ > FÀ > H2PO À, Cl , I , CN , SCN , HSO4À, and ClO4
.
À
À
À
À
4
salts. The fluorescence spectra were recorded at kex = 331 nm by
adding increasing amounts of each anion to CDPE-TFA 3, both dis-
solved in acetonitrile at 25 °C. In most cases, we observed little
changes in the fluorescence intensity except for CNÀ, FÀ, and AcOÀ
anions (Fig. 1a).
O
Et
O
Et
N
N
A
H
O
H
O
CN
CN
A
F3C
CF3
Characterization data of selected compounds. Compound 8: mp 96.1–96.3 °C
(CH2Cl2/hexanes = 1/5); Rf = 0.36 (hexanes/EtOAc = 4/1); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
10.0 (s, 1H), 8.23 (s, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (s, 1H),
4.20 (dd, J = 5.8, 5.2 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (td, J = 9.8, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 2.08–2.21 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d,
J = 13.9 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 189.7, 189.6, 148.8, 137.7, 137.0, 132.8,
128.8, 124.7, 96.5, 67.7, 25.5; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C11H11NO5 (M+H+): 238.0715;
found, 238.0721. Compound 9: mp = 136.8–137.5 °C (hexanes/CH2Cl2 = 5/1); Rf = 0.23
(hexanes/EtOAc = 9/1); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.20 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.7 Hz,
1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.44–7.49 (m, 3H),
6.09 (s, 1H), 4.24 (dd, J = 5.8, 5.2 Hz, 2H), 4.00 (td, J = 9.8, 2.3 Hz, 2H), 2.15–2.23 (m,
1H), 1.46 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 148.6, 138.6, 135.2, 134.0,
133.5, 132.3, 130.1, 129.3, 128.7, 126.3, 124.9, 117.1, 115.2, 96.8, 67.8, 25.7; MS (EI)
An anionic adduct
(adduct I: A = CN)
3
As it was pointed out in the previous works,7,8b the trifluoroace-
tyl group in probe 3 is also intramolecularly hydrogen bonded as
its alkoxide adduct; however, the latter adduct is more stabilized
by its stronger ‘charged’ hydrogen bonding than the case in which
such intramolecular hydrogen bonding is absent. Thus, the fluores-
cence titration results suggest that the anionic adduct is responsi-
ble for the fluorescence quenching. The adduct formation can be
readily characterized by spectroscopic titrations, as already con-
firmed for the CATFA analogues in the previous works. 19F NMR
titrations provided a clear evidence for the adduct formation: As
expected, the CF3 group in the probe 3 appeared as singlet at
4.3 ppm, shifted to À6.4 ppm (singlet) upon addition of 1.0 equiv
of CNÀ (as Bu4N+ salt) in CD3CN. Also, only both the probe 3 and
the adduct peaks appeared with little chemical shifts when 0.5
equiv of the anion was added.
m/z calcd for
mp = 160.7–161.5 °C (hexanes/CH2Cl2 = 5:1); Rf = 0.18 (hexanes/EtOAc = 4/1); 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3 + DMSO) 8.39 (s, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d,
C
19H16N2O4 (M+): 336.1110; found, 336.1112. Compound 11:
d
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.42–7.51 (m, 3H), 6.69 (d,
J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (m, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3 + DMSO) d 148.1,
137.8, 134.8, 132.7, 132.3, 131.3, 130.1, 129.6, 128.7, 125.6, 124.6, 121.8, 116.5, 114.8,
66.1, 65.6, 65.2, 64.8 (q, J = 32.3 Hz, CF3); 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3 + DMSO) d À0.97;
MS (EI) m/z calcd for
C
17H11F3N2O3 (M+): 348.07; found, 348.07. Compound 3:
mp = 116.0–116.7 °C (hexanes/CH2Cl2 = 4:1); Rf = 0.36 (hexanes/EtOAc = 7/3); 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 11.0 (s, 1H), 9.18 (s, 1H), 8.07 (dd, J = 6.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.93
(dd, J = 6.9, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (m, 2H), 7.57 (s, 1H), 7.45–7.48 (m, 3H), 2.55 (q,
J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 183.4, 182.9,
182.5, 182.0 (q, J = 34.7 Hz, –COCF3), 173.6, 144.1, 142.3, 139.7, 133.6, 132.63, 132.58,
132.52, 132.47 (q, J = 4.7 Hz (coupled with F), aromatic-C), 130.4, 129.4, 126.5, 122.8,
122.4, 121.5, 118.5, 116.8, 115.5, 114.7 (q, J = 99.3 Hz, –CF3), 117.1, 110.8, 31.9, 9.5;
19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3) d 6.82; MS (EI) m/z calcd for C20H15F3N2O2 (M+): 372.1086;
found, 372.1082. Compound 4: mp = 127.9–128.2 °C (hexanes/CH2Cl2 = 4/1); Rf = 0.36
(hexanes/EtOAc = 3/2); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.68–7.58 (m, 4H),
7.53–7.36 (m, 6H), 2.42 (q, 2H), 1.25 (t, 3H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 172.6,
142.1, 138.8, 134.6, 134.4, 129.8, 129.5, 129.3, 126.2, 125.1, 122.0, 120.2, 118.1, 112.2,
30.9, 9.8; MS (EI) m/z calcd for C18H16N2O (M+): 276.1263; found, 276.1265.
The fluorescence titration of probe 3 with CNÀ (0–30 equiv)
gave an interesting quenching result, as inferred from a plot of
F/F0 versus equivalent of the cyanide ion. The plot can be divided
into two regions in which fluorescence response is different (Fig.
2): A nonlinear change up to 3 equiv of cyanide and a linear change
after that point. In the former region, two different species, 3 and
its cyanide adduct I, seem to be contributing to the fluorescence
intensity observed, resulting in the nonlinear change. In the latter