L. Banfi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7655–7658
7657
References
11. Conformational analyses were carried out at the Institute
of Molecular Pharmacy, Pharmacenter of the University
of Basel, and would have not been possible without the
precious collaboration of Professor Beat Ernst and
Samuel Schmid. They have been performed on a Silicon
Graphics O2 console, using the program MacroModel,12
version 5.0. TNCG (Truncated Newton Conjugate Gradi-
ent)13 and Amber* force field (Amber all-atom force
field) have been used for the minimization steps, while
unconstrained Monte Carlo/energy minimisation (MC/
EM)14 has been applied for the conformational search
(ring closures have been defined for each ring, when these
were not automatically defined). At least 2,000 conforma-
tions were generated for each analysis, only those with
energy not exceeding 50 kJ/mol from the global minimum
being taken into consideration. Each conformation was
minimized (500 iterations) and only those having a gradi-
1. (a) Haubner, R.; Finsinger, D.; Kessler, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1375–1389; (b)
Dechantsreiter, M. A.; Planker, E.; Matha¨, B.; Lohof, E.;
Ho¨lzemann, G.; Jonczyk, A.; Goodmann, S. L.; Kessler,
H. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3033–3040.
2. Golebiowski, A.; Jozwik, J.; Klopfenstein, S. R.; Colson,
A. O.; Grieb, A. L.; Russell, A. F.; Rastogi, V. L.; Diven,
C. F.; Portlock, D. E.; Chen, J. J. J. Comb. Chem. 2002,
4, 584–590.
3. (a) Hanessian, S.; McNaughton-Smith, G.; Lombart, H.-
G.; Lubell, W. D. Tetrahedron 1997, 38, 12789–12854; (b)
Belvisi, L.; Bernardi, A.; Checchia, A.; Manzoni, L.;
Potenza, D.; Scolastico, C.; Castorina, M.; Cupelli, A.;
Giannini, G.; Carminati, P.; Pisano, C. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 1001–1004; (c) Belvisi, L.; Caporale, A.; Colombo, M.;
Manzoni, L.; Potenza, D.; Scolastico, C.; Castorina, M.;
Cati, M.; Giannini, G.; Pisano, C. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002,
85, 4353–4368.
4. (a) Freidinger, R. M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3631–3633;
(b) Piscopio, A. D.; Miller, J. F.; Koch, K. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 8189–8198; (c) Weber, K.; Ohnmacht, U.;
Gmeiner, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7406–7416.
5. Fink, B. E.; Kym, P. R.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4334–4344.
,
ent 50.01 kJ/A mol were considered. Analyses in water
and chloroform were carried out using the solvation
model by Still (GB/SA, Generalised Born/Solvent Acces-
sible Surface Area).15
12. Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.;
Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hen-
drickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11,
440–467.
6. (a) Vo-Thanh, G.; Boucard, V.; Sauriat-Dorizon, H.;
Guibe´, F. Synlett 2001, 37–40; (b) Creighton, C. J.; Reitz,
A. B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 893–895.
7. (a) Wilson, S. R.; Sawicki, R. A. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
1982, 19, 81–83; (b) Kahn, M.; Devens, B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4841–4844; (c) Evans, P. A.; Holmes, A.
B.; Russell, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6857–6858.
8. Wilson, S. R.; Sawicki, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44,
330–336.
13. Ponder, J. W.; Richards, F. M. J. Comput. Chem. 1989,
8, 1016–1024.
14. Chang, G.; Guida, W. C.; Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 4379–4386.
15. Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6127–6129.
16. (a) Do¨mling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3169–3210; (b) Do¨mling, A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2002, 6, 306–313.
9. Hoffmann, T.; Waibel, R.; Gmeiner, P. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 62–69.
17. (a) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001,
34, 18–29; (b) Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 3012–3043.
18. Isocyanide 3 was prepared from commercially available
diethyl formamido malonate: (a) NaH, DMF, rt, 95%;
(b) 0.13 M NaOH in EtOH, rt; (c) dioxane, reflux, 79%;
(d) POCl3, Et3N, CH2Cl2, −30°C, 92%.
19. Isocyanide 4 was prepared from t-butyl isocyanoacetate
as described.20 In our hands the yields were not higher
than 40%.
20. Scho¨llkopf, U.; Hoppe, D.; Jentsch, R. Chem. Ber. 1975,
108, 1580–1592.
21. In some cases by using MeOH and isocyanide 3 we
observed various degrees of transesterification. Thus we
now prefer to use EtOH for reactions involving 3.
22. All new compounds were fully characterized by 1H and
13C NMR, IR, GC–MS (when possible) and elemental
analysis.
23. While the two diastereoisomers were usually well sepa-
rated by silica gel chromatography using petroleum ether/
AcOEt eluents (with the exceptions of 6h and 6i),
complete removal of intermolecular products was in some
cases troublesome and required 2–3 subsequent chro-
matographies with different eluents.
10. Conformational analysis11 carried out on compound 7
(cis isomer) in chloroform showed that in 70% of the
conformations not exceeding 12.57 kJ/mol from the
global minimum, a hydrogen bond between Oai and
Nai+3, typical of a reverse turn, was present. The remain-
ing conformations had either a hydrogen bond between
Oai and Nai+2 (10%) or between Oai+1 and Nai+3 (20%).
In water the percentage of considered conformations
characterized by a hydrogen bond decreased from 100 to
55%, but 44% of them still had the H-bond between Oai
and Nai+3. The b virtual dihedral angle (CaiꢁCai+1ꢁCai+
2ꢁNi+3) was optimal for a reverse turn in 67 or 60% of the
conformations considered, respectively, in water and
chloroform. For the trans epimer of 7 the situation was
far less favorable. No considered conformation possess-
ing a H-bond between Oai and Nai+3 was found. The
epimer of 7 also turned out to be generally less stable and
more flexible than 7.
24. The trans isomer of 6f showed a remarkable 20% NOE
on the NH when irradiating the CH3 bonded at C-3. This
is clearly possible only for this diastereoisomer and only
if the cyclic amide is in an anti conformation. On the