A R T I C L E S
Heathcock et al.
Scheme 2 a
Scheme 3 a
a (a) TMSA, n-BuLi, BF3‚OEt2, THF, -78 °C; (b) PPTS, MeOH/THF;
(c) K2CO3, MeOH, THF; (d) PivCl, pyridine, CH2Cl2; (e) 9-Br-BBN,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C, then AcOH; (f) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF; (g) DIBAL-H,
toluene, -78 °C; (h) TESCl, EtNiPr2, DMF; (i) t-BuLi, THF, -78 °C, then
MgBr2‚OEt2.
primary hydroxyl of the resulting alkynediol 12 was then
selectively acylated with pivaloyl chloride, and the vinyl
bromide was introduced by bromoboration6 of the alkyne.
Subsequent protection of the secondary hydroxyl of 13 as a TBS
ether, followed by DIBAL-H mediated cleavage of the pivaloyl
group and reprotection of the primary alcohol as a TES ether,
provided vinyl bromide 6.7 The Grignard reagent 6a, required
for coupling with the EF bis-pyran subunit, was available by
successive treatment with tert-butyllithium and magnesium
bromide etherate.
The union of the bis-pyran subunit 10 with the functionalized
Grignard reagent 19 was performed as shown in Scheme 3.
Oxidation of the primary alcohol 11 under Moffat-Swern
conditions8 yielded a rather unstable aldehyde, which was used
in crude form. Treatment of the oxidation reaction mixture with
an excess of Grignard reagent 6a afforded the desired alcohol
15 in 87% yield as a single diastereomer. Although the
configuration of the product alcohol was assumed to be that
shown, based on literature precedent9 for similar additions of
vinyl Grignard reagents to aldehydes, the stereochemical
outcome of this transformation was ultimately inconsequential
because the ensuing synthetic steps would eliminate this
stereocenter. Along these lines, formylation using Katritzky’s
N-formylbenzotriazole10 provided the allylic formate 16 in 98%
yield and set the stage for a deoxygenation reaction in which it
was required that the exoskeletal position of the alkene was
maintained. We sought to accomplish this goal by a modification
of the π-allyl reduction method of Tsuji.11 Through systematic
investigation, it was found that less polar solvents in combination
with a high ratio of tributylphosphine to palladium (200:1) gave
a >20:1 ratio of the desired exoskeletal alkene 17, relative to
the internal alkene isomer. The observed effect of the excess
exogenous ligand on the ratio of alkene products suggests that
greater steric bulk at the palladium promotes intramolecular
a (a) (COCl), DMSO, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, then EtNiPr2; (b) Grignard 6a,
THF, -78 °C; (c) N-formylbenzotriazole, EtNiPr2, DMAP, CH2Cl2; (d) 10
mol % Pd(PPh3)4, 2000 mol % Bu3P; ammonium formate, cyclohexane,
80 °C; (e) DDQ, CH2Cl2/pH 7 buffer, 89%; (f) Ph3P‚HBr,MeOH/THF, 0
°C; (g) TESCl, imidazole, DMF.
hydride transfer to the more substituted position, leaving the
Pd coordinated to the less substituted double bond. Under the
optimized reaction conditions, deoxygenation occurred ef-
ficiently to give alkene 17 in 86% yield, together with a minor
1
side product, the H NMR spectrum of which was consistent
with loss of the TES protecting group. Treatment of the
recovered primary alcohol with TESCl led to an additional 4%
of alkene 17 and brought the total yield up to 90%. Thus, the
Grignard addition, allylic deoxygenation protocol gives alkene
17 in 77% overall yield for the three steps.
Having demonstrated a successful approach to a C29-C48
fragment 17 of the altohyrtins, effort was then focused on the
elaboration of this substrate to include the three carbons atoms
that form the end of the triene side chain of altohyrtin C. A
concern at this point, however, was the stability of a fully formed
diene functionality to the oxidative conditions necessary to effect
removal of the three PMB groups at a late stage in the synthesis.
Indeed, our studies on model systems12 had indicated competing
(6) (a) Hara, S.; Dojo, H.; Takinami, S.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983,
24, 731. (b) Hara, S.; Satoh, Y.; Ishiguro, H.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 735.
(7) Although this sequence begins and ends with a triethylsilyl protecting group
on the primary hydroxyl, an intermediate pivaloyl group was necessary
because the acidic conditions of the bromoboration reaction were not
compatible with the silyl ether.
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Tidwell, T. T. Synthesis 1990, 857. (b) Tidwell, T.
T. Org. React. 1990, 39, 297-572.
(9) (a) Guo, J.; Duffy, K. J.; Stevens, K. L.; Dalko, P. I.; Roth, R. M.; Hayward,
M. M.; Kishi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 187-192. (b) Hayward,
M. M.; Roth, R. M.; Duffy, K. J.; Dalko, P. I.; Stevens, K. L.; Guo, J.;
Kishi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 192-196.
(10) Katritzky, A. R.; Chang, H. X.; Yang, B. Synthesis 1995, 503.
(11) (a) Tsuji, J.; Yamakawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 7, 613. (b) Tsuji, J.;
Shimizu, I.; Minami, I. Chem. Lett. 1984, 1017.
(12) Ott, G. R.; Heathcock, C. H. unpublished results. These model studies were
carried out on the substrate reported in: Ott, G. R.; Heathcock, C. H. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 1475.
9
12846 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 42, 2003