8048
H. Fukumoto et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 8047–8049
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) Boc2O, CH2Cl2; (ii) NaH, CH2ꢀCHCH2Br, THF, reflux; (iii) EtO2CCꢁCCO2Et, CF3CO2H,
reflux; (iv) LiAlH4, THF; (v) t-BuPh2SiCl, Et3N–DMAP (cat.), CH2Cl2; (vi) (COCl)2, DMSO, CH2Cl2 at −78°C then Et3N, 0°C;
(vii) (MeO)2P(O)C(N2)COMe, K2CO3, MeOH; (viii) (n-Bu)4NF, THF; (ix) (COCl)2, DMSO, CH2Cl2, at −78°C then Et3N, 0°C;
(x) CH2ꢀCHMgBr, THF; (xi) Ac2O, Et3N–DMAP (cat.), CH2Cl2; (xii) Et3SiCl, Et3N–DMAP (cat.), CH2Cl2; (xiii) 15 (10 mol%),
CH2Cl2 (0.04 M), reflux; (xiv) K2CO3, MeOH.
with 10 mol% of 15 in CH2Cl2 (0.04 M) at reflux, the
reaction completed after 8 h and tetracyclic compounds
17 and 18 were obtained in a ratio of 63:37 in 78% yield.
In this particular case, the reaction turned out to be very
sluggish at room temperature, possibly because of the
coordination of the free tertiary amine to the ruthenium
catalyst.12,13 After separation of 17 and 18, H–H COSY
and NOE experiments allowed us to determine their
stereostructures unambiguously. Similarly, reaction of 14
with 15 gave 19 and 20 in a ratio of 27:73 in 63% yield.
We were pleased to find that the tetetracyclic compounds
corresponding to 5 were not produced at all in these
reactions. It is therefore apparent that the RCM reac-
tions of 13 and 14 initially occurred between the N-allyl
group and the acetylene (Scheme 2).
References
1. For a review of the erythrina alkaloids, see: Tsuda, Y.;
Sano, T. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1996,; Vol. 48, pp 249–337.
2. For the synthetic methodologies developed recently, see:
(a) Padwa, A.; Hennig, R.; Kappe, C. O.; Reger, T. S. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1144–1155; (b) Toda, J.; Niimura,
Y.; Takeda, K.; Sano, T.; Tsuda, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1998, 46, 906; (c) Rigby, J. H.; Deur, C.; Heeg, M. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6887–6890; (d) Kawasaki, T.;
Onoda, N.; Watanabe, H.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 8003–8006; (e) Chikaoka, S.; Toyao, A.;
Ogasawara, M.; Tamaru, O.; Ishibashi, H. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 312–318.
3. Kim, S.-H.; Zuercher, W. J.; Bowden, N. B.; Grubbs, R.
H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1073–1081.
4. For a related dieneyne RCM, see: Huang, J.; Xiong, H.;
Hsung, R. P.; Rameshkumar, C.; Mulder, J. A.; Grebe,
T. P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2417–2420.
Interestingly, in each reaction, the two epimeric products
were not equally produced even though a 1:1 epimeric
mixture was used as the starting material. In addition,
in the reaction of 13, a-isomer 17 was preferentially
formed, while b-isomer 20 was favored in the reaction of
14. These results may have arisen from the difference
between the epimers in the rate of cyclization or the rate
of decomposition. The steric and electronic nature of the
C3-substituent is thought to affect these rates. Finally,
treatment of 17 with K2CO3 in methanol furnished
( )-erythravine. The synthetic substance exhibited spec-
tral properties14 in accord with those reported15 for
natural erythravine. ( )-3-Epierythravine was also syn-
thesized by methanolysis of 18, quantitatively.
5. Shimizu, K.; Takimoto, M.; Mori, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
2323–2325.
6. Conversion of natural erythotrine 1 (R1=R2=R3=Me)
to erythravine was reported: Sarragiotto, M. H.; da
Costa, P. A.; Marsaioli, A. J. Heterocycles 1984, 22,
453–456.
7. This work was presented at the 32nd Congress of Hetero-
cyclic Chemistry, Tokushima, Japan, December 4–6,
2002.
8. Varcauteren, J.; Lavaut, C.; Levy, J.; Massiot, G. J. Org.
Chem. 1984, 49, 2278–2279.
9. Mu¨ller, S.; Liepold, B.; Roth, G. J.; Bestmann, H. J.
Synlett 1996, 521–522.
10. (a) Schwab, P.; France, M. B.; Ziller, J. W.; Grubbs, R.
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2039–2041; (b)
In conclusion, we have achieved a concise thirteen-step
synthesis of ( )-erythravine from 3,4-dimethoxyphene-
thylamine based on tandem RCM reaction of a dienyne
for the first time. The synthetic method used is of general
value in approaches to related erythrina alkaloids.