Liu et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology
(2019) 19:78
Page 8 of 9
glass. The cover glass was then inverted over a depres- Additional file
sion slide. Vaseline was used to ring the edges of the
pseudosessile with D. purpureum. A–C Aggregations. D Pseudoplasmodia.
F Sorocarps. Scale bars: A,B,D: 1 mm, C: 500 μm, E: 2 mm. Fig. S2. Blast of
SSU sequences of Dictyostelium purpureum var. pseudosessile with D.
purpureum which have 97% identity. Fig. S3. Life cycle of Dictyostelium
purpureum. The time of each stage showed on the top right corner. A–D
Aggregations. E,F Pseudoplasmodia. G–L Sorocarps. Scale bars: A–H: 2
mm, I–L: 1 mm. (DOCX 344 kb)
cover glass. Spores were freely suspended in the water
droplet. Characteristics of the myxamoebae were ob-
served and photographed with a Zeiss light microscope
(Axio Imager A2), using the 10× ocular and 10, 40, and
100× (oil) objectives.
Nomenclature
Acknowledgements
According to the International Code of Nomenclature
used for algae, fungi, and plants, the electronic version
of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will
represent a published work. In addition, new names con-
tained in this study have been submitted to MycoBank
and each will be allocated a unique MycoBank number
which will be accessible through MycoBank, Index Fun-
gorum, GBIF and other international biodiversity initia-
tives, where they will be made available to the Global
Names Index.
We wish to express our appreciation to the editor and the reviewers for their
comments and valuable reviews of this manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (No. 31870015, 31300016), the Science and Technology Development
Program of Jilin Province (No. 20180101273JC), the Program of Creation and
Utilization of Germplasm of Mushroom Crop of the “111” Project (No.
D17014), and the Science and Technology Research Programs of the
Education Department of Jilin Province in the Thirteenth Five–Year Plan (No.
JJKH20180671KJ).
Availability of data and materials
Sequence data are available in GenBank. The nomenclature of the new
variant in the present study is available in MycoBank.
DNA isolation, PCR amplification and sequencing
Authors’ contributions
After amoebae had cleared E. coli on the water agar
media, the spores of the particular dictyostelid isolate
being studied were collected with a sterile tip, mixed
with the lysed buffer of the MiniBEST Universal Gen-
omic DNA Extraction Kit Ver.5.0 (Takara, Japan) follow-
ing the manufacturer’s protocol. The genomic DNA was
used directly for the 18S PCR amplification using the
primers 18SF-A (AACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG) and
18SR-B (TGATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCAC) [16] along
with D542F (ACAATTGGAGGGCAAGTCTG3) and
D1340R (TCGAGGTCTCGTCCGTTATC) [9]. PCR
YZ, PL and JH carried out the research, PL wrote the manuscript, YL
designed the research, SLS revised the manuscript. All authors read and
approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
products were sent to Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shang- Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
hai, China) for sequencing. Sequences obtained were de-
posited at GenBank database. The isolates and the NCBI
GenBank accession numbers of SSU DNA sequences
used in present study are listed in Table 1.
Author details
1Engineering Research Center of Chinese Ministry of Education for Edible
and Medicinal Fungi, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118,
People’s Republic of China. 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of
Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Phylogenetic analysis
Received: 9 May 2018 Accepted: 4 March 2019
The newly-generated sequences were checked and
then submitted to GenBank. The ITS and SSU se-
quences were aligned and compared separately using
the program MUSCLE v.3.6 [17, 18] and then manu-
ally adjusted in MEGA 7.0 [19]. Maximum likelihood
(ML) analyses were performed using RAxML v7 [20].
In the ML analyses, the best-fit substitution models
were estimated using GTR submission model and a
gamma correction for rate variation among sites
(GTRGAMMA), using the CIPRES server. The statis-
tical support of clades was assessed with 1000
rapid-bootstrap (BS) replications.
References
1. Singh BN. Studies on soil Acrasieae. 1. Distribution of species of
Dictyostelium in soils of Great Britain and the effects of bacteria on their
2. Cavender JC, Raper KB. The Acrasieae in nature. I. Isolation. Am J Bot. 1965.
3. Cavender JC, Raper KB. The Acrasieae in nature. II. Forest soil as a primary
4. Raper KB. Acrasiomycetes. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS,
editors. The Fungi. United States: Academic Press; 1973. p. 9–36.
5. Raper KB. The Dictyostelids. New Jersey: Princeton University Press,
Princeton; 1984. p. 1–453