´
M. L. Lopez-Rodrıguez et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 3177–3180
´
3179
and rather tended to potentiate the hypothermia
Conclusions
induced by 8-OH-DPAT (0.5 mg/kg sc). These in vivo
findings appear again to be consistent with a partial
agonism at 5-HT1ARs.
In summary, in a series of new benzimidazole-arylpi-
perazine derivatives compound IIIc has been identi-
fied as a novel mixed 5-HT1A/5-HT3 ligand with high
affinity for both serotonin receptors, an excellent
selectivity profile over a1-adrenergic and dopamine
D2 receptors, and an ability to counteract the cogni-
tive deficit induced by cholinergic blockade, suggest-
ing a potential interest in the treatment of cognitive
dysfunction.
The functional profile of compound IIIc at 5-HT3Rs
was characterized in the isolated longitudinal muscle–
myenteric plexus preparation from guinea-pig ileum.38
The contraction induced in this preparation by the
selective 5-HT3R agonist 2-Me-5-HT (10ꢀ5 M) was
inhibited by compound IIIc at concentrations 10ꢀ7
–
10ꢀ5 M, a full blockade of the contraction being
observed at the highest concentrations tested. Similar
effects were found with the typical 5-HT3R antagonist,
ondansetron. The IC50s for compound IIIc and ondan-
setron in this preparation were almost identical, 0.19
and 0.24 mM, respectively.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia y
Tecnologıa (BQU2001-1459). The authors are grateful to
U.N.E.D. for a predoctoral grant to I. Tejada and to
CEPA SCHWARZ PHARMA for a predoctoral grant to
I. Marco, who also thanks the Spanish Society of Ther-
apeutic Chemistry for the award of the ‘FAES’ prize.
Behavioural effects of compound IIIc
The anxiolytic-like effect of compound IIIc was eval-
uated by using a modified light–dark exploration test
in mice.39 In this modified procedure, control animals
spend less time in the white compartment on the
second day of exposure. This behaviour is effectively
prevented by administration of typical anxiolytic
drugs. At variance with the results obtained with
diazepam (1 mg/kg ip), which approximately doubled
the time spent in the white compartment, no sig-
nificant change was found after administration of
compound IIIc at doses of 0.1 and 1 mg/kg sc, given
30 min before the test, indicating no anxiolytic-like
effect for this compound in this test, at least at the
doses used.
References and Notes
1. Baumgarten, H. G.; Gothert, M. Serotoninergic Neurons
and 5-HT Receptors in the CNS; Handb. Exp. Pharm. Vol.
129; Springer: Berlin, 1997.
2. Advances in Serotonin Receptor Research: Molecular Biology,
Signal Transmission, and Therapeutics; Martin, G. R.; Eglen,
R. M.; Hoyer, D.; Hamblin, M. W.; Yocca, F., Eds. Ann.
N.Y. Acad. Sci.: New York, 1998.
3. Barnes, N. M.; Sharp, T. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38,
1083.
4. Hoyer, D.; Hannon, J. P.; Martin, G. R. Pharmacol. Bio-
chem. Behav. 2002, 71, 533.
The effect of compound IIIc on learning and reten-
tion was evaluated by using a passive avoidance
procedure.40 As shown in Figure 2, the muscarinic
receptor antagonist scopolamine, administered 30 min
before the acquisition session, reduced significantly
the retention latency 24 h later. Compound IIIc, at
the dose of 1 mg/kg sc, 30 min before the acquisition
trial, had no effect by itself in this test, but sig-
nificantly prevented the retention impairment induced
by cholinergic blockade when given 15 min before
scopolamine.
5. Uphouse, L. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1997, 21, 679.
6. Saxena, P. R.; De Vries, P.; Villalon, C. M. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1998, 19, 311.
7. Bikker, J. A.; Trump-Kallmeyer, S.; Humblet, S. J. Med.
Chem. 1998, 41, 2911.
8. Schwartz, P. J.; Turner, E. H.; Garcıa-Borreguero, D.;
Sedway, J.; Vetticad, R. G.; Wehr, T. A.; Murphy, D. L.;
Rosenthal, N. E. Psychiatry Res. 1999, 86, 9.
9. Sarnyai, Z.; Sibille, E. L.; Pavlides, C.; Fenster, R. J.;
McEwen, B. S.; Toth, M. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97,
14731.
10. Peglion, J. L.; Goument, B.; Despaux, N.; Charlot, V.;
Giraud, H.; Nisole, C.; Newman-Tancredi, A.; Dekeyne, A.;
Bertrand, M.; Genissel, P.; Millan, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 2002,
45, 165.
11. Yasuno, F.; Suhara, T.; Nakayama, T.; Ichimiya, T.;
Okubo, Y.; Takano, A.; Ando, T.; Inoue, M.; Maeda, J.;
Suzuki, K. Am. J. Psychiatry 2003, 160, 334.
12. Veyrat-Follet, C.; Farinotti, R.; Palmer, J. L. Drugs 1997,
53, 206.
13. Watters, J.; Riley, M.; Pedley, I.; Whitehead, A.; Overend,
M.; Goss, I.; Allgar, V. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 13, 422.
14. Greenshaw, A. J.; Silverstone, P. H. Drugs 1997, 53, 20.
15. Bloom, F. E.; Morales, M. Neurochem. Res. 1998, 23, 653.
16. Zhang, Z. J.; Schmidt, D. E.; de-Paulis, T.; Trivedi, B. L.;
Onaivi, E. S.; Ebert, M. H.; Hewlett, W. A. Pharmacol. Bio-
chem. Behav. 2001, 69, 571.
17. Lopez-Rodrıguez, M. L.; Rosado, M. L.; Benhamu, B.;
Morcillo, M. J.; Sanz, A. M.; Orensanz, L.; Beneitez, M. E.;
Fuentes, J. A.; Manzanares, J. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4439.
Figure 2. Prevention by compound IIIc of scopolamine-induced
impairment of passive avoidance learning in rats. Scopolamine and
compound IIIc (1 mg/kg each) given 30 and 45 min, respectively,
before the acquisition trial. Response latency evaluated 24 h later.
Values are meansꢁSEM from 10–20 animals. *p<0.05 versus control;
yp<0.05 versus scopolamine-treated group (ANOVA followed by
Student–Newman Keuls’s test).