537
Avascular PEDs as demonstrated by ICG and fluores- ment of ions and material by the RPE. In vascular lesions
cein angiography were initially smaller. Despite their the new vessel complex would contribute to the accumula-
small size their effect on visual acuity was comparable to tion (Fig. 5). Therefore, it was hypothesized that the hydro-
that of the other two types of PED. They also enlarged phobic barrier in Bruch’s membrane is responsible for the
during follow-up but remained relatively small and finally fluid accumulation under the RPE, but another factor in
regressed. After several months of follow-up there was Bruch’s membrane, the RPE or the retina is responsible for
progressive visual loss, most commonly associated with development of choroidal neovascularization under the
RPE atrophy, although the final vision was somewhat bet- RPE (“dual pathogenetic pathway”). This may result in spe-
ter than in the other two types of PED. The small number cific therapeutic approaches in the different types of PED.
of avascular PEDs that grew to the size of the other forms
all developed evidence of new vessels during the study.
The situation in PCV is less clear. In one histologic
study it has been reported that the vascular complex is inter-
It has been hypothesized that detachment of the RPE is nal to Bruch’s membrane [16]. If this is the case the venous
consequent upon the presence of a hydrophobic barrier to complex would contribute to the fluid. There is a clinical
the outward passage of fluid at the level of Bruch’s mem- impression that in some cases the complex is within the
brane, due to accumulation of neutral lipids. There is strong choroid, and both situations may exist. In the latter case, se-
circumstantial evidence to support this hypothesis [6, 10, rous detachment of the retinal pigment epithelium may not
11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 29], but this pathogenetic concept occur, but the lesion would present with hemorrhage or reti-
has never been shown to correlate with the natural course of nal edema. This difference in anatomic site may account for
different clinical PED entities. The similar clinical behavior the spontaneous resolution of some lesions.
of the different lesions during follow-up implies that this
In conclusion, the natural course of the different clini-
mechanism may be common to all three. The source of flu- cal entities of PED supports the concept that a specific
id may represent the only difference among them, and may significant hydrophobic barrier in Bruch’s membrane is
explain the quantitative differences. In the avascular lesions central to the pathogenesis of the lesion whether or not
the fluid is believed to accumulate from the outward move- there are new vessels of PCV.
References
1. Ahuja RM, Stanga PE, Vingerling JR,
Reck AC, Bird AC (2000) Polypoidal
choroidal vasculopathy in exudative
and haemorrhagic pigment epithelial
detachments. Br J Ophthalmol 84:479–
484
2. Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics
for medical research. Chapman and
Hall, London, p 245
8. Chuang EL, Bird AC (1988) Bilaterali- 16. Lafaut BA, Aisenbrey S, Vanden
ty of tears of the retinal pigment epi-
thelium. Br J Ophthalmol 72:918–920
9. Chuang EL, Bird AC (1988) The
Pathogenesis of tears of the retinal pig-
ment epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol
105:285–290
Broecke C, Krott R, Jonescu-Cuypers
CP, Reynders S, Bartz-Schmidt KU
(2001) Clinicopathological correlation
of retinal pigment epithelial tears in ex-
udative age related macular degenera-
tion: pretear, tear, and scarred tear.
Br J Ophthalmol 85:454–60
10. Curcio CA, Millican CL, Bailey T,
Kruth HS (2001) Accumulation of cho- 17. Moore DJ, Hussain AA, Marshall J
3. Altman DG (1999) Practical statistics
for medical research. Chapman and
Hall, London, p 365
4. Bandello F, Incorvaia C, Parmeggiani
F, Sebastiani A (2000) Idiopathic mul-
tiple serous detachments of the retinal
pigment epithelium followed by bilat-
eral central serous chorioretinopathy:
a case report. Ophthalmologica 214:362–
367
5. Bird AC (1991) Doyne Lecture: Patho-
genesis of retinal pigment epithelial
detachment in the elderly: the rele-
vance of Bruch’s membrane change.
Eye 5:1–12
6. Bird AC (1992) Bruch’s membrane
change with age. Br J Ophthalmol
76:166–168
lesterol with age in human Bruch’s
membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
42:265–274
(1995) Age-related variation in the hy-
draulic conductivity of Bruch’s mem-
brane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
36:1290–1297
11. Fisher RF (1987) The influence of age
on some ocular basement membranes.
Eye 1:184–189
12. Frederick ARJ, Morley MG, Topping
TM, Peterson TJ, Wilson DJ (1993)
The appearance of stippled retinal pig-
ment epithelial detachments. A sign of
occult choroidal neovascularization in
age-related macular degeneration.
Retina 13:3–7
13. Gass JDM (1997) Stereoscopic atlas of
macular diseases. Mosby, St. Louis
14. Holz FG, Sheraidah G, Pauleikhoff D,
Bird AC (1994) Analysis of lipid de-
posits extracted from human macular
and peripheral Bruch’s membrane.
Arch Ophthalmol 112:402–406
15. Kunze C, Elsner AE, Beausencourt E,
Moraes L, Hartnett ME, Trempe CL
(1999) Spatial extent of pigment epi-
thelial detachments in age-related mac-
ular degeneration. Ophthalmology
106:1830–1840
18. Okubo A, Rosa RH, Bunce CV,
Alexander RA, Fan JT, Bird AC,
Luthert PJ (1999) The relationships of
age changes in retinal pigment epitheli-
um and Bruch’s membrane. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:443–449
19. Pauleikhoff D, Harper CA, Marshall J,
Bird AC (1990) Aging changes in
Bruch’s membrane. A histochemical
and morphologic study. Ophthalmology
97:171–178
20. Pauleikhoff D, Knebel C, Peuser M,
Schrenk M, Wessing A (1996) Fluores-
zenzangiographie der AMD. Studie zur
Häufigkeit koagulativ behandelbarer
Läsionen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd
209:309–314
7. Bird AC, Marshall J (1986) Retinal
pigment epithelial detachments in the
elderly. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK
105:674–682