660
P. Vianello et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 657–661
Scheme 4. (a) p-Methoxybenzylalcohol, DIC, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, overnight, 82%; (b) 4-aminothiophenol, DBU, DMF, rt, 8 h, 50%; (c) DIC,
DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h, 51%; (d) TFA, CH2Cl2, 3 h, rt, 90%.
Table 2.
showed low nanomolar activity but only 13c displayed
good selectivity with respect to aIIbb3, with an aIIbb3/
Biochemical assays (IC50
avb3: 0.016ꢁ0.009 mM
aIIbb3: 9.8ꢁ4.6 mM
)
avb3 IC50 ratio of ca. 600. In cell adhesion assays,20
compound 13c confirmed as a specific inhibitor of the
avb3-mediated adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins
(Table 2). The compound did not show activity in
adhesion assays dependent on aIIbb3, a5b1 and a4b1
integrin, and did not inhibit in vitro growth of CEMD9
cells21 at 72 h after continuous treatment.
Cytotoxicity (ED50
)
CEMD9: >100 mM
Cell Adhesion (EC50
)
CEMD9-Vitronectin: 0.706ꢁ0.37 mM
CHOaIIbb3-Fibrinogen: >100 mM
K562-Fibronectin (a5b1): >100 mM
CEMD9-VCAM1 (a4b1): >100 mM
In conclusion, a nanomolar avb3 inhibitor with a good
selectivity versus the aIIbb3 integrin in both the bio-
chemical and cell-based assays, and devoid of cytotoxi-
city, has been obtained. This compound represented the
starting point for further expansion of this class.
di-Boc-N00-triflyl-guanidine.17 In the deprotection of the
amino group, a low concentration of piperidine and a
short reaction time were mandatory to avoid the retro-
Michael reaction.18 Subsequent cleavage with tri-
fluoroacetic acid in dichloromethane gave the desired
compounds with 80–90% purity.
References and notes
1. Hynes, R. O. Cell 1992, 69, 11.
The most interesting compound 13c was re-prepared in
homogeneous phase as reported in Scheme 4. trans-3-(3-
Pyridyl)acrylic acid was protected as p-methoxybenzyl
ester (20), treated with 4-aminothiophenol to give 21,
which in turn was reacted with compound 22, obtained
by reaction of m-amino benzoic acid with N,N0-di-Boc-
N00-triflyl-guanidine in presence of triethylamine, to
yield 23. Subsequent treatment with trifluoroacetic acid
in dichloromethane led to 13c.
2. Giancotti, F. G.; Ruoslahti, E. Science 1999, 285, 1028.
3. Brooks, P. C.; Clark, R. A.; Cheresh, D. A. Science 1994,
264, 569.
4. Brooks, P. C.; Montgomery, A. M. P.; Rosenfeld, M.;
Reisfeld, R. A.; Hu, T.; Klier, G.; Cheresh, D. A. Cell
1994, 79, 1157.
5. Brooks, P. C.; Stromblad, S.; Klemke, R.; Visscher, D.;
Sarkar, F. H.; Cheresh, D. A. J. Clin. Invest. 1995, 96, 1815.
6. Max, R.; Gerritsen, R. R.; Nooijen, P. T.; Goodman,
S. L.; Sutter, A.; Keilholz, U.; Ruiter, D. J.; De Waal,
R. M. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 71, 320.
7. Gasparini, G.; Brooks, P. C.; Biganzoli, E.; Vermeulen,
P. B.; Bonoldi, E.; Dirix, L. Y.; Ranieri, G.; Miceli, R.;
Cheresh, D. A. Clin. Cancer Res. 1998, 4, 2625.
8. Vonlaufen, A.; Wiedle, G.; Borisch, B.; Birrer, S.; Luder,
P.; Imhof, B. A. Mod. Pathol. 2001, 14, 1126.
9. Natali, P. G.; Hamby, C. V.; Felding-Habermann, B.;
Liang, B.; Nicotra, M. R.; Di Filippo, F.; Giannarelli, D.;
Temponi, M.; Ferrone, S. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 1554.
10. Pignatelli, M.; Cardillo, M. R.; Hanby, A.; Stamp, G. W.
Hum. Pathol. 1992, 23, 1159.
11. Liapis, H.; Adler, L. M.; Wick, M. R.; Rader, J. S. Hum.
Pathol. 1997, 28, 443.
12. Pilch, J.; Habermann, R.; Felding-Habermann, B. J. Biol.
Chem. 2002, 277, 21930.
13. Rolli, M.; Fransvea, E.; Pilch, J.; Saven, A.; Felding-
Habermann, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100,
9482.
14. Hsu, M. Y.; Shih, D. T.; Meier, F. E.; Van Belle, P.; Hsu,
J. Y.; Elder, D. E.; Buck, C. A.; Herlyn, M. Am. J. Pathol.
1998, 153, 1435.
3. Conclusions
An efficient method for the preparation of 3-phenylthio-
3-nicotinyl propionic acids on solid phase has been
developed. A preliminary exploration of this class of
compounds as avb3 antagonists has been carried out
preparing 39 derivatives (Table 1).
Binding studies19 demonstrated that compounds bear-
ing a guanidino residue have good affinity for the avb3
receptor, and para- and meta-aminothiophenol deriv-
atives showed submicromolar IC50s. Among those
compounds, replacement of the aliphatic chain with a
phenyl ring led to more potent derivatives. In the latter
series of compounds the position of the guanidino
group affects both the binding to avb3 and the selectiv-
ity with respect to the closely related aIIbb3 integrin. As
reported in Table 1, compounds 13b, 13c and 14b all