ISSN 0012-5008, Doklady Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 422, Part 2, pp. 260–264. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2008.
Original Russian Text © I.G. Tananaev, A.A. Letyushov, A.M. Safiulina, I.B. Goryunova, T.V. Baulina, V.P. Morgalyuk, E.I. Goryunov, L.A. Gribov, E.E. Nifant’ev,
B.F. Myasoedov, 2008, published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2008, Vol. 422, No. 6, pp. 762–766.
CHEMISTRY
Search Strategy for New Efficient Organophosphorus
Extractants for Concentrating Radionuclides
Corresponding Member of the RAS I. G. Tananaeva, A. A. Letyushova, A. M. Safiulinab,
I. B. Goryunovac, T. V. Baulinac, V. P. Morgalyukc, E. I. Goryunovc,
Corresponding Member of the RAS L. A. Gribovb, Corresponding Member of the RAS E. E. Nifant’evc,
and Academician B. F. Myasoedovb
Received June 30, 2008
DOI: 10.1134/S0012500808100054
Long-term systematic studies of actinide and lan- tive extraction constant) of uranyl nitrate and nitric
thanide extraction from acid solutions have implied that acid, on the one hand, and the sums of the electronega-
tivities of substituents at the phosphorus atom in this
series of compounds, on the other. From calculations,
the extraction ability of MNOPCs decreases with
increasing substituent electronegativity.
bidentate neutral organophosphorus compounds
(BNOPCs) are the most efficient extractants for these
metals [1]. Naturally, new, even more efficient extract-
ants are expected to exist among these compounds. In
our opinion, the most promising strategy for choosing
such extractants is a systematic theoretical search for
BNOPCs with high complexing abilities to 4f and 5f
elements followed by experimental verification of the-
oretical inferences.
Although electronegativities can be determined
autonomously, the above correlation unfortunately
cannot be applied to BNOPCs, which are of the most
practical importance [1]. In this context, another
approach to the problem was proposed on the basis
of quantum-chemical calculations of molecular elec-
trostatic fields (MESFs); we have successfully used
this approach [6]. Not only did this strategy reveal
the calculation parameters that can explain distinc-
tions in reactivities of organophosphorus com-
pounds, but it also helped us to create a complex
quantum-chemical approach to predicting the extrac-
tion ability of these compounds, including transu-
ranic elements.
One major task of this search is to determine the
relationship between the extraction ability and structure
of organophosphorus compounds. Correlations of
extraction constants with some features of structure
families were used for this purpose, for example, corre-
lations with the electronegativity [2], Taft constant σ∗
[3], and Kabachnik constant σp [4] (on the assumption
that the substituent effect is additive). In particular, it
was found for various types of monodentate neutral
organophosphorus compounds (MNOPCs)—phos-
phates, phosphonates, phosphinates, and phosphine
oxides—that the reactive site (P=O group) and the com-
position of the complex (the ratio element : ligand)
remain unchanged, while the extraction ability consid-
erably increases in this series. Rozen et al. [5] proposed
a correlation between lnKex values (where Kex is effec-
Here, we use MESF quantum-chemical calculations
to choose N-diphenylphosphoryl-N'-alkylureas as the
most effective BNOPCs for concentrating and separat-
ing 4f and 5f elements; we also compare theoretical pre-
dictions with experiments.
Concept of the strategy. Complexing between an
organic reagent and a metal ion (with the desolvation of
the reacting species being ignored) can be divided into
two stages. First, the metal cation and the ligand group
(LG) of the reagent come closer to each other. Second,
they directly react at distances close to chemical bond
lengths; this reaction involves electron exchange and
the generation of the relevant complex. It is believed
that the removed substituents only insignificantly alter
the electronic state of the atoms in the LG of the
reagent, which should not considerably affect its reac-
tivity to the given metal atom.
a Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry
and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Leninskii pr. 31, Moscow, 119991 Russia
b Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical
Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Kosygina 19,
Moscow, 119991 Russia
c Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds,
Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Vavilova 28,
Moscow, 119991 Russia
260