Angewandte
Chemie
(S,S)-(D)-4 is slightly more stable than l-(S,S)-(D)-4 (1.5:1).
There appears to be some stereoselective interaction between
the guanidyl and salicyl groups in the imino acid salt (4). It is
interesting that the kinetic stereoselectivity (5:1) is consid-
erably greater than the thermodynamic stereoselectivity
(1.5:1). Table 1 shows that even at 4 h as at 72 h, the
diastereomeric ratio of the imino acid salt (7.5:1) is greater
than that of the amino acid salt (5:1) by a factor of 1.5.
The results are quite different if we carry out the above
experiment with l-alanine in H2O (Supporting Information,
Figure S27) instead of D2O. Unlike in D2O, there is no
enantiomeric excess of d-alanine in H2O at any point in time.
Immediately after separating the two layers, the CD3Cl layer
shows that the amino acid salt ratio (d-(S,S)-(H)-3/l-(S,S)-
(H)-3) is about 0.87:1 (Supporting Information, Figure S27
top). After 3 h of separation of the chloroform layer, the
amino acid salt ratio is about 1:1 while the imino acid salt ratio
is about 1.5:1 favoring the d form (Supporting Information,
Figure S27 bottom). In comparing the experiments in D2O
and H2O, the results are very different initially (Supporting
Information, Figure S26 vs S27 top) but similar at 3 h
(Supporting Information, Figure S26 vs S27 bottom). Initially,
there is equilibrium overshoot (net l to d conversion) in the
D2O experiment but not in the H2O experiemnt. At 3 h, both
the H2O and the D2O experiments reach the same thermody-
namic equilibrium (same d/l ratios of the imino acid salts
(1.5:1) and the amino acid salts (1:1)).
It is interesting that we observe catalytic l to d conversion
of alanine in D2O (Figure 1; Supporting Information, Fig-
ure S26). This could not take place in H2O (Supporting
Information, Figure S27 top) since it would violate the
principle of microscopic reversibility to have net directional
catalysis (that is, more efficient l to d than d to l).
Furthermore, it would go against the second law of thermo-
dynamics to go beyond racemization to enantiomeric excess
of d-alanine in H2O with a catalyst since that would represent
decreasing entropy without change in enthalpy. In our case,
significant kinetic isotope effect allows catalytic l to d
conversion of alanine to take place in D2O.
The deuteration of l-alanine takes place more rapidly if
1 is used with (R,R)-2 instead of (S,S)-2. The half-life for
deuteration of l-alanine when (R,R)-2 is used with 1 is about
15 min in contrast to about 75 min when (S,S)-2 is used with
1 under our experimental conditions. However we do not
observe net l to d conversion of alanine if we use (R,R)-2
instead of (S,S)-2. We observe deuteration of l-alanine with
retention of configuration when (R,R)-2 is used with 1.
Similarly, we observe deuteration of d-alanine with retention
of configuration when (S,S)-2 is used with 1. This can be
explained by using an energy diagram (Scheme 3) for
catalytic deuteration of l-alanine (l-alaH, Scheme 3) to give
deuterated d-alanine (d-alaD) and deuterated l-alanine (l-
alaD). The starting material and products in Scheme 3 may be
regarded to be in the chloroform layer or the D2O layer.
The energy diagram is consistent with all our experimen-
tal results but is not drawn to scale. The intermediate ((S,S)-5,
Scheme 2) deuterates stereoselectively to give d-alaD over l-
alaD as depicted by the energy difference h in Scheme 3. The
selectivity can be seen experimentally as amino acid salt ratios
Scheme 3. Energy diagram for deuteration of l-alaH.
in CDCl3 (Supporting Information, Figure S26 top right). The
two products equilibrate slowly due to kinetic isotope effect
and eventually reach equilibrium ratio of 1:1 as depicted by
equal energies of the two products (Scheme 3). This can also
be seen experimentally to be about 1:1 amino acid salt ratio in
1
CDCl3 as determined by integration of the H NMR peaks
(Supporting Information, Figure S26 bottom right). Note that
the imino acid salt ratio is not 1:1 at equilibrium (Supporting
Information, Figure S26 bottom left) as there is some
stereoselectivity for formation of the diastereomeric imino
acid salts. Conversion of the starting material to products is
downhill since there is much more D2O than H2O in the
experiment. d-alaD should dedeuterate more rapidly than l-
alaD (f > g) as shown in Scheme 3. It follows that d-alaH
should deprotonate more rapidly than l-alaH. In agreement,
we observe that (S,S)-2 is more reactive for deprotonating d-
alanine than l-alanine. Indeed, the relative rate of deproto-
nation of d-alaH and l-alaH with (S,S)-2 should be essentially
equal to the relative rate of deuteration of (S,S)-5 to give d-
alaD and l-alaD (given by h in Scheme 3). When the experi-
ment is carried out with H2O instead of D2O (Supporting
Information, Figure S27), there cannot be enantiomeric
excess of the product (d-alaH) since it would be equal in
energy as the starting material (l-alaH) unlike in Scheme 3.
If (R,R)-2 is used instead of (S,S)-2 as catalyst, intermedi-
ate (R,R)-5 would form and preferentially give l-alaD over d-
alaD in symmetry with Scheme 3, and therefore not result in
net l to d conversion of alanine. Thus, deuteration of l-
alanine with (R,R)-2 and 1 should take place with retention of
configuration in agreement with the experiment.
The only previous examples for obtaining catalytic
stereoselective deuteration of amino acids is with enzymes.
Alanine[8] and proline[9] racemases have been shown to
deuterate amino acids streoselectivity. It is remarkable that
our simple system provides greater stereoselectivity (67% ee)
than the enzymic systems (< 20% ee) for deuteration of
alanine or proline. In the enzymic studies, CD spectroscopy
was used to determine the enantiomeric excess of d-amino
acids. While detailed NMR studies are readily accessible with
both enantiomers of the catalyst in our system ((S,S)-2 and
(R,R)-2), it would be technically difficult to do similar studies
with enzymes. Highly efficient chemoenzymatic catalytic l to
d conversion of amino acids under non-equilibrium condi-
tions using oxidation and reducing agents have been
reported.[10]
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9381 –9385
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
9383