A. Selmi, R. Aydi, O. Kammoun et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1235 (2021) 130230
The organic layer was extracted with dichloromethane, washed
with a saturated aqueous NaCl solution, dried over sodium sul-
fate, and filtered. Then, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the
obtained crude was purified by chromatography (silica gel, eluent
dichloromethane/methanol 98:2). The purity of the products was
checked by TLC.
3.2. X-ray crystallography
Suitable crystals were mounted on D8 VENTURE Bruker AXS
diffractometer. The structure was solved by direct methods using
the SIR97 program [44], and then refined with full-matrix least-
square methods based on F2 (SHELXL-97) [45]. All non-hydrogen
atoms were refined with anisotropic atomic displacement param-
eters. H atoms were finally included in their calculated positions.
A final refinement on F2 with 3216 unique intensities and 174 pa-
rameters converged at ωR(F2) = 0.0828 (R(F) = 0.0329) for 2811
observed reflections with I > 2σ(I).
Preparation
of
imine
2a:
3,3-Dimethyl-1-phenyl-3,4-
dihydroisoquinoline. The general procedure was followed using
429 mg (4.162 mmol) of benzonitrile to yield 2a as a white solid
(83%). mp: 69–71 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 1.34 (s,
6H, 2CH3), 2.86 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.23–7.61 (m, 9H, H-Ar). ¹³C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 27.64, 38.84, 54.49, 126.43, 127.92,
128.00, 128.14, 128.22, 128.78, 128.95, 130.65, 137.54, 139.30,
164.53. HRMS (ESI) [M + H]+ calc. For C17 H18 N 236.1433; found
236.1424.
3.3.Hirshfeld. surface analysis
Hirshfeld surface analysis [46,47] is performed with CrystalEx-
plorer (Version 3.1) [48] to further understand the relative contri-
butions of intermolecular interactions by various molecular con-
tacts in the organic imine.
Preparation
of
imine
2b:1-(4-Chlorophenyl)−3,3-dimethyl-3,4-
dihydroisoquinoline. The general procedure was followed using
572 mg (4.16 mmol) of 4-chlorobenzonitrile to yield 2b as a white
solid (72%): mp 112–115 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm:
1.27 (s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.80 (2H, CH2), 7.16 (m, 1H-Ar), 7.21 (m, 2H-Ar),
7.39 (m, 3H-Ar), 7.51 (m, 2H-Ar). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
ppm: 27.56 (2CH3), 38.84 (CH2), 54.69 (C-2CH3), 126.58, 127.67,
128.40, 130.26, 130.95, 135.10, 137.61, 137.68, 163.61. HRMS (ESI)
[M + H]+ calc. For C17 H17 ClN 270.1044; found 270.1034.
3.4. Biology
3.4.1. Determination of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)
inhibition activity
The ACE inhibitory activity was assayed as reported by Naka-
mura et al. [49]. A volume of 80 μL containing different concentra-
tions (0.2, 0.4, 0.6 or 0.8 mg mL−1) of test compounds was added
to 200 μL of 5 mM hippuryl-l-histidyl-lleucine (HHL) and preincu-
bated for 3 min at 37 °C The test compounds and HHL were pre-
pared in 100 mM borate buffer (pH 8.3), containing 300 mM NaCl.
The reactions were then initiated by adding 20 μL of 0.1 U mL-1
ACE from rabbit lung prepared in the same buffer. After incuba-
tion for 30 min at 37 °C, the enzyme reactions were stopped by
the addition of 250 μL of 0.05 M HCl. The liberated hippuric acid
(HA) was extracted with ethyl acetate (1.7 mL) and then evapo-
rated at 90 °C for 10 min. The residue was dissolved in 1 ml of
distilled water and the absorbance of the extract at 228 nm was
determined using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV mini 1240,
UV/VIS spectrophotometer, SHIMDZU, China).
3.1.2. General synthetic procedure of imines 2 (c-d):
The cold imine 2(c-d) 600 mg was added dropwise to 6 mL
of sulfuric acid (95%). A solution of potassium nitrate (2,3 eq) in
2 mL sulfuric acid was added dropwise whith mainting the tem-
perature at 0 °C. The reaction medium was stirred at room tem-
perature for 2 h, then at 60 °C for 4 h. After return to room
temperature, the reaction medium was poured on ice-cold wa-
ter, and alkalized with ammonia. The organic phase was extracted
with dichloromethane, washed with a saturated aqueous solution
of chloride sodium, dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and evapo-
rated. The residue was purified by chromatography (silicgel, eluent
dichloromethane/ methanol 98:2). The purity of the products was
checked by TLC.
The average value from three determinations at each concentra-
tion was used to calculate the ACE inhibition rate as follows:
ꢀ
ꢁ
B − A
B − C
Preparation of imine 2c: 3, 3-Dimethyl-7-nitro-1-(3-nitrophenyl)−3,
4-dihydro isoquinoline. The general procedure was followed us-
ing 600 mg (2,52 mmol) of 2a to yield 2c as a yellow solid
(65%). Mp: 172–174 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 1.31
ACE inhibition % =
x100
where A is the absorbance of HA generated in the presence of
ACE inhibitor, B is the absorbance of HA generated without ACE
inhibitors (100 mM borate buffer pH 8.3 was used instead of com-
pounds 2(a-d) and C is the absorbance of HA generated without
ACE (corresponding to HHL autolysis in the course of enzymatic
assay). The IC50 value, defined as the concentration of compounds
2(a-d) required to inhibit 50% of ACE activity, was calculated for
each sample using non-linear regression from a plot of percentage
ACE inhibition versus sample concentrations.
3
(s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.94 (2H, CH2), 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H-Ar), 7.67
3
3
3
(t,
4
J = 8.1 Hz,
J = 7.5 Hz, 1H-Ar), 7.90 (ddd,
J = 7.5 Hz,
2.1 Hz,
2.1 Hz, 1H-Ar), 8.38
4
4
J
=
1.8 Hz,
J
=
1.2 Hz, 1H-Ar), 7.99 (d,
J
=
3
4
1H-Ar), 8.30 (dd,
3
J
=
8.1 Hz,
J
=
4
4
(ddd,
J = 8.1 Hz,
J = 2.1 Hz,
J = 1.2 Hz, 1H-Ar). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 27.38 (2CH3), 38.68 (CH2), 55.45
(C-2CH3), 121.73, 123.79, 124.59, 126.03, 127.71, 129.75, 134.39,
145.07, 146.94, 148.49, 160.75. HRMS (ESI) [M + H]+ calc. For
C17H16N3O4 326.1135; found 326.1121.
3.4.2. Molecular docking of the chemical compounds in the ACE
binding site
Preparation of imine 2d:1-(4–chloro-3-nitrophenyl)−3, 3-dimethyl-7-
nitro-3, 4 dihydroisoquinoline. The general procedure was followed
using 600 mg (2,22 mmol) of 2b to yield 2d as a white solid
(93%). Mp: 194–196 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 1.31
Docking material. Docking preparation and energy (kcal/mol) cal-
culations of compounds and Angiotensin-I converting enzyme
(ACE) were performed by MGL tool and AutoDock Vina software
with its scoring function [50-51]. MGL tool is used to generate
PDBQT files which are input files to run docking by Vina. In a
comparative assessment of scoring functions (CASF) carried out in
2018, popular and free software docking programs AutoDock and
Vina were generally in the first half and first quarter, respectively,
among all methods tested in CASF-2013. Vina was the best of all
methods in terms of docking power [52]. AutoDoc Vina uses a hy-
brid scoring function that is inspired by X-score [53], which ac-
counts for van der waals forces, hydrogen bonding, deformation
3
(s, 6H, 2CH3), 2.94 (2H, CH2), 7.49 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H-Ar), 7.69
3
3
4
(d,
J = 8.3 Hz, 1H-Ar), 7.74 (dd,
J = 8.3 Hz,
J = 2.2 Hz,
J = 2.2 Hz,
4
4
1H-Ar), 8.04 (d,
1H-Ar), 8.32 (dd,
J = 2.2 Hz, 1H-Ar), 8.19 (d,
4
3
J = 8.3 Hz,
J = 2.2 Hz, 1H-Ar). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm: 27.30 (2CH3), 38.69 (CH2), 55.59 (C-
2CH3), 121.54, 125.96, 126.15, 127.36, 128.50, 129.88, 132.11, 132.83,
137.78, 145.11, 147.01, 148.19, 159.77. HRMS (ESI) [M + H]+ calc. For
C17 H15ClN3O4 360.0745; found 360.0734.
7