Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
total, the diastereoselectivity of the transformation is invariant
to any combination of the E/Z geometry of both olefins of the
in situ generated silyl enol ether. We term this effect global
diastereoconvergencei.e. all possible stereoisomers derived
from permutations of stereochemical elements of the reagent
lead to the formation of a single stereoisomer of the product.
To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first example
of a globally diastereoconvergent Ireland−Claisen rearrange-
ment of an acyclic, tetrasubstituted silyl enol ether.
A powerful feature of the Ireland−Claisen rearrangement is
its ability to relay stereochemical information from a chiral
center in the substrate to the absolute stereochemistry of the
rearranged product.18 In contrast to previous achiral examples,
the approach of a chiral cinnamyl fragment from either the Re
or Si face of the enol ether gives rise to diastereomeric
transition states. For a mixture of E/Z silyl enol ethers this
gives rise to eight unique transition states, which we modeled
with regard to enantioenriched α-phthalimido ester 21 (Figure
6).
Analogous to our previous discussion, the Z- and E-silyl enol
ethers derived from 21 preferentially rearrange via chair-like
(TS21) and boat-like (TS28) transition states, respectively.
While the NPhth−Ph(cinnamyl) eclipsing interaction drives
the chair/boat selectivity in each silyl enol ether geometry,
differentiation between the two diastereotopic chair-like (TS21
and TS23) and boat-like (TS26 and TS28) transition states
must be achieved for effective chirality transfer. This
component of the stereoselectivity arises in the energetic
differences between axial and equatorial orientations of the
methyl group (Figure 6). For the relevant chair-like transition
states (TS21 and TS23) derived from the Z-enol ether of 21,
the 1,3-diaxial interactions imposed from the methyl group
occupying an axial orientation carry an energetic penalty of 4.3
kcal/mol. Likewise, for the pair of boat-like transition states in
the rearrangement of the E-enol ether (TS26 and TS28) a
preference of 1.4 kcal/mol is found for the equatorial
orientation of the methyl group. As a result, the system
exhibits diastereoconvergence with respect to chirality transfer.
To experimentally demonstrate this, we synthesized the
enantioenriched α-phthalimido ester from the requisite
alcohol, in turn prepared via a Corey−Bakshi−Shibata
(CBS) reduction. Indeed, nonselective enolization, trapping
as the TMS enol ether, and warming to 20 °C afforded the
desired α,α-disubstituted acid. The crude acid was sub-
sequently transformed to methyl ester 22, which was isolated
in 86% yield over two steps, with >20:1 dr and with complete
retention of the enantiomeric excess (95% ee) (Figure 6).
Substrate Scope of the Diastereoconvergent Ire-
land−Claisen Rearrangement. A variety of differentially
substituted α-aryl, α-phthalimido esters were examined in the
Ireland−Claisen rearrangement to explore the scope of this
transformation (Table 3). The reaction was highly compatible
with a broad scope of differentially substituted esters, affording
tetrasubstituted amino acid derivatives bearing an adjacent
tertiary stereogenic center with generally >20:1 diastereose-
lectivity. Additionally, the rearrangement could be performed
with the standard substrate 14 on a 5.00 g (12.6 mmol) scale
with identical yield and diastereoselectivity. In some cases, the
carboxylic acid products were transformed into the corre-
sponding methyl ester to circumvent challenges in substrate
acid/base purification or decomposition of the parent
carboxylic acid. With respect to the α-aryl group, a variety of
both electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl rings were
Figure 6. Chirality transfer in the diastereoconvergent Ireland−
Claisen rearrangement. Relative free energies (in kcal/mol) of the
eight possible stereochemically distinct transition states for the
rearrangement of the E- and Z-silyl enol ethers derived from 21.
To further highlight the role that the phthalimide moiety has
in the stereocontrol of the rearrangement, control calculations
were carried out in which the α-phthalimide of (E/Z)-8 is
for details). An analysis analogous to that of TS11−TS14
revealed that the magnitude of ΔΔG⧧ of the chair/boat
selectivity is reduced for both enolate geometries. Critically,
with the α-phthalimide replaced with an α-ethyl substituent,
the key diastereoconvergence of the transformation is lost, as
the chair-like transition state is favored for both E- and Z-silyl
enol ethers by 1.5 and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively.17 Hence, in
addition to being individually less selective (calculated
maximum dr values of 13:1 and 8:1), the overall
diastereoselectivity is highly reliant on the E/Z selectivity of
the initial enolization conditions.
On the basis of our working stereochemical model, if the
NPhth−Ph(cinnamyl) eclipsing interaction is indeed the
dominant element of stereocontrol, then inversion of the
axial/equatorial positioning of the phenyl group of the
cinnamyl fragment, i.e. employing the Z-cinnamyl ester (19),
leads to an inversion in the chair/boat transition state
preference for both of the corresponding E- and Z-silyl enol
ethers. In this case, the double inversion in stereoselectivity
affords the diastereomer of product 15a identical with that
obtained from E-cinnamyl ester 14.
With respect to the E-cinnamyl system, a global inversion in
the chair/boat transition state preference for both E/Z silyl
enol ethers is predicted (Figure 5). The Z-silyl enol ether (Z)-
20 preferentially rearranges through a boat-like transition state
(TS19) (ΔΔG⧧ = −1.0 kcal/mol), while for E-silyl enol ether
(E)-20, the chair-like transition state (TS20) is preferred
(ΔΔG⧧ = 5.2 kcal/mol). As anticipated, the Ireland−Claisen
rearrangement of Z-cinnamyl ester 19 affords the same
diastereomeric outcome as that with E-cinnamyl ester 14. In
F
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX