tides, natural products than often exhibit significant biological
activity.6
Table 1. Conversion of cis-4-Formyl-â-lactams 1 into
R-Hydroxy Carboxamides 2a
The starting substrates, enantiopure 2-azetidinones 1a-f,
were prepared using standard methodology as single cis
enantiomers from aryl imines of (R)-2,3-O-isopropylidene-
glyceraldehyde, through Staudinger reaction with methoxy-
or benzyloxyacetyl chloride in the presence of Et3N, followed
by sequential acidic acetonide hydrolysis and oxidative
cleavage.7
Thiazole-based organometallics are well documented
reagents for carbonyl addition.8 In this context, we began
this work by investigating the diastereoselectivity of the
addition of cis-4-formyl-â-lactam (+)-1a with 2-(trimeth-
ylsilyl)thiazole (TMST) in dichloromethane. The reaction
provided the enantiomerically pure R-hydroxy acid derivative
(+)-2a in a reasonable 58% isolated yield (Table 1, entry
1). The expected addition product, (+)-3a, was obtained as
a minor component (31%). Polyfunctionalized compound
(+)-2a can be considered both an aldol as well as a Passerini-
type product. Placing a less electron-donating substituent in
the para position of the N-aryl ring decreased the selectivity
of the process (Table 1, entry 2). The NMe2 analogue was a
poor participant (Table 1, entry 3). It was revealed that the
introduction of one halogen atom at the 4-position of the
aromatic ring was slightly effective (Table 1, entry 4). To
further improve the selectivity, we focused on a more
electron-rich aromatic ring. Indeed, placing two electron-
donating substituents in the ortho and para positions of the
aromatic ring at N1 increased the selectivity of the process
(Table 1, entry 5). â-Lactams bearing a benzyl or an allyl
substituent at nitrogen failed to give the R-alkoxy acid
derivative, giving the addition product. No advantage is
gained from changing the methoxy group at C3 to a
benzyloxy (Table 1, entry 6) in the starting (3R,4R)-4-formyl-
â-lactam 1. Switching solvents (acetonitrile, THF, toluene)
had no beneficial effects. In terms of achieving fair yields
with reasonable selectivity of reaction, 0 °C seemed to be
the temperature of choice for running the experiments.
The susceptibility of the reaction to stereochemically
different â-lactam aldehydes was next examined, by explor-
ing the possibility of employing trans-4-formyl-â-lactams
4. Optically pure 2-azetidinones (+)-4a, (-)-4a, and (+)-
4b were prepared adopting literature methodology.9
a TMST ) 2-(trimethylsilyl)thiazole. Thz ) 2-thiazolyl. b Yields are for
pure isolated products with correct analytical and spectroscopic data. In all
cases, compounds 2 and 3 could be easily separated by column chroma-
tography.
Gratifyingly, the corresponding enantiopure R-alkoxy
carboxamides could be obtained (Scheme 1). The (3R,4S)-
4-formyl-â-lactam (-)-4a gave compound (+)-2a, while its
enantiomer (+)-4a gave compound (-)-2a. Addition prod-
ucts 5a-c were obtained as minor components in the
coupling reactions. The higher ratio of R-alkoxy carboxa-
mide/addition product using aldehydes (-)-4a or (+)-4a in
comparison to (+)-1a was mainly due to the inefficiency of
the competitive addition reaction in diastereomeric aldehydes
4, since the opening product accounted as well for a 50%
yield in pure product. In each case, the absolute configuration
of the R-alkoxy acid product matched that of the correspond-
ing â-lactam aldehyde. Therefore, a synthesis of both
enantiomers of R-hydroxy acid derivatives was achieved just
by a subtle variation in the stereochemistry of the aldehyde
component.
(5) See, for instance: (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 993. (b) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo,
C.; Rodr´ıguez-Acebes, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 826. (c) Alcaide, B.;
Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5793. (d) Alcaide, B.;
Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3795. (e) Alcaide, B.;
Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3415.
(6) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Boddy, C. N. C.; Bra¨se, S.; Winssinger, N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2096. (b) Ballard, C. E.; Yu, H.; Wang,
B. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 471.
(7) (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C. Chem. Eur. J. 2002,
8, 1719. (b) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Salgado, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 3310.
(8) (a) Dondoni, A.; Marra, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 13. (b)
Dondoni, A. Synthesis 1998, 1681. (c) Dondoni, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000,
72, 1577.
(9) For (-)-4a, see: (a) Alcaide, B.; Aly, M.; Rodr´ıguez, C.; Rodr´ıguez-
Vicente, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3453. For (+)-4a and (+)-4b, see:
(b) Wagle, D. R.; Garai, C.; Chiang, J.; Monteleone, M. G.; Kurys, B. E.;
Strohmeyer, T. W.; Hedge, V. R.; Manhas, M. S.; Bose, A. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 4227.
It may be possible that, under the reaction conditions, the
initially formed adducts 3 or 5 evolve to the corresponding
R-hydroxy carboxamides 2. However, compounds (+)-3a or
(+)-3f remained unaltered after several days in the presence
of TMST at the above conditions. At present time, we
propose alkoxide 6 as a common intermediate for the thiazole
adducts formation (Scheme 2). Alkoxide 6 may suffer a 1,2
migration of hydrogen with concomitant N1-C4 â-lactam
1766
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 11, 2004