5590
C. C. Galopin / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 5589–5591
O
second attack was directed by the steric hindrance of
the isopropyl group on the b-carbon.
S
Cl-
O
H
O
N
Ph
OH
+
O
Et3N, EtOH
This is in contradiction with the attack of MeLi on
sabina ketone 10, which was shown5 to be directed by
the steric hindrance of the cyclopropane group and
yield the cis-sabinene hydrate 12 as the major product.
6
7
8
NaOH
EtOH, H2O
This difference may be explained by the size of the
nucleophile. The small MeLi may only interact unfa-
vorably with substituents at the a-carbon whereas the
bigger CH2ꢀS(ꢀO)Me2 can interact with substituents
both a- and b- to the ketone. Therefore MeLi will
attack on the less hindered face of the a-carbon (which
is anti to the cyclopropane ring) whereas the sulfoxide
will attack on the less hindered face of the b-carbon
(which is syn to the cyclopropane).
o
O
O
O
O
s
1.1eq
9
3
10
11
3
o
2.2eq
s
In conclusion, we have developed a short and efficient
(28% overall yield) synthesis of trans-sabinene hydrate
by using common reagents. There are only two expen-
sive reagents in this route: Stetter’s thiazolium ion and
the Corey–Chaykovsky reagent precursor, trimethylsul-
foxonium iodide. However, the former is only used in
catalytic amounts while the latter can easily be made in
the laboratory.15
9
OH
O
HO
HO
LiAlH4
+
( )-1
12
13
11
--
Scheme 2. Total synthesis of ( )-1.
Acknowledgements
that decreasing the amount of catalyst to 5 or even 1
mol% increased the yield of the reaction up to 82% but
reaction times of up to 2 days had to be used. Cycliza-
tion was done in 70% as described by Fanta and
Erman.5 Attempts at changing the reaction conditions
of the cyclization only returned lower yields.
I wish to thank Dr. Philip Christenson, Givaudan
Flavors, for helpful discussions and the officers of
Givaudan for permission to publish this work.
References
The cyclopentenone was then cyclopropanated using
the Corey–Chaykovsky reagent 9 made by deprotona-
tion of trimethylsulfoxonium iodide with sodium
hydride.13 To our surprise this reaction resulted in a
mixture of starting material 3, desired product (sabina
ketone, 10) and overreacted product (epoxysabinene,
11) in a 4:3:1 ratio (Scheme 2). Modification of reaction
temperature and mode of addition resulted in the same
type of mixture suggesting that the attack on the very
electrophilic cyclopentanone 10 is faster than the attack
on the unreactive, polysubstituted enone 3.
1. (a) Karasawa, D.; Shimizu, S. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1978, 42
(2), 433–437; (b) Lawrence, B. M. Perf. Flav. 1993,
18(July/August), 67.
2. (a) Libbey, L. M.; Sturtz, G. J. Ess. Oil Res. 1990,
2(July/August), 193–195; (b) Oberdieck, R. Z. Natur-
forsch. 1981, 36, 23–29.
&
3. BaeckStro¨m, P.; Koutek, B.; Saman, D.; Vrkoc, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996, 4 (3), 419–421 and references
cited therein.
4. Patent JP 55051081, 1978 for Lion Corp.
5. Fanta, W. I.; Erman, W. F. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33 (4),
1656–1658.
Since the reduction of epoxysabinene 11 to sabinene
hydrate is known,4 cyclopentenone 3 was reacted with
2.2 equiv. of Corey–Chaykovsky reagent at room tem-
perature in DMSO overnight to be converted com-
pletely to epoxysabinene 11 in 71% yield (Scheme 2).
The epoxide was reduced with LiAlH4 to give a mixture
of ( )-trans-sabinene hydrate ( )-1, ( )-cis-sabinene
hydrate 12 and ( )-sabinane alcohol 13 in a surprising
10:1.6:2.8 ratio.14
6. Marx M. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, 1966, 86–
92
7. Cheng, D.; Knox, K. R.; Cohen, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 412–413.
8. Attempts at building both cycles at the same time either
by ring contraction of a cyclohexadiene, (such as the one
used in the synthesis of Vitamin D3: (a) Gill, Harpal, S.
Gill; Londowski, J. M.; Corradino, R. A.; Zinsmeister,
A. R.; Kumar, R. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 480–490; (b)
Paaren, H. E.; DeLuca, H. F.; Schnoes, H. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1980, 45, 3253–3258) or by addition of isovaleral-
doxime to divinylketone (by extrapolating the cyclo-
propanation method described in Ono, N.; Yanai, T.;
The high trans/cis ratio shows that both attacks of the
Corey–Chaykovsky reagent have taken place on the
same side of the molecule. This would suggest that the