Table 2 Stability constants of 6 with 7a–d, 8–10 in acetone-d6
Thread
7a
7b
7c
7d
8
9
10
b
K [M21]a:
1.5 3 103
1.2 3 103
1.4 3 102
–
6.1 3 103
> 105
1.3 3 103
a Error < 10%. b No evidence of complexation.
6 results in the cationic pyridinium moiety forming an interlocked
assembly with the macrocycle. Interestingly no evidence of
interpenetration was seen with the hexafluorophosphate pyridinium
salt 7d which suggests threading of the pyridinium cation is
accomplished and driven by recognition of the halide anion by the
receptor.8 Stability constant determinations (Table 2) reveal
pseudorotaxane complex thermodynamic stability mirrors the
strength of halide binding by the receptor (Table 1) where chloride
and bromide pyridinium salts form the strongest pseudorotaxane
complexes.
In summary a series of new photo-active rhenium( ) bipyridyl
I
based pseudorotaxane complexes containing various pyridinium,
benzoimidazolium and guanidinium threading components have
been assembled via halide anion templation.
This research has been supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship
(D.C.) of the European Union, and we thank the EPSRC for a
postdoctoral fellowship (F.S.) and studentship (M.R.S.).
Solid state evidence for pseudorotaxane formation comes from
the X-ray structural determination† of the complex 6·7a.
The structural analysis reveals the expected interlocked product
in which the macrocycle encircles the ion-pair. The chloride anion
fits into the cleft of the pyridinium ring, forming five short X–
H…Cl(2) contacts indicative of hydrogen bonding (distances: N(3)
3.417 (0.006) Å, N(4) 3.351 (0.006) Å, N(6) 3.473 (0.013) Å, N(7)
3.281 (0.006) Å, C(42) 3.459 (0.006) Å). These may be regarded as
the vertices of a highly distorted octahedron. The macrocycle
surrounds the cation such that the two phenyl rings are approx-
imately parallel and sandwich the central pyridinium ring. Least
squares calculations show that the two phenyl rings are ~ 7 Å apart
and are parallel to within 6.6°. These two rings therefore allow
enough room for p-stacking with enclosed cation.
Notes and references
†
Single crystals were grown by slow diffusion of Et2O into CHCl3.
Crystallographic data were collected in an Enras-Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer using graphite monocromatised Mo–Ka radiation (l
=
071073 Å). Intensity data were processed using the DENZO-SMN
package.9 The structure was solved by direct methods using the SIR92
program.10 Full matrix least-squares refinement was carried out using the
CRYSTALS program suite.11 A Chebychev polynomial weighting scheme
was applied.
Crystal data for 6+7a·CH2Cl2: T = 150 K, crystal size 0.20 3 0.20 3
0.10 mm, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a = 13.6751 (2), b = 22.3512 (2),
c = 22.6383 (3) Å, b = 105.9996 (5) °, V = 6651.47 (14) Å3, Z = 4, dcalcd
= g cm23, m = 1.990 mm21, R1 (wR2) = 0.0541 (0.0604) for the 8504
unique data with I > 3s(I) and 781 parameters.
As evidenced by 1H-NMR titration experiments it is noteworthy
that other strongly ion-paired4 nicotinamide 8, benzoimidazolium
9, and methylguanidinium 10 chloride anion salts also form strong
pseudorotaxane complexes in acetone-d6 solutions (Table 2).
Because the respective cationic species is strongly ion-paired to the
chloride counterion, halide recognition by 6 results in threading of
the cationic component through the macrocyclic cavity.
crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
1 V. Balzani, A. Credi and F. M. Raymo and J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3349; Special issue on molecular machines, Acc.
Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 409.
Preliminary absorption and emission investigations reveal 6
behaves like the parent Rebipy(CO)3Cl complex. As was hoped the
addition of 7a, 8, 9 and 10 was found to affect the luminescence
spectrum of 6 with a significant enhancement in emission intensity
(Fig. 5) which may be a consequence of pseudorotaxane complex
formation increasing the rigidity6 of the receptor, disfavouring non-
radiative decay processes.
2 J. F. Stoddart and S. A. Nepogodiev, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1959; F.
Vögtle, T. Duennwald and T. Schmidt, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 451;
C. A. Hunter, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5303; C. O. Dietrich-
Buchecker, J.-P. Sauvage and J. M. Kern, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106,
3043; A. G. Johnston, D. A. Leigh, R. H. Pritchard and M. D. Deegan,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1209; M. Fujita, F. Ibukuro, H.
Hagihara and K. Ogura, Nature, 1994, 367, 720; S. J. Loeb and J. A.
Wisner, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2757.
3 G. M. Hubner, C. Reuter, C. Seel and F. Vögtle, Synthesis, 2000, 103;
P. R. Ashton, S. J. Cantrill, J. A. Preece, J. F. Stoddart, Z.-H. Wang, A.
J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 1917; M. Montaldi
and L. Prodi, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1461.
4 J. A. Wisner, P. D. Beer and M. G. B. Drew, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2001, 40, 3606; J. A. Wisner, P. D. Beer, N. G. Berry and B.
Tomapatanaget, PNAS., 2002, 99, 4983.
5 J. A. Wisner, P. D. Beer, M. G. B. Drew and M. R. Sambrook, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 12469.
6 P. D. Beer, F. Szemes, V. Balzani, C. M. Salà, M. G. W. Drew, S. W.
Dent and M. Maestri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11864; L. H.
Uppadine, J. E. Redman, S. W. Dent, M. G. B. Drew and P. D. Beer,
Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 2860.
Fig. 4 Stick representation of the solid state structure of pseudorotaxane
6+7a.
7 M. J. Hynes, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993, 311.
8 Sequential addition of one equivalent of TBACl to 6 followed by 7d
leads to pseudorotaxane formation as evidenced by 1H-NMR in acetone-
d6.
9 Z. Otwinowski and W. Minor, ‘Processing of X-ray Diffraction Data
Collected in Oscillation Mode’, Methods Enzymol., Eds C. W. Carter
and R. M. Sweet, Academic Press, 1997, 276.
10 A. Altomare, G. Gascanaro, G. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, M. C. Burla,
G. Ploidori and M. Camalli, J. Appl. Cryst., 1994, 27, 435.
11 D. Watkin, C. K. Prout, J. R. Carruthers, P. W. Battaeridge and R. I.
Cooper, CRYSTALS, issue 11, Chemical crystallography Laboratory,
Oxford, UK, 2001.
Fig. 5 Emission spectral variations upon titration of 6 (2 3 1025 M in
acetone) with 7a in acetone; (lexc. = 400 nm)
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 1 6 2 – 1 1 6 3
1163