S. Auvin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 3825–3828
3827
steric bulk of the antioxidant moiety, this compound
was capable of binding to the calpain active site. Pre-
vious work in the domain of hybrid compounds, showed
that Troloxâ based NOS inhibitors,6 exhibited strong
lipid peroxidation inhibition, however, in 6a, the
Troloxâ moiety conferred a weaker activity than
expected. Thus, the antioxidant potency of a molecule
not only depends on the nature of the antioxidant
moiety used, but also on the molecular structure as a
whole. In the phenothiazine series, the advantageous
contribution of the relatively flat heterocyclic ring was
highlighted by the performance of compounds 6b and 6c
in the calpain test. The 2-subsituted phenothiazine 6b
had better affinity than the 1-substituted phenothiazine
6c for the calpain active site. The superior inhibitory
potency of 6b in the calpain test (IC50 ¼ 22.5 nM) was
accompanied by a dramatic improvement in the free
radical scavenging activity with an IC50 ¼ 70 nM. A final
attempt to modify the antioxidant moiety of the mole-
cule was illustrated by the use of the benzyl-aminoind-
oline 1d. The compound 6d proved to be as active as 6b
in the calpain test, however with lower antioxidant
activity. A structural comparison of 6b and 6d demon-
strated that a nearly planar heterocyclic system was
required at the N-terminal position to achieve a high
level of calpain inhibition.
in the C6 cell test was a consequence of moderate cell
permeation.
Accordingly, the free hydroxyl group was masked in
order to enhance the cellular activity. Compound 6b
was transformed into 7 with acetic anhydride in the
presence of DMAP (Scheme 1). This acetylation of the
semi-acetal ring generated a non-equilibrated two-
diastereomeric mixture of 7 with a ratio of (83/17) as
determined by NMR experiments. In the human calpain
1 assay, as expected, 7 did not show any significant
activity (IC50 > 1 lM). However, to our satisfaction, 7
was 1.8-fold more active than 6b in the C6 cell test and
2.5-fold in the necrosis test, which demonstrated that 7
was able to regenerate 6b inside the cell. Furthermore,
the LPO inhibitory activity was conserved for 7.
3. Conclusion
This study demonstrates the synthetic feasibility of
obtaining dual calpain/LPO inhibitors in spite of the
steric bulk of the antioxidant moiety. Calpain was
indeed very sensitive to the nature of the antioxidant
group and 2-substituted phenothiazines proved to be
superior to the other antioxidants in the calpain and
LPO tests. Compound 6b was not only a potent inhib-
itor of isolated calpain but also a powerful free radical
scavenger, with comparable activities in both tests.
Compound 7, a prodrug of 6b, proved to be superior to
6b in cellular assays and furthermore, these hybrid
compounds were much more active than Z-LL-H in the
protection against C6 glial cell death. Compound 7 is
currently undergoing further in vivo evaluation.
In the light of these results compounds 6b and 6d, were
chosen for further in vitro studies involving cellular
calpain inhibition12 in C6 glial cells and protection
against C6 glial cell death induced by maitotoxin.13 The
latter requires calpain inhibition associated with free
radical scavenging activity to protect the cells. Z-LL-H
and BHT were used as reference compounds (Table 2).
Surprisingly, 6d was devoid of activity in the glial cell
test. Whether 6d was unable to penetrate into the cell or
whether it was degraded inside the cell remains unclear.
On the contrary, 6b was active in the C6 calpain inhi-
bition test, although less potent than Z-LL-H. The
superiority of 6b versus Z-LL-H was revealed in the
protection against cell death test, where 6b had an
IC50 ¼ 38.5 lM whereas Z-LL-H, and BHT were weakly
active (100 lM). Since 6b showed good enzyme inhibi-
tion (Table 1), we hypothesized that its modest activity
Acknowledgements
ꢀ
The authors would like to thank Jose Camara and team
for their helpful discussions and advice.
References and notes
1. (a) Ray, S. K.; Banik, N. L. Current Drug Targets: CNS
Neurol. Disorders 2003, 2, 173; (b) Otto, Hans-Hartwig;
Schirmeister, T. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 133.
Table 2. Calpain and cell death inhibitions in C6 glial cells for com-
pounds 6b, 6d and 7
O
H
2. Iqbal, M.; Messina, P. A.; Freed, B.; Das, M.; Chatterjee,
S.; Tripathy, R.; Tao, M.; Josef, K. A.; Dembofsky, B.;
Dunn, D.; Griffith, E.; Siman, R.; Sedanhi, S. E.; Biazzo,
W.; Bozyczko-Coyne, D.; Meyer, S. L.; Ator, M. A.;
Bihovsky, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 539.
3. Sgaragli, G. P.; Valoti, M.; Gorelli, B.; Fusi, F.; Palmi,
M.; Mantovani, P. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 110, 369.
4. Chabrier, P.-E.; Pignol, B.; Auvin, S. PCT Int. Appl. WO
0240016, 2002; Chem. Abstr. 2002, 136, 380140.
5. (a) Donkor Isaac, O. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 1171; (b)
Nakamura, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Sakai, O.; Inoue, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 1371.
6. Chabrier, P.-E.; Auguet, M.; Spinnewyn, B.; Auvin, S.;
ꢀ
Cornet, S.; Demerle Pallardy, C.; Guilmard Favre, C.;
R
N
O
N
H
O
O
R2
Compds
R
R2
C6 Calp Inh.
IC50, lM
Cell death Inh.
IC50, lM
6d
6b
1d
1b
1b
H
>100
nt
H
Ac
23.49 2.12
13.34 1.23
3.04 0.33
na
38.5 5.77
15.5 1.46
16% at 100 lM
21% at 100 lM
7
Z-LL-H
BHT
nt, not tested; na, not active.