.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 2: Substrate scope of the hydrogenation of oxime ethers to O-protected hydroxylamines.[a]
methyl-substituted
oxime
1b.
Reduction to hydroxylamine 2b
indeed occurred, but no catalytic
turnover was achieved (entry 2).
This result is in agreement with
a similar observation by Stephan
and co-workers during the hydro-
genation of sterically less-demand-
ing imines.[13a] According to Pꢀpai
and co-workers, the formation of
stable Lewis pairs with sterically
unhindered amines that accumu-
late over the course of the reaction
inhibits the catalysis.[14c] As the
catalyst system B(C6F5)3/Mes3P
(Mes = mesityl), known to be supe-
rior to B(C6F5)3 in the reduction of
imines,[14a] showed no improvement
(entry 3), we decided to test oxime
ether 1c, which bears a tert-butyl
group at the oxygen atom. Gratify-
ingly, 1c showed 95% conversion at
a dihydrogen pressure of 60 bar at
room temperature (entry 4). The
reaction proved to be highly che-
Entry
Oxime
ether
R1
R2
R3
Hydroxyl-
amine
T
[8C]
Conv.
[%][b]
Yield
[%][c]
1
2
3c
3 f
Me
Me
tBu
SiiPr3
10c
10 f
25
60
>99
>99
80
99
3
4c
4 f
Me
Me
tBu
SiiPr3
11c
11 f
25
60
>99
>99
96
97
4[d]
5
5c
5 f
Et
Et
tBu
SiiPr3
12c
12 f
25
60
>99
>99
99
99
6[d]
7
8
6c
6 f
Me
Me
tBu
SiiPr3
13c
13 f
25
25
>99
>99
96
95
9[e]
10
7c
7 f
Me
Me
tBu
SiiPr3
14c
14 f
60
25
95
>99
94[f]
99
ꢀ
moselective. Neither N O bond
11[d]
12[d]
8c
8 f
tBu
SiiPr3
15c
15 f
60
60
90
50
66[f]
n.d.
fission nor other side reactions
were observed, with only hydroxyl-
amine 2c and remaining 1c
detected. Increasing the dihydro-
gen pressure to 100 bar resulted in
full conversion, and enabled the
isolation of 2c in excellent yield
(entry 5).[16] We then turned our
attention to O-silylated oximes,
which would allow us to subse-
quently liberate the unprotected
ꢀ
13
14
9c
9 f
tBu
SiiPr3
16c
16 f
60
60
>99
>99
n.d.[g]
99
[a] Reactions were performed on a 0.12–0.14 mmol scale. [b] Determined by GLC analysis. [c] Deter-
mined after purification by filtering through a small plug of silica gel. [d] Reaction was performed with
10 mol% B(C6F5)3. [e] Reaction was performed with 8.2 mol% B(C6F5)3. [f] Calculated yield, contains
starting material. [g] Not isolated because of its volatility. n.d.=not determined.
hydroxylamine by facile Si O bond cleavage. Again, the
steric demand of the substituent was the key to success.
Oxime ethers 1d (entry 6) and 1e (entry 7) were not fully
converted into the corresponding hydroxylamines, but hydro-
genation of triisopropylsilyl-substituted oxime 1 f (entry 8)
afforded hydroxylamine 2 f in quantitative yield at a dihydro-
gen pressure of 60 bar at room temperature. It is noteworthy
that neither 1e and 1 f nor tert-butyl-substituted 1c showed
adduct formation with B(C6F5)3 at room temperature, as
verified by 11B and 19F NMR spectroscopy.
electron-donating substituents (entries 3 and 4) were con-
verted into the corresponding hydroxylamines, with the O-
silyl oximes requiring elevated temperatures to reach full
conversion. Prolonged reaction times at room temperature
generally had little or no effect on the conversion. Even the
Lewis basic methoxy substituent in oxime ethers 4c and 4 f is
tolerated under these reaction conditions. Likewise, halogen-
ated (entries 5–8) and ortho-substituted substrates (entries 9
and 10) were successfully hydrogenated. No dehalogenation
was observed for chloro-substituted 5c/5 f and bromo-sub-
stituted 6c/6 f. Benzophenone-derived oxime ethers were far
less reactive (entries 11 and 12), not exceeding 50% con-
version in the case of O-silyl-substituted oxime 8 f even at
elevated temperature and higher catalyst loading. Aliphatic
oxime ethers 9c and 9 f reacted poorly at room temperature,
but showed complete conversion at 608C (entries 13 and 14).
Although the reduction of unprotected oximes had failed
(see Table 1, entry 1), the deprotection of O-silylated hydrox-
ylamines was considered to be a way to liberate the hydroxyl-
amine functionality. To illustrate its feasibility, we investi-
gated the removal of the silyl protecting group of O-silylated
To our surprise, related benzaldehyde-derived oxime
ethers were completely inert under these reaction conditions.
Lewis acid/base pairing was again excluded by means of NMR
spectroscopy. We think that aldehyde-based oxime ethers are
not sufficiently Lewis basic at the nitrogen atom to participate
in the cooperative dihydrogen activation.
With the optimal substituents at the oxygen atom
identified, we set out to explore the substrate scope of the
hydrogenation. Representative O-tert-butyl (3c–9c) and O-
triisopropylsilyl oxime ethers (3 f–9 f) were treated with
B(C6F5)3 at 100 bar dihydrogen pressure (Table 2). Oxime
ethers bearing electron-withdrawing (entries 1 and 2) or
ꢀ
2 f. Cleavage of the Si O bond was observed under acidic as
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!