6288 Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 26, 2005
Communications
Scheme 1. Preparation of Ru(acac)2(K2-PPh2Py)
(2)
accessibility. Among the hybrid ligands for homogeneous
catalytic reactions,7 the P,N hybrid ligands have at-
tracted considerable attention, especially in late-transi-
tion-metal catalysts.8 Grotjahn and co-workers have
reported that ruthenium complexes having a bifunc-
tional P,N ligand exhibited an enzyme-like enhance-
ment of rate and selectivity in the anti-Markovnikov
hydration of terminal alkynes.9 Grotjahn’s ruthenium
catalysts were inactive for hydration of a nitrile group;
however, the P,N ligand system seemed promising as a
potential hydration catalyst for other multiple bonds.
Therefore, we prepared new ruthenium complexes hav-
ing the phosphine 1 and acac ligand.10
Figure 1. Molecular structures of 2 (left) and 3 (right).
Scheme 2. Preparation of cis-Ru(acac)2(PPh2Py)2
(3)
A new Ru(acac)2-PPh2py complex was prepared by
a modifying the procedure for Ru(acac)2(PR3)2 estab-
lished by Bennett and Ernst.11 Treatment of Ru(acac)2-
(η2-C8H14)2
with 1 in a mixed solvent of THF and
11b
comparable to those reported for cis-Ru(acac)2(PR3)2.11
The O(2)-Ru-P(1) angle (163.10(5)°) deviates from the
ideal 180°, whereas the O(1)-Ru-O(3) and O(4)-Ru-
N(1) angles are close to 180°. The small bite angle
(69.80(6)°) for P(1)-Ru-N(1) is ascribed to the forma-
tion of the four-membered chelate ring. The Ru-P(1)
and Ru-N(1) distances are shorter than those reported
for RuCl2(κ2-PPh2Py)(CO)2 (Ru-P ) 2.322(2) Å and
Ru-N ) 2.119(6) Å).10a The ligand 1 strongly co-
ordinates to the Ru(acac)2 unit as compared to the
RuCl2(CO)2 unit.
The solid-state six-coordinate structure is consistent
with that observed in solution. Four nonequivalent
methyl signals of two acac ligands appeared at δ 1.78,
1.92, 1.95, and 2.20 in the 1H NMR spectra. A variable-
temperature 1H NMR experiment revealed that 2
maintains a six-coordinate structure from 25 to 75 °C
in C6D6 solution.
The nitrogen atom of 1 that is coordinated to the
ruthenium center proved to be labile. Treatment of
2 with 1 equiv of 1 in C6D6 afforded cis-Ru(acac)2-
(PPh2py)2 (3) quantitatively (Scheme 2). Complex 3 was
also prepared by the reaction of Ru(acac)2(isoprene)12
with 2 equiv of 1. Two phosphorus atoms coordinated
to the ruthenium center (δ 57.9 in 31P{1H} NMR). The
slightly distorted octahedral structure of 3 was revealed
by X-ray crystallographic analysis.14 The bond elonga-
tion of Ru-O lengths trans to the phosphorus atoms
(Ru-O(2) ) 2.089(1) Å and Ru-O(4) ) 2.103(1) Å) is
attributed to the trans influence of the PPh2py ligands
(Ru-O(1) ) 2.066(2) Å and Ru-O(3) ) 2.064(2) Å).
Catalytic hydration of nitriles was examined using
benzonitrile as a substrate (Table 1). Treatment of a
mixture of benzonitrile with the catalyst 2 and water
in 1,2-dimethoxyethane at 180 °C for 3 h afforded
water at 30 °C gave Ru(acac)2(κ2-PPh2py) (2) in 78%
yield (Scheme 1). Attempts to prepare 2 from the diene
complexes Ru(acac)2(2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene)11a and
Ru(acac)2(isoprene)12 failed.
An X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed that 2 has
a monomeric discrete molecular structure (Figure 1).13
The structural parameters for the Ru(acac)2 unit are
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Slone, C. S.; Weinberger, D. A.; Mirkin, C.
A. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 48, 233. (b) Braunstein, P.; Naud, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 680.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Mueller, C.; Lachicotte, R. J.; Jones,
W. D. Organometallics 2002, 21, 1975. (b) Kuriyama, M.; Nagai, K.;
Yamada, K.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Tomioka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 8932. (c) Braunstein, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3953.
(d) Kno¨pfel, T. E.; Aschwanden, P.; Ichikawa, T.; Watanabe, T.;
Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5971. (e) Yu, J. O.;
Lam, E.; Sereda, J. L.; Rampersad, N. C.; Lough, A. J.; Browning, C.
S.; Farrar, D. H. Organometallics 2005, 24, 37. (f) Abdur-ashid, K.;
Guo, R.; Lough, A. J.; Morris, R. H. Song, D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005,
347, 571. (g) Wu, J.; Ji, J.-X.; Chan, A. S. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
2005, 102, 3570. (h) Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M.; Claver, C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3646. (i) Ito, M.; Kitahara, S.; Ikariya, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 6172.
(9) (a) Grotjahn, D. B.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3884. (b) Grotjahn, D. B.; Lev, D. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12232.
(10) Several ruthenium complexes bearing 1 were prepared. (a)
Olmstead, M. M.; Maisonnet, A.; Farr, J. P.; Balch, A. L. Inorg. Chem.
1981, 20, 4060. (b) Maisonnet, A.; Farr, J. P.; Olmstead, M. M.; Hunt,
C. T.; Balch, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 3961. (c) Schutte, R. P.;
Rettig, S. J.; Joshi, A. M.; James, B. R. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 5809.
(d) Caballero, A.; Jalon, F. A.; Manzand, B. R. Chem. Commun. 1998,
1879. (e) Rida, M. A.; Coperet, C.; Smith, A. K. J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 628, 1. (f) Lalrempuia, R.; Carroll, P. J.; Kollipara, M. R. J. Chem.
Sci. 2004, 116, 21.
(11) (a) Ernst, R. D.; Mele´ndez, E.; Stahl, L. Ziegler, M. L. Organo-
metallics 1991, 10, 3635. (b) Bennett, M. A.; Chung, G.; Hockless, D.
C. R.; Neumann, H.; Willis, A. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999,
3451. (c) Bennett, M. A.; Byrnes, M. J.; Willis, A. C. Organometallics
2003, 22, 1018. (d) Bennett, M. A.; Byrnes, M. J.; Kovacik, I. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 4463. (e) Bennett, M. A.; Byrnes, M. J.;
Chung, G.; Edwards, A.; Willis, A. C. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358,
1692.
(12) Mele´ndez, E.; Ilarraza, R.; Yap, G. P. A.; Rheingold, A. L. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1996, 522, 1.
(13) Crystal data for 2:
triclinic, P1h (No. 2), a ) 11.0230(8) Å, b ) 11.207(1) Å, c ) 12.7551(8)
Å, R ) 72.3808(7)°, â ) 67.497(5)°, γ ) 81.631(1)°, V ) 1386.6(2) Å3, Z
) 2, Dcalcd ) 1.456 g cm-3, µ(Mo KR) ) 6.59 cm-1, 11 393 reflections
measured, R1 ) 0.036, wR2 ) 0.089.
C
27H28NO4PRu‚0.5C6H5CH3; T ) 150 K,
(14) Crystal data for 3: C44H42N2O4P2Ru; T ) 150 K, triclinic, P1h
(No. 2), a ) 10.224(1) Å, b ) 10.799(2) Å, c ) 17.946(3) Å, R )
75.988(10)°, â ) 88.433(10)°, γ ) 81.196(6)°, V ) 1899.7(5) Å3, Z ) 2,
Dcalcd ) 1.444 g cm-3, µ(Mo KR) ) 5.43 cm-1, 15 740 reflections
measured, R1 ) 0.034, wR2 ) 0.109.