2606
A. L. Sabb et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 2603–2607
Table 4. Affinity and function of cycloalkyl[b][1,4]benzodiazepinoin-
dole analogues at 5-HT2C and 5-HT2A receptors
rat model of feeding behavior, showing reduce feeding
behavior with an ED50 of 21 mg/Kg, ip. Substitution on
any ring of the WAY-629 structure reduced affinity for
the 5-HT2C receptor.
Ki, nM agonist binding
7;a
Compound
Function: (%Emax)
5-HT2C
5-HT2A
The cyclopentyl, cycloheptyl, and cyclooctyl analogues
of WAY-629 (1, 10, and 11) are also 5-HT2C agonists.
The cyclooctyl analogue 11 (WAY-470) was found to
be the most potent and efficacious (Ki 13 nM, Emax
102%) 5-HT2C agonist in this series.
1
97 (90)
985
599
922 (9)
2531
1231
Ndb
2
3
4
358
111
5
Ndb
6
243
79
Ndb
152
7
8
452
189
Ndb
References and notes
9
1559
199
36 (80)c
10
11
38 (73)
13 (102)
1. Hoyer, D.; Clarke, D. E.; Fozard, J. R.; Hartig, P. R.;
Martin, G. R.; Mylecharane, E. J.; Saxena, P. R.;
Humphrey, P. P. A. Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 157.
2. Robichaud, A. J.; Largent, B. L. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.
2000, 5, 11.
a % Emax not listed was not done.
b Nd ¼ not done.
c EC50 64,000 nM.
3. Fitzgerald, L. W.; Ennis, M. D. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.
2002, 37, 21.
4. Martin, G. E.; Elgin, R. J., Jr.; Mathiasen, J. R.; Davis, C.
B.; Kesslick, J. M.; Baldy, W. J.; Shank, R. P.; DiStefano,
D. L.; Fedde, C. L.; Scott, M. K. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32,
1052.
5. Tecott, L. H.; Sun, L. M.; Akana, S. F.; Strack, A. M.;
Lowenstein, D. H.; Dallman, M. F.; Julius, D. Nature
1995, 374, 542.
6. Kim, D. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1975, 12, 1323; Kim, D.
U.S. Patent 3,914,250, 1975, CAN 84:31150.
Subsequently we examined the effect of the size of the
cycloalkyl ring on 5-HT2C affinity. Reducing the cyclo-
hexyl ring of WAY-629 to cyclopentyl gave a somewhat
less potent 1 (Ki 97 nM), whereas increasing the size of
the cycloalkyl ring from cyclohexyl to cycloheptyl
improved the 5-HT2C affinity of 10 (Ki 38 nM), although
the compound was a weaker agonist than WAY-629
(73% efficacy for 10 vs 90% efficacy for WAY-629).
7. Pharmacology: Affinity and function: Receptor binding
studies and functional activity measures were done in
CHO cells stably transfected with human receptors, with
the exception of the transporter binding, which was also
done in rat.
The cyclooctyldiazepinoindole analogue 11 was found
to have potent affinity at the 5-HT2C receptor (Ki 13 nM)
and to be a full agonist (102% efficacy). The selectivity
profile of 11 versus 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A 5-HT2B, dopamine
D3, D4, a1, and the rat 5-HT transporter is summarized
in Table 5. Although the binding affinity of 11 is sepa-
rated by 3-fold from binding to the 5-HT2A receptor, a
372-fold separation is achieved in function. The affinity
of 11 to the 5-HT2B receptor is >5000 nM. In addition,
11 (WAY-470) is selective in binding versus other
receptors tested and versus the rat serotonin transporter.
Affinity: Inhibition of [125I] DOI binding was used to
measure affinity to 5-HT2C (VNI isoform) and 5-HT2A
receptors; Inhibition of 8-OH-DPAT binding was used to
measure affinity to 5-HT1A receptors; Inhibition of
[3H]LSD binding was used to measure affinity to 5-HT6
and 5-HT7 receptors; Inhibition of [3H]spiperone binding
to used to measure affinity; Inhibition of [3H]paroxetine
binding was used to measure affinity to the serotonin
transporter; Inhibition of a1 adrenergic receptor binding
was used to measure a1 binding.
In summary, a series of cycloalkyl[b][1,4]benzodiaze-
pinoindoles has been discovered, which are agonists at
the human 5-HT2C receptor. Our lead molecule, WAY-
629, 1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11-octahydro[1,4]diazepino[6,5,4-jk]-
carbazole is a 5-HT2C agonist selective for the 5-HT2C
receptor versus several other serotonin receptor sub-
types, the serotonin transporter, and other nonserotonin
receptors and ion channels. WAY-629 is also active in a
Function: Stimulation of [3H]inositol monophosphate
production was used to measure the degree of agonism
in 5-HT2C and 5-HT2A receptors.
8. Feeding behavior in rats: Eight (8) male Sprague–Dawley
rats weighing 150–180 g were separated into individual
cages and acclimated to a powdered diet for 2 weeks.
During this period and throughout the test procedure, the
food cup and the animals were weighed daily. Following
the acclimation period, animals were fasted for 24 h and
then injected with either vehicle or one of 4 doses of the
test compound. Food intake was assessed at 2 and 24 h
following compound administration. Compounds to be
evaluated were injected 1–2 ꢀ per week until all animals
had received all doses of the test compound. The order of
doses were chosen using a modified Latin Square design.
Additional studies may be conducted in satiated rats at the
start of the dark cycle. Compounds were injected ip, sc, or
given po. At the end of the study effects of the test
compound on food intake were evaluated using a repeated
measures ANOVA. Data collected were for 2 h food
intake (g). Data were subjected to a one-way ANOVA
with posthoc t-test to assess group differences. Where
Table 5. Profile of 11 (WAY-470)7
H
N
N
Inhibition @ 1 lM
5-HT1A
4%
5-HT2B (Ki)
>5000 nM
r5-HT
14%
D3
D4
a1 (Ki)
37%
47%
665 nM