1440
A.K. De et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 57 (2001) 1427–1441
mixture of dynamic (photoinduced ET) and static
type (both pure and transient) quenching modes,
the existences of which are however, confirmed
from both steady state and time resolved tech-
niques. Further the possibility of external heavy
atom effect on the fluorescence quenching of the
acceptor 9CNA observed with gradual addition of
the donor (quencher) SeP could not be ignored as
the latter contains heavy atom ‘Se’. Thus it can be
inferred that in addition to the dynamic and static
quenching, another quenching reaction ‘external
heavy atom effect’ should possibly be involved in
the overall quenching mechanism. Possibly due to
presence of various quenching reactions, as pro-
posed above, from the different experimental find-
ings, the quenching data could not be fitted using
the model proposed by Eftink and Ghiron which
was used for the systems where only collisional
(dynamic) and static modes were present. From
the observations made in the present investiga-
tion, a model, as shown by Eq. (4), has been
proposed where an additional parameter ‘k’ has
been included in the proposed model of Eftink
and Ghiron and the experimental quenching data
fit in this model in a much better way as shown
above. The best fit of the quenching data to Eq.
(4) is reproduced in the Fig. 7.
the fluorescer but it might happen that after the
excitation of the 9CNA ring, the quencher (SeP)
,
can diffuse the extra 8–9 A (contact distance,
,
rD+rAꢀ8.5 A) so rapidly that the quenching still
appears instantaneous. This points to the dynamic
character predicted by the transient effect model
[19]. Thus from the present investigation it may be
surmised that SeP acts as a weak quencher but it
shows diverse character in quenching mechanism
of the excited singlet state (S1) of the acceptor
9CNA. It deactivates nonradiatively the S1 level
of 9CNA as an electron donor as well as heavy
atom quencher and also through pure static and
transient quenching mechanisms.
From the present investigation it seemingly in-
dicates that dynamic quenching is only due to
presence of highly exothermic (DG0ꢀ −1.25 eV)
photoinduced ET process within the present react-
ing systems. The very weak, much smaller than
the diffusion-controlled rate kd in ACN (ꢀ1.9×
1010 dm3 mol−1
s
−1) [20,21], dynamic quenching
−1) points to the
rate (6.4×106 dm3 mol−1
s
possibility of the occurrences of ET reaction in
Marcus inverted region (mir) where outer sphere
ET producing radical ion pair might not be so
fast as to give diffusion controlled ET quenching
rate. The possibility of occurrence of ET reaction
in mir is further corroborated from the finding of
larger −DG0 value than that of u, nuclear reorga-
nization energy parameter (Table 2). However for
conclusive evidence for mir, investigations using
other well known electron acceptors with SeP are
needed. The work is under progress.
The best fit values of KSV and V are 0.07 and 13
dm3 mol−1 respectively (Table 2). Large values
(ꢀ3300) were observed in case of k which might
arise from more than one quenching process (pos-
sibly from external heavy atom effect and static
quenching).
The values of KSV and V are in accord to our
expectation. Very small value of KSV (ꢀ0.07)
indicate very weak dynamic quenching rate (ꢀ
6.4×106 dm3 mol−1
s
−1) which actually appears
4. Concluding remarks
from the quenching studies as discussed above.
From the value of V(ꢀ13 dm3 mol−1), the ra-
dius r of the active volume was computed using
the well-known relationship
The newly synthesized selenophene compound
SeP exhibits singlet (n0p*) in nonpolar MCH and
1Lb(p,p*) state in highly polar ACN as a lowest
excited level. No emission was found from the
former state, whereas a very weak fluorescence
emission from the latter level possibly due to
internal heavy atom effect was observed. The
nonemissive behavior of the former state might be
due to space forbiddenness with the ground side.
The lack of phosphorescence of SeP has been
V
N%
4
3
= yr3 (N% is the Avogadro’s number
per mmol).
,
The value of r was estimated to be 17 A. This
indicates that at the exact moment of excitation
the quencher may not be in physical contact with