1314 Original Papers
lated from Dacrydium spp. (1, 4, and 5) showed strong inhibition
oxygenated substitution patterns. Robustaflavone (5), character-
ized by a C3′-C6′′ linkage, is newly described as a strong inhibitor
of the DENV‑NS5 RdRp (IC50 comprised between 0.26 and
1.3 µM). Hinokiflavone (4), with an IC50 = 0.26 µM, is the most po-
tent DENV polymerase inhibitor, but it was cytotoxic on COS and
BHK cells [6]. Robustaflavone (5) also strongly inhibits the
DENV‑NS5 RdRp (CI50 = 0.33 µM) and is not cytotoxic according
to results exposed in the literature [12]. This compound was also
described as a potent HBV replication inhibitor [13]. Amentofla-
vone (1) was previously shown to be a strong and specific noncy-
totoxic inhibitor of the DENV‑NS5 RdRp [6]. Cupressuflavone (12)
was significantly less active (CI50 > 5 µM).
of the DENV‑NS5 RdRp (IC50 = 0.33 µM). Sotetsuflavone (IC50
=
0.16 µM), the 7′′-O-methylamentoflavone (8), is the strongest in-
hibitor of the DENV‑NS5 RdRp among the tested compounds. It is
also one of the strongest nonnucleotide inhibitors of the
DENV‑NS5 RdRp described in the literature so far [7,15,16]. Inhi-
bition assays of robustaflavone and amentoflavone derivatives on
infected cells should be performed to complete the evaluation of
the antidengue potential of these compounds.
Comparison of the DENV‑NS5 RdRp inhibitory activities of amen-
toflavone (1) and its methylated derivatives 2, 3, and 6–11 (see
l Table 1) shows that the position and number of methoxy
Materials and Methods
!
"
groups modulate the biological activity of the compounds. Thus,
all monomethylated compounds (2, 6, 7, and 8) displayed a lower
IC50 on the DENV polymerase (respectively, 0.75, 0.46, 0.64, and
0.16 µM) than amentoflavone (1) (IC50 = 1.3 µM). The presence of
two or three methoxy groups at C-7 and/or C-4 positions of both
apigenin units (3, 9, and 10) appears to slightly decrease the ac-
tivity (IC50 comprised between 1.0 to 3.1 µM). Methylations in
positions 7 and 7′′ on the amentoflavone skeleton seem to be
the most favorable to inhibit the DENV‑NS5 activity, since com-
pounds 6 and 8 were more active than 2 and 7. These slight mod-
ulations of the activity by the number and position of methoxy
groups could be attributed to the modification of the polarity
and of the capacity to establish hydrogen bonds with DENV poly-
merase as suggested in other studies [14]. On the contrary, meth-
ylation of both 5-OH groups clearly decreases the inhibitory ac-
tivity on the DENV-RdRp, since compound 11 displayed an IC50
equal to 50 µM probably due to steric and electronic modifica-
tions of 11 vs. other amentoflavone derivatives, related to the lack
of the well-known hydrogen bond between the 5-OH group and
carbonyl function in 11.
In order to extend our comprehension of the SAR of flavonoids on
the DENV‑NS5 RdRp, apigenin (13) and 10 related flavonoids
(14–23) were tested on the DENV polymerase. These compounds
only weakly inhibited DENV‑NS5, justifying that their inhibitory
activities are, for most of them, only described at the single con-
centration of 50 µM. Again, the number and position of methyla-
tions on the genin influenced the ability of flavonoids to inhibit
the DENV‑NS5 RdRp. However, dimethoxylation was here the
most favorable since the 7,4′-dimethylapigenin (16) was the
strongest inhibitor (92% inhibition at 50 µM) among the tested
flavonoids monomers. The results of polymerase inhibition for
other related flavonoid monomers suggest that the degree and
the position of oxygenation also influence their inhibitory activ-
ity. Thus, quercetin (21), rhamnetin (22), and kaempferol (23),
which inhibit more than 90% of the enzyme activity at 50 µM,
were significantly more active than apigenin (13), pinocembrin
(18), naringenin (19), and galangin (20). Compounds 21, 22, and
23 belong to the 3-flavonol subtype, such as galangin (20). They
are unsubstituted on the lateral ring and present a weaker activ-
ity than 20. These results suggest that the simultaneous presence
of oxygenated substituents on the three rings of the flavone in-
creases the inhibitory activity on the DENV‑NS5 RdRp.
Plant material and crude extracts
Leaves of Dacrydium araucarioides were harvested in Prony in
April 2009 (22°16′02′′S; 166°50′07′′E), in the South province of
New Caledonia (Province Sud authorization N°10919–2009). A
voucher specimen (reference: Cou 11), identified by Dr. Jérome
Munzinger (IRD), was deposited at the herbarium of the IRD cen-
ter of Nouméa.
General experimental procedures
Cupressuflavone (12), apigenin (13), pinocembrin (18), naringe-
nin (19), galangin (20), quercetin (21), rhamnetin (22), and
kaempferol (23) were purchased from Extrasynthèse. The struc-
ture of all isolated compounds from D. araucarioides was deter-
mined by NMR and HRMS data analysis and by comparison with
data from the literature [8–10]. Spectral data are available in the
Supporting Information. 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker AM-300 and Bruker AM-400 instruments, at room
temperature. APCI and ESIMS spectra were recorded on an Agi-
lent MSD G1946D spectrometer and HRESIMS spectra on a
Bruker MicroTOF Q‑II spectrometer. Copies of the original spectra
are available from the corresponding author. Analytical HPLC‑UV
were performed on an Agilent HP1100 instrument equipped
with a Waters Sunfire C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm), at a flow
rate of 1 mL/min. Preparative HPLC was performed on a Waters
Deltaprep equipped with a sunfire RP-18 column (19 × 250 mm,
10 µm; Waters) with a flow rate of 17 mL/min. The purity of all
tested compounds (> 95%) was verified by HPLC‑UV/MS. All
"
chemical structures are given in l Table 1.
Compound isolation
A crude extract was obtained from maceration of the 1200 g
dried leaf powder from D. araucarioides in methanol under
agitation and sonication at room temperature (3 × 4 L, 6 h each).
The methanolic extract was dried and dissolved in 1 L of MeOH
80% to be successively extracted by C6H12 (3 × 1 L) and CH2Cl2
(3 × 1 L). The methylene chloride fraction was reduced to 1 L and
washed with water (2 × 1 L) to obtain the total biflavonoid extract
(20 g). This extract was then subjected to silica gel chromatogra-
phy (63–200 µm; 5 × 60 cm; Merck) eluted with a step gradient of
CH2Cl2/MeOH (90:10; 75:25 and 0:100) to obtain 10 fractions
(F1–F10). F3 (300 mg) was then fractionated by Sephadex LH20
chromatography (2.5 × 40 cm; Sigma-Aldrich) with CH2Cl2/
MeOH 3:1 to obtain 5 fractions (F3.1–F3.5). F3.3 (40 mg) was fi-
nally separated by preparative HPLC on an RP-18 column eluted
with an isocratic mix of TFA(0.5%)/MeOH 22:78 to obtain 9
(14.9 mg) and 10 (3.7 mg). F5 (1.8 g) was fractionated by silica
gel chromatography (63–200 µm; 2.5 × 30 cm; Merck) with a step
gradient of CH2Cl2/MeOH (92:8; 75:25 and 0:100) to obtain 8
The SAR study of biflavonoids and related flavonoid monomers
on the DENV‑NS5 RdRp confirms that the biflavonoid skeleton is
a promising template for the design of an antidengue compound.
Their antidengue potential is modulated by the biflavonoid skel-
eton and by the number and position of methylation groups. We
also correlated the modulation of antiviral potential with the
Coulerie P et al. Structure-Activity Relationship Study… Planta Med 2013; 79: 1313–1318