Baldini et al.
were performed using the WinGX 1.64 program.22 The structure
for all compounds was solved by direct methods using SIR9223 for
ligand 1 and SIR9724 for the other compounds. Successive Fourier
syntheses allowed the assignment of the atoms to the electron
density peaks.
(ꢀA - ꢀF) vs [DNA] and is expressed as M-1. The above-mentioned
equation, originally used to calculate the binding constants for
hydrophobic derivatives, is now broadly used to investigate a wide
variety of metal complexes containing phenanthroline and its
derivatives and is usually adopted to obtain binding constants values
from metal complexes with different ligands.14,32,33 Fixed amounts
of the ligands and of the complexes were dissolved in CH3OH
because the high solubility of the compounds in this solvent allows
one to prepare concentrated solutions and therefore to utilize
reduced volumes (5 µL) for titrations. It was also verified that the
CH3OH percentage (0.7%) added to the DNA solution did not
interfere with the nucleic acid; in fact the 260 nm absorption band
is not subject to modifications in intensity and position. Concen-
trated solutions of NaCl, Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) buffer, and DNA were
prepared. Calculated amounts of the above-mentioned stock solu-
tions were brought to final concentration values of 50 mM NaCl,
5 mM Tris-HCl, and increasing amounts of DNA over a range of
DNA concentrations from 10-5 to 10-3 M and were added to the
5 µL solution of the considered compound to maintain the final
volume of the solutions fixed at 700 µL. The compounds were
titrated at room temperature. The changes in absorbance of DNA
of an intra ligand (IL) band upon each addition were monitored at
the maximum wavelengths 284, 281, 288, 290, 290, and 320 nm
for 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, and 13, respectively. For compound 10 the titration
was monitored also at 629 nm, where the metal d-d transition was
observed. The titrations were carried out for a bp/mol ratio r in the
range 0.01-8. Melting measurements were carried out in the above-
mentioned solutions. DNA (45 µM) was then treated with our
compounds at a mol/bp ratio of r ) 0.01, and each sample was
incubated for 24 h at room temperature. Samples were continuously
heated with 1° min-1 rate of temperature increase while monitoring
the absorbance change at 260 nm. The investigated interval of
temperature ranged from 50 to 90 °C. Upon reaching 90 °C, samples
were cooled back to 50 °C to allow the renaturation process. Values
for the melting temperature (Tm) and for the melting interval (∆T)
were determined according to the reported procedures.34 Differential
melting curves were obtained by numerical differentiation of
experimental melting curves.
For compounds 1, 3, and 9 refinements were carried out by full-
matrix least-squares cycles (SHELXL-9725). Anisotropic thermal
parameters were used for non-hydrogen atoms except in ligand 3
for the carbon atoms of the allyl substituent on the aminic nitrogen
which present a certain degree of disorder and in complex 9 for a
crystallization water molecule O3W that is distributed on two
positions (O3W1 and O3W2). For ligand 1 the hydrogen atoms
were located on a difference map, except those of the water
molecules O5 and O5A, which lie on a symmetry center, and those
of the carboxylic groups. In compound 3 all hydrogen atoms of
the aliphatic chain, except those of disordered allyl group, are placed
in calculated positions. Only the hydrogen atoms of methylene
carbon C7 and those of two hydroxylic oxygen were located on a
difference map and refined. In complex 9 only the hydrogen atoms
of coordinated water molecule were located on a difference map
and isotropically refined. All ligand hydrogen atoms were placed
in calculated positions and not refined.
Analytical expressions of neutral atom scattering factors were
employed according to ref 26. Molecular geometry calculations
were performed using the PARST27 computer program and the
structure drawings obtained with the ORTEPIII28 and PLATON29
programs.
DNA Interaction Studies. DNA samples were dissolved in
aqueous solution 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.2. A solution of
CT-DNA (ca. 10-5 M in base pair, [bp]) was prepared, and in this
buffer it gave a UV absorbance ratio at 260 and 280 nm (A260
/
A280) of ca. 1.8, indicating that the CT-DNA was sufficiently protein
free. The concentration of the nucleic acid solutions was determined
by UV absorbance at 260 nm after 1:100 dilution. The extinction
coefficient ꢀ260 was taken as 13 100 M-1 cm-1 as reported in the
literature.30 Stock solutions were stored at 4 °C and used after no
more than 4 days. Binding constants for the interaction of the
compounds with the nucleic acid were determined as already
described.31 The intrinsic binding constant Kb for the interaction
of the compounds with CT-DNA has been calculated by an
Nuclease Activity: Materials and Method. The DNA cleavage
was carried out on double stranded plasmid DNA pBR 322 by
electrophoresis. Buffers were prepared using sterile distilled water.
Solutions composed by 1.6 µL of plasmid (40 µg/mL), 4 µL of
studied compound dissolved in DMSO (0.1 mM), and 8.4 µL Tris
buffer solution (10 mM) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. This was
followed by addition of gel loading solution, and each sample was
loaded directly into different wells on a 1.5% agarose gel for
analysis by electrophoresis at 75 V for 3 h. The gel was stained
with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV light in a
transilluminator.
absorption spectral titration data using the equation 1/∆ꢀap
)
1/(∆ꢀKbD) + 1/∆ꢀ, where ∆ꢀap ) |ꢀA - ꢀF|, ∆ꢀ ) |ꢀB - ꢀF|, D )
[DNA], and ꢀA , ꢀB, and ꢀF are respectively the apparent, bound,
and free extinctions coefficient of the compound. Kb is given by
the ratio of the slope to intercept when it is reported in plot [DNA]/
(22) Farrugia, L. J. WinGX 1.64. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, A 32, 837-
838.
(23) Altomare, A.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A. SIR 92.
J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 343-350.
(24) Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo,
C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A. G. G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna, R. SIR
97. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 115-122.
(25) Sheldrick, G. SHELXL 97 A Program for Structure Refinement;
University of Goettingen: Goettingen, Germany, 1997.
(26) International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, 4th ed.; Kynoch Press:
Birmingham, U.K., 1974.
(27) Nardelli, M. PARST95. An update to PARST: a system of Fortran
routines for calculating molecular structure parameters from the results
of crystal structure analyses. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1995, 28, 659.
(28) Johnson, C. K.; Burnett, M. N. ORTEPIII; Report ORNL-6895; Oak
Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, 1996.
(29) Spek, A. L. PLATON. A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht
University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.
Biological Data: Materials and Methods. The compounds were
evaluated for their possible biological activity in DMSO solutions.
Different concentration ranges for each of the compounds had to
be used because they present different degrees of solubility. At the
same time for each experiment the biological effect of DMSO, used
as a blank, was determined for each concentration.
Human leukemic cell line U937 from a patient with histiocytic
lymphoma has been used. This line was grown in RPMI-1640
(32) Liu, J.; Zhang, T.; Lu, T.; Qu, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, L. J. Inorg.
Biochem. 2002, 91, 269-276.
(33) Mudasir; Yoshioka, N.; Inoue, H. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1999, 77, 239-
247.
(34) Messori, L.; Casini, A.; Vullo, D.; Haroutiunian, S. G.; Dalian, E. B.;
Orioli, P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 303, 283-286.
(30) Reichmann, M. E.; Rice, S. A.; Thomas, C. A.; Doty, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1954, 76, 3047-3051.
(31) Wolfe, A.; Shimer, G. H., Jr.; Meehan, T. Biochem. 1987, 26, 6392-
6396.
7174 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 22, 2004