ORGANIC
LETTERS
2004
Vol. 6, No. 26
4801-4803
Modular Synthesis of Pantetheine and
Phosphopantetheine
Alexander L. Mandel, James J. La Clair, and Michael D. Burkart*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UniVersity of California-San Diego,
9500 Gilman DriVe, La Jolla, California 92093-0358
Received June 17, 2004
ABSTRACT
D
-Pantetheine and
(M1 M3) in 9 and 10 steps, respectively. These routes provide access to analogues of coenzyme A containing modified cystamines,
and pantoic acid residues. All three modules were joined using conventional methods of peptide synthesis. The chiral component, M3, was
derived from -pantolactone.
D
-phosphopantetheine, precursors to coenzyme A, have been synthesized though a linear sequence from three modules
−
â-alanines,
D
Coenzyme A (CoA), one of the most utilized cofactors in
Nature, mediates the activation and transfer of acyl groups
in fatty acid biosynthesis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis,
primary metabolic pathways, and regulatory processes.1-4
CoA plays an important role in cellular development, aging,
and cancer.5 Studies directed at the biosynthesis and process-
ing of CoA remain vital to the understanding of metabolic
disease.
CoA can be dissected into four modules as outlined in
Figure 1. The first module, cystamine (M1), presents a
terminal thiol that serves as the linkage point for acyl
transport. The cystamine moiety is connected via an amide
linkage to â-alanine (M2) that is further joined through an
amide bond to pantoic acid (M3). In CoA, pantetheine, M1-
M3, is joined to a 3′-adenosyl phosphate (M4) through a
5′-pyrophosphate bridge.
The first synthesis of CoA was unveiled in 1961, through
the coupling of pantethenic acid, cystamine, and a 5′-
phosphoromorpholidate.6 Further modifications by Michelson
provided an enhanced route to M4 through addition of an
adenosine diphosphate.7 Both syntheses use pantolactone, the
highly stable product of pantethenic acid hydrolysis, to
increase versatility. However, low yields, racemization at the
R-carbon of pantolactone, and unusual side reactions have
limited the viability of schemes beginning with pantolactone.
As a result, derivatives varying at the â-alanine moiety have
generally been avoided,4 and the â-alanine (M2) and pantoic
acid (M3) modules are installed from pantothenate. Here we
describe a modular route that permits individual derivatiza-
tion at each module (Figure 1).
While pantolactone (4) can be coupled directly onto
â-alanine to afford the necessary pantethenic acid analogue,
such strategies depend solely on the nucleophilicity of the
â-alaninylamine. Several disadvantages such as adverse
effects from protecting groups and low-yielding reactions
discourage variations that must be installed in this early stage
(1) Dewick, P. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach;
Wiley: West Sussex, England, 2001; Chapter 1.
(2) Engel, C.; Wierenga, R Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 6, 790-797.
(3) Knudsen, J.; Jensen, M. V.; Hansen, J. K.; Faergeman, N. J.;
Neergaard, T. B. F.; Gaigg B. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1999, 192, 95-103.
(4) Mishra, P. K.; Drueckhammer, D. G. Chem ReV. 2000, 100, 3283-
3309.
(6) Moffatt, J. G.; Khorana, H. G. J. Am. Chem.. Soc. 1961, 83, 663-
675.
(7) Michelson, A. M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1964, 93, 71-77.
(5) Brownell, J. E.; Allis, C. D. Curr. Opin. Gene. DeV. 1996, 6, 176-
184.
10.1021/ol048853+ CCC: $27.50
© 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/25/2004