M. D. Chordia et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1563–1566
1565
(15), 29 (3.1)%, respectively. These compounds are not
yet tested for AE activities against other receptor types
such as adrenergic and muscarinic. Further studies are
progressing in that direction will be reported in due
course.
2-Aminothiazolium salts are a new class of allosteric
enhancers of A1ARs distinct from the 2-amino-3-aroyl
thiophenes. Some of these compounds are more potent
than PD 81,723.
Acknowledgement
Figure 3. Typical dose–response curves.
Supported by grant number RO1-HL56111 from the
National Institutes of Health.
An established synthesis gave new thiazolium salts 4a,
5a–b, 6a–c, 9, 10, 11, and 12 for this investigation. The
new compounds have simple structures, contain a vari-
ety of functional groups, and can be easily transformed
into a variety of analogues. The only structural feature
that these 2-amino thiazolium salts share with PD
81,723 is a five-membered aromatic ring containing sul-
fur. The 2-aminothiazolium salts lack the 3-aroyl moi-
ety thought to be important for the AE activity of
2-amino-3-aroyl thiophenes6 and yet were potent allo-
steric enhancers at the A1AR. Indeed, some were sub-
stantially more potent than PD 81,723. Examples are:
4b, 8.7 mM; 6a, 0.3mM; 6b, 4.5mM; 7a, 3.8 mM; 8, 1 .2
mM, and 12, 4.2 mM.
References and Notes
1. Poulsen, S. E.; Quinn, R. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 6,
619.
2. Stehle, J. H.; Rivkees, S. A.; Lee, J. J; Weaver, D. R.;
Deeds, J. D.; Reppert, S. M. Mol. Endocrinol. 1992, 6, 384.
3. Romano, F. D.; Dobson, J. G. Life Sci. 1996, 58, 493.
4. Fredholm, B. B.; Arslan, G.; Halldner, L.; Kull, J.; Schulte,
G.; Wasserman, W. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol.
2000, 362, 364.
5. Henis, Y. I.; Kloog, Y.; Sokolovsky, M. In The Muscarinic
Receptors; Brown, J. H., Ed.; Humana: Clifton, 1989; p 377.
6. Bruns, R. F.; Fergus, J. H. Mol. Pharmocol. 1990, 38, 939.
7. King, L. C.; Hlavacek, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72,
3722.
The structure–activity profile of the 2-aminothiazolium
salts indicates that bicyclic 2-aminothiazolium deriva-
tives have less AE activity than tricyclic salts (compare
1a–c with 2a–c). Among the tricyclic derivatives the
potency order of allosteric enhancement is 6:5:5 (2a)
ꢂ6:6:5 (2b)>6:7:5 (2c).
8. General procedure for synthesis of 2-aminothiazolium salts:
Thiourea (3–4 mmol) and iodine (1.1 mmol) were added to a
solution of ketone (1.0 mmol) in absolute ethanol (2 mL). The
mixture was heated for 2–3 h in an open vessel on oil bath at
100 ꢃC. Heating evaporated the ethanol. The crude residue was
washed with ether (3ꢄ5 mL) and recrystallized from hot
water. Drying under reduced pressure yielded yellow to red-
brown solids. A few of these compounds in free amine form
are reported in literature and their structural characterization
was not carried out thoroughly for example compounds 1a–b,
2a–c, 3a–b, 4a, 8 and 14. 1H and 13C-spectral data for selected
compounds: Compound 4a, 5-methoxy-8H-indeno[1,2-d]thia-
zol-2-ylamine hydroiodide: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.70 (s,
2H, CH2), 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.82 (dd, J=2.4, 7.8 Hz, 1H),
7.37 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 9.5 (br s).
Compound 8, 5,6-dimethoxy-8H-indeno[1,2,-d]thiazole-2-yla-
Thus, planarity of the overall skeleton and the dihedral
angle between the thiazole ring and the aromatic ring
might be important. Exchanging the positions of nitro-
gen and sulfur as in case of derivatives 2a–b and 3a–b
has a marked effect on enhancer activity, suggesting that
the disposition of the nitrogen is important for mole-
cular recognition. Steric hindrance exerted by the
phenyl groups of 3a–b is an alternative explanation for
the difference in AE activity. An electron donor group
on the aromatic ring improves allosteric enhancer
activity (compare 2b with 4b).
1
mine hydroiodide: H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.68 (s, 2H, CH2),
3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.78 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.20 (1H, CH, ArH),
7.25 (s, 1H, ArH), 9.00 (br s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) d 33.6,
55.6, 55.8, 102.4, 109.8, 119.1, 137.8, 147.6, 148.0, 173.7.
Compound 9, 5,6,7-trimethoxy-8H-indeno[1,2-d]thiazol-2-yla-
Compounds 6a, 7a, and 8 are interesting as lead com-
pounds for additional AE’s. Although more informa-
tion is needed to define the structure–activity rules more
precisely, the discovery of AE activity in 2-aminothi-
azoles advances our understanding of these rules.
1
mine hydroiodide: H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.73 (s, 2H, CH2),
3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.81(s, 3H, OCH ), 3.93 (s, 3H, OCH3),
3
7.11 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.72 (br s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) d 34.0,
56.3, 60.6, 61.5, 106.3, 118.5, 119.2, 140.2, 141.2, 144.7, 152.7,
174.4. Compound 10, 4,5,6-trimethoxy-8H-indeno[1,2-d]thia-
zol-2-ylamine hydroiodide: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 3.73 (s,
2H, CH2), 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.81(s, 3H, OCH 3), 3.93 (s, 3H,
OCH3), 7.11 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.72 (br s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6) d
31.4, 56.1, 60.2, 60.6, 98.6, 121.2, 128.2, 128.8, 139.6, 143.1,
149.5, 153.2, 173.8. Compound 11, 6-methyl-8H-indeno[1,2-
d]thiazol-2-ylamine hydroiodide: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) d 2.36 (s,
3H), 3.73 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.07 (dd, 1H, J=1.5, 7.8 Hz, ArH), 7.38
(d, 1H, J=1.5 Hz, 7.42 (d, 1H, J=7.8 Hz, ArH), 9.03 (br s);
A few of these compounds were tested for their subtype
selectivities within adenosine receptors subfamily and
were found to be more potent and highly efficacious on
A1 compared to their A2A and A3 AR counterparts. For
example compounds 4b, 6a, 7a, and 8 displayed AE
maximal scores (pEC50 value) at A1 94 (8.7), 80 (0.3), 92
(3.8), 99 (1.2)% as against at A2A 18 (30), 19 (1.8), 24
(23), 36 (12)% and at A3 8 (not determined), 22 (1.8), 30