542
M. Guerrero et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 537–542
Unfortunately, hydroxymethyl (22h) and amino (22i) analogs were
found inactive. These data suggest that the nitro group may not be
involved in a hydrogen bond interaction but rather may be direct-
ing the ether spacer into the active conformation. In order to inves-
tigate this hypothesis, the methyl (22j), ethyl (22k) and phenyl
(22q) analogs were synthesized. These analogs were found less
active than the hit showing a decrement in potency correlated with
the size of the substituent. Finally, we explored the possibility of
installing halogen atoms to substitute the nitro group. Remarkably,
the 2-bromo 22l (CYM50199) and the 2,6-dibromo 22n
(CYM50179) analogs were found to be threefold more potent than
the hit. Restricting the rotation of the spacer by attaching a methyl
group at position 4 of 22l led to the inactive compound 22s. Re-
moval of the bromine from position 6 (22m) led to significant loss
of potency as previously observed with the nitro analog 22a. The 2-
bromo-6-fluoro analog 22o was only fourfold less potent than 22l,
but sixfold more potent than 22m, suggesting that substituents at
position 6 modulate the potency. The 2-iodo-6-methyl analog 22p
(CYM50138) was equipotent to the 2-bromo analog 22l. Based on
the acquired information, the SAR at position 6 was further investi-
gated. Substituting the methyl group with a phenyl ring (22r) led to
a substantial loss of potency. Interestingly, hydroxymethyl 22t was
only fourfold less potent whereas aldehyde 22u was 38-fold less ac-
tive than 22p, suggesting that a hydrogen-bond donor rather than
an acceptor may be better tolerated in this region of the molecule.
Interestingly, in the presence of chlorine at position 2 comparable
activities were found for both the alcohol 22v and aldehyde 22w
derivatives, which were respectively fivefold less and slightly more
active than the 2-iodine counterparts (22t, 22u). In line with the
hypothesis that a hydrogen-bond acceptor is not well accepted in
this region, the methyl ether 22x was inactive. Successively, we ex-
plored the influence of alkenyl substituents in this region. The eth-
ylene analog 22y showed modest potency, while its dimethylated
analog 22z was inactive suggesting that bulky substituents are det-
rimental for the potency. Taking into account that halogens directly
attached at position 6 of the pyridine ring (22d, 22n, 22o) were well
tolerated probably due to the formation of a dipole, we prepared the
fluoromethyl derivative 22aa. Remarkably, 22aa (CYM50260) was
found 3.5-fold more potent than the hit compound and was equipo-
tent to the dibromine analog 22n. These data suggest that substit-
uents at positions 2 and 6 are essential to improve the potency.
The position 2 tolerated nitro and halogen groups while small lipo-
philic or dipole-inducing groups were the most suitable substitu-
ents at position 6.
and exquisitely selective S1P4-R agonists 22l, 22n, 22p, 22aa
(CYM50199, CYM50179, CYM50138, CYM50260). Noteworthy, the
studies herein reported provide novel pharmacological tools to
decipher the biological function and assess the therapeutic utility
of the S1P4–R. Further studies of our research program will be com-
municated in due curse.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health
Molecular Library Probe Production Center Grant U54 MH084512
(E.R., H.R.) and AI074564 (M.O., H.R.). We thank Mark Southern for
data management with Pub Chem, Pierre Baillargeon and Lina DeL-
uca (Lead Identification Division, Scripps Florida) for compound
management.
References and notes
1. Sanchez, T.; Hla, T. J. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 92, 913.
2. Schwab, S. R.; Cyster, J. G. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 1295.
3. Kono, M.; Allende, M. L.; Proia, R. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 781, 435.
4. Marsolais, D.; Rosen, H. Nat. Rev. Drug. Disc. 2009, 8, 297.
5. Fyrst, H.; Saba, J. D. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 489.
6. Spiegel, S.; Milstien, S. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 4, 397.
7. Hannun, Y. A.; Obeid, L. M. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 9, 139.
8. Rivera, J.; Proia, R. L.; Olivera, A. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 753.
9. Gräler, M. H.; Bernhardt, G.; Lipp, M. Genomics 1998, 53, 164.
10. Toman, R. E.; Spiegel, S. Neurochem. Res. 2002, 27, 619.
11. Kohno, T.; Matsuyuki, H.; Inagaki, Y.; Igarashi, Y. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 685.
12. Goetzl, E. J.; Rosen, H. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 1531.
13. Idzko, M.; Hammad, H.; van Nimwegen, M.; Kool, M.; Muller, T.; Soullie, T.;
Willart, M. A.; Hijdra, D.; Hoogsteden, H. C.; Lambrecht, B. N. J. Clin. Invest.
2006, 116, 2935.
14. Matsuyuki, H.; Maeda, Y.; Yano, K.; Sugahara, K.; Chiba, K.; Kohno, T.; Igarashi,
Y. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2006, 3, 429.
15. Maeda, Y.; Matsuyuki, H.; Shimano, K.; Kataoka, H.; Sugahara, K.; Kenji Chiba,
K. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 3437.
16. Marsolais, D.; Hahm, B.; Edelmann, K. H.; Walsh, K. B.; Guerrero, M.; Hatta, Y.;
Kawaoka, Y.; Roberts, E.; Oldstone, M. B.; Rosen, H. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 74,
896.
17. Wang, W.; Graeler, M. H.; Goetzl, E. J. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1731.
18. Schulze, T.; Golfier, S.; Tabeling, C.; Räbel, K.; Gräler, M. H.; Witzenrath, M.;
19. Golfier, S.; Kondo, S.; Schulze, T.; Takeuchi, T.; Vassileva, G.; Achtman, A. H.;
Gräler, M. H.; Abbondanzo, S. J.; Wiekowski, M.; Kremmer, E.; Endo, Y.; Lira, S.
A.; Bacon, K. B.; Lipp, M. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 4701.
20. Urbano, M.; Guerrero, M.; Velaparthi, S.; Crisp, M.; Chase, P.; Hodder, P.;
Schaeffer, M.; Brown, S.; Rosen, H.; Roberts, E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011.
21. Fontenas, C.; Bejan, E.; Aït Haddou, H.; Balavoine, G. G. A. Synth. Commun. 1995,
25, 629.
22. Smith, G. F. Prog. Med. Chem. 2011, 50, 1.
23. The biological assays were performed using Tango S1P4-BLA U2OS cells
A set of the most active compounds was selected for selectivity
assays against S1P1–3,5-R subtypes (Table 4). Remarkably, all tested
compounds displayed exquisite selectivity against the other S1P-R
family members.
In summary, we have reported the discovery, design and
synthesis of novel small molecule S1P4-R agonists based on a
3-(2-(phenoxy)ethoxy)-6-alkyl-2-nitropyridine chemotype dis-
tinct from previously reported S1P4-R modulators. Systematic SAR
analysis of the original MLSMR hit 2, a selective but moderately
potent S1P4-R agonist, led to the development of novel potent
containing the human Endothelial Differentiation Gene
6 (EDG6; S1P4-R)
linked to a GAL4-VP16 transcription factor via a TEV protease site. The cells
also express a beta-arrestin/TEV protease fusion protein and a beta-lactamase
(BLA) reporter gene under the control of a UAS response element. Stimulation
of the S1P4-R by agonist causes migration of the fusion protein to the GPCR,
and through proteolysis liberates GAL4-VP16 from the receptor. The liberated
VP16-GAL4 migrates to the nucleus, where it induces transcription of the BLA
gene. BLA expression is monitored by measuring fluorescence resonance
energy transfer (FRET) of
a cleavable, fluorogenic, cell-permeable BLA
substrate. As designed, test compounds that act as S1P4-R agonists will
activate S1P4-R and increase well FRET. Compounds were tested in triplicate at
a final nominal concentration of 25 lM.