complex (Figure 2, bottom). Thus, the Cu-N optimized
distance has average values of 2.179 Å (c) and 2.188 Å (d),
while the Cu-Cl-optimized distances are 2.317 Å (c) and
2.260 Å (d).
We accordingly envisioned that tris(triazolyl)methanol 3
(Figure 3), constructed in turn through a “click” approach,
Figure 1. Polydentate N ligands for CuAAC.
Scorpionate ligands based on tris(pyrazolyl)borate moieties
(Figure 2, top) form very stable metal complexes due to the
Figure 3. Structural features of 3·CuCl.
could be an outstanding ligand for CuAAC. In effect, besides
the presumed stability of its Cu(I) complex, the molecule
presents two well-differentiated faces with complementary
hydrophobic and hydrophilic characters that make it ideal
for work on water, a most usual condition for CuAAC.12 In
addition, due to its modular construction,13 3 could be readily
fine-tuned for specific applications by simply changing the
nature of the azido compound employed for its synthesis.
On the other hand, the hydroxyl group placed on the
hydrophilic hemisphere of the molecule can also serve as
an anchor for supporting 3 onto polymeric materials.14
The synthesis of 3 was planned through the intermediacy
of tris(alkynyl)carbinol 415 which, in turn, was readily
prepared by addition of trimethylsilylacetylide to ethyl
chloroformate (Scheme 1).
Figure 2. Top: Schematic representation of metal complexes of a
tris(pyrazolyl)borate (a) and of a tris(triazolyl)methane (b). Bottom:
DFT (B3LYP/LANL2DZ)-optimized geometries of the CuCl
complexes of a tris(pyrazolyl)borate (c) and of tris(triazolyl)methane
(d).
(11) (a) D´ıaz-Requejo, M. M.; Belderrain, T. R.; Nicasio, M. C.;
Trofimenko, S.; Pe´rez, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 896. (b) D´ıaz-
Requejo, M. M.; Pe´rez, P. J. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 3379.
(12) (a) Narayan, S.; Muldoon, J.; Finn, M. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Kolb,
H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3157. (b) Hayashi,
Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8103.
establishment of chelated, cage structures involving the
formation of six-membered rings.10 These complexes have
found ample application as catalysts in a variety of relevant
processes and, most notably, in C-H bond activation
methods.11 We wondered whether the analogous tris(triaz-
olyl)methane complexes would depict similar stability and,
in particular, if the corresponding Cu(I) complexes would
consequently perform as highly efficient catalysts in CuAAC.
In fact, DFT theoretical calculations (B3LYP/LANL2DZ)
performed on Cu(I) complexes of both types of structures
revealed essentially identical structures for both types of
(13) For modular approaches to catalytic ligands from our research, see:
(a) Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Perica`s, M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 4970. (b) Puigjaner, C.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Perica`s,
M. A.; Riera, A. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7902. (c) Garc´ıa-Delgado, N.;
Reddy, K. S.; Sola`, L.; Riera, A.; Perica`s, M. A.; Verdaguer, X. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 7426. (d) Rodr´ıguez-Escrich, S.; Reddy, K. S.; Jimeno,
C.; Colet, G.; Rodr´ıguez-Escrich, C.; Sola`, L.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Perica`s,
M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5340. (e) Rodr´ıguez-Escrich, S.; Sola`, L.;
Jimeno, C.; Rodr´ıguez-Escrich, C.; Perica`s, M. A. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 2250.
(14) For examples on the use of click chemistry as a supporting strategy
for ligands and catalysts, see: (a) Font, D.; Jimeno, C.; Perica`s, M. A. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 3895. (b) Bastero, A.; Font, D.; Perica`s, M. A. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 2460. (c) Alza, E.; Cambeiro, X. C.; Jimeno, C.; Perica`s, M. A.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3717. (d) Font, D.; Bastero, A.; Sayalero, S.; Jimeno,
C.; Perica`s, M. A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1943. (e) Bastero, A.; Font, D.; Perica`s,
M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2460. (f) Font, D.; Sayalero, S.; Bastero,
A.; Jimeno, C.; Perica`s, M. A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 337. (g) Popa, D.;
Marcos, R.; Sayalero, S.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Perica`s, M. A. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 1539.
(7) Donnelly, P. S.; Zanatta, S. D.; Zammit, S. C.; White, J. M.;
Williams, S. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2459.
(8) Candelon, N.; Laste´coue`res, D.; Diallo, A. K.; Ruiz Aranzaes, J.;
Astruc, D.; Vincent, J.-M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 741.
(9) (a) D´ıez-Gonza´lez, S.; Correa, A.; Cavallo, L.; Nolan, S. P.
Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 7558. (b) D´ıez-Gonza´lez, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9013.
(10) (a) Trofimenko, S.; Calabrese, J. C.; Domaille, P. J.; Thompson,
J. S. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 1091. (b) Trofimenko, S. Scorpionates, The
Coordination Chemistry of Polypyrazolylborate Ligands; Imperial Chemistry
Press: London, 1999.
(15) Alberts, A. H.; Wynberg, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988,
748.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 20, 2009
4681