Communications
[1-NNPPh2Me][OTf]:
A
solution of Na[1-N2] (600 mg,
that is, oxidation of [Mo{N(tBu)Ar}3] with AgOTf or [Cp2Fe]-
0.888 mmol) in THF (6 mL) was combined with a solution of
Ph2PCl (159 mL, 0.888 mmol) in THF (2 mL) at À358C. After the
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min, THF solvent was removed in
vacuo. Then pentane (10 mL) was added, the mixture was filtered
through Celite, and pentane was removed in vacuo to give a crude
material containing 1-NNPPh2 (387 mg). To a pentane solution of the
crude product, MeOTf (55 mL, 0.49 mmol) was added, and the
mixture was stirred for 5 min. Yellow powder was immediately
generated. The liquid was decanted off, and the yellow powder was
washed with pentane twice, and dried in vacuo. Recrystallization from
CH2Cl2/Et2O/n-hexane gave yellow-orange microcrystals of [1-
NNPPh2Me][OTf] (363 mg, 41% yield from Na[1-N2]). 1H NMR
(C6D6): d = 8.19 (dd, J = 13.1 Hz, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.32 (m, 4H), 7.15
(overlap with solvent residuals, 2H), 6.62 (s, 3H), 5.77 (brs, 6H), 3.03
(d, J = 13.2 Hz, 3H), 1.97 (s, 18H), 1.16 ppm (s, 27H); 31P{1H} NMR
[OTf]. The reaction of [1-NNPPh2Me][OTf] with [nBu4N]
[CN] in C6D6 upon mixing afforded [(NC)Mo{N(tBu)Ar}3] (1-
CN)[11] and PPh2Me + N2 almost quantitatively (Scheme 1).
Treatment of [1-NNPPh2Me][OTf] with cobaltocene
(1 equiv) in C6D6 gave [Mo{N(tBu)Ar}3] (1) and PPh2Me +
N2 again in almost quantitative yield. Thus, as expected, the
fragile NNPPh2Me ligand in [1-NNPPh2Me][OTf] is subject to
facile fragmentation to its PPh2Me and N2 components under
exposure to some chemical or physical stimuli (Scheme 1).
To gain insight into the electronic structure of [1-
NNPPh2Me][OTf] we performed density functional calcula-
tions (ADF 2004.01, BP86/TZ2P) on the model compounds
[(H2PNN)Mo(NH2)3] (1’-NNPH2) and [(H3PNN)Mo(NH2)3]+
([1’-NNPH3]+).[12] A topological charge density analysis[13] was
carried out with aid of the Xaim program,[14] based on the
calculated charge density distributions. The electronic charge
(C6D6): d = 20.0 ppm (s); FTIR (C6D6, KBr): n˜NN = 1586 cmÀ1
Elemental analysis calcd C 59.93, H 6.74, N 6.99; found: C 59.96, H
6.78, 6.92. Crystallographic data for [1-NNPPh2Me][OTf]:
.
N
C50H67N5PSO3F3Mo, M = 1002.07, space group P21/n, a =
21.3981(17), b = 10.8084(8), c = 22.1557(17) ꢀ; b = 95.1550(10)8, V=
5103.4(7) ꢀ3, Z = 4, F(000) = 2104, 1cald = 1.304 gcmÀ3, 577 parame-
ters refined with 11891 reflections with I > 2s(I) to R = 0.0505.
CCDC-258978 (1-NNPPh2), CCDC-258979 ([1-NNPPh2Me]-
[OTf]) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this
paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge
cif.
1-OTf: Mo(N[tBu]Ar)3 (1, 273 mg, 0.437 mmol) was dissolved in
pentane (10 mL), and AgOTf (112 mg, 0.437 mmol) was added at
room temperature. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 4 h. The
color of the mixture changed to deep purple. Then the mixture was
filtered through Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated. Crystal-
lization from pentane at À358C gave deep purple microcrystals of 1-
OTf (43.8 mg, 13% yield). 1H NMR (C6D6): d = 6.06 (s, 3H), 5.94
(brs, 6H), 2.11 (s, 27H), 1.86 ppm (s, 18H); Elemental analysis calcd
C 57.43, H 7.03, N 5.43; found: C 57.59, H 7.12, N 5.38. An NMR
monitoring experiment of the reaction of [Mo{N(tBu)Ar}3] with
[Cp2Fe][OTf] (1 equiv) in C6D6/[D8]THF (v/v = 9/1) showed quanti-
tative formation of 1-OTf.
À
density value found at the (3,À1) critical point (1b) of the N
N bond in [1’-NNPH3]+ (0.4016 ea0À3) was lower than that in
1’-NNPH2 (0.4586 ea0À3). The calculated bond order (n) is 1.6
for [1’-NNPH3]+ (cf. 1.9 for 1’-NNPH2); this estimation is
derived from Baderꢁs linear correlation between 1b values and
[13]
À
À
N N bond order (n). These data indicate that the N N
bond in the cationic [Mo](NNPR3) complex is intermediate
between a single and a double bond.[15] The information
obtained from computational analysis, combined with the
experimental structural data, reveal that the bonding in cation
[1-NNPPh2Me]+ is characterized by resonance between the
hydrazido(2-) form A and the diazenido form B (Scheme 1).
A similar pair of resonance structures was proposed in
connection with the particular diazenylphosphonium salt [4-
À
Et2NC6H4NNPPh3][BF4] and its short P N bond length
(l.648 ꢀ).[16]
In summary, this work demonstrates that the remarkable
ligand NNPR3 composed of dinitrogen and methyldiphenyl-
phosphane can be obtained and is understandable in the
context of a cationic molybdenum system. Because one-
electron reduction of cation [1-NNPPh2Me]+ leads to frag-
mentation to the three known molecules PPh2Me, N2, and
Received: December 24, 2004
Published online: March 22, 2005
Keywords: diazenido ligands · dinitrogen ligands ·
[Mo{N(tBu)Ar} ] (1), it may be said that this remarkable
.
3
molybdenum · N,P ligands · phosphine ligands
three-component system is bound together entirely by the
absence of a single electron.
[1] The abbreviation R which appears in some general formulas in
this paper is not necessarily identical to the R = tBu as in 1 and
complexes derived therefrom.
= À =
Experimental Section
[2] Selected examples; a) H2C N N PPh3: G. Wittig, W. Haag,
=
1-NNPPh2: A solution of Na[1-N2] (500 mg, 0.740 mmol) in THF
(6 mL) was combined with a solution of Ph2PCl (133 mL, 0.740 mmol)
in THF (2 mL) at À358C. After the reaction mixture had been stirred
for 5 min, THF solvent was removed in vacuo. Then pentane (10 mL)
was added, the mixture was filtered through Celite, and pentane was
removed in vacuo. Repeated recrystallization from pentane gave
Chem. Ber. 1955, 88, 1654; b) [Ph-N N-PPh3][BF4]: R. Yama-
shita, K. Kikukawa, F. Wada, T. Matsuda, J. Organomet. Chem.
1980, 201, 463; c) CN N PPh3: B. Weinberger, W. P. Fehlham-
mer, Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 42; d) [NNNPPh3][SbCl6]: W. Buder,
A. Schmidt, Chem. Ber. 1973, 106, 3812.
À =
[3] It is known that some diazo compounds are stabilized by
coordination to a d2 metal center. For stabilization of terminal
organoazido (NNNR) ligands; a) G. Proulx, R. G. Bergman, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6382; b) M. G. Fickes, W. M. Davis,
C. C. Cummins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6384; c) G. Proulx,
R. G. Bergman, Organometallics 1996, 15, 684; d) G. Guillemot,
E. Solari, C. Floriani, C. Rizzoli, Organometallics 2001, 20, 607.
For stabilization of diazoalkane (NNCR2) ligands; e) M. Darti-
guenave, M. J. Menu, E. Deydier, Y. Dartiguenave, H. Siebald,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178–180, 623, and references therein.
1
analytically pure 1-NNPPh2 (62.8 mg, 10% yield). H NMR (C6D6):
d = 8.01 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.25 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 4H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
2H), 6.64 (s, 3H), 6.03 (s, 6H), 2.04 (s, 18H), 1.53 (s, 27H); 31P{1H}
NMR (C6D6): d = 67.3 (s); Elemental analysis calcd C 68.80, H 7.70, N
8.36: found: C 69.03, H 8.19, N 7.96. Crystallographic data for 1-
NNPPh2: C48H64N5PMo, M = 837.97, space group P21/c, a =
22.6095(19), b = 10.5661(9), c = 19.4732(16) ꢀ; b = 94.183(2)8, V=
4639.6(7) ꢀ3, Z = 4, F(000) = 1776, 1calcd = 1.20 gcmÀ3, 542 parameters
refined with 7280 reflections with I > 2s(I) to R = 0.0516.
2562
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2560 –2563