regarded as an absorption-inhibition process1a-d,h in which
AFGPs bind tightly to the surface of an existing ice crystal.
This binding ultimately inhibits the addition of other water
molecules to the ice lattice resulting in a localized freezing
point depression. The temperature difference between the
melting and freezing point is referred to as thermal hysteresis
(TH). While the protein-ice interactions of native AFGP
have not been definitively identified, hydrogen-bonding
interactions involving hydrophilic hydroxyl groups on the
disaccharide2 and possible hydrophobic interactions with the
â-methyl group of the threonine residue are thought to be
essential interations.3 Furthermore, recent studies have identi-
fied the N-acetyl group, R-configuration of glycoside, and
â-methyl group on the threonyl residue as important for
activity.4
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Building Blocks 5, 6, 8, and 10
for OCM
AFGPs are also potent recrystallization inhibitors. While
the mechanism by which this re-organization of ice crystals
is not known, this property has many potential applications
in cryomedicine and the prevention of cellular damage during
freezing and thawing cycles.1i
Unfortunately, two factors have precluded the com-
mercialization of native AFGP for medical and industrial
applications. These are the limited bioavailability and the
inherent instability of the C-O glycosidic bond. Conse-
quently, rationally designed carbon-linked or C-linked AFGP
analogues are very attractive.5 Toward this end, we have
previously reported on the preparation of C-linked AFGP
analogues bearing an amide bond in the side chain that
demonstrated antifreeze protein-specific activity.6 In this
paper, we report the synthesis of a series of “simplified”
C-linked AFGP analogues (general structure 2) lacking the
amide bond and correlate the distance between the carbo-
hydrate moiety and peptide backbone to antifreeze protein-
specific activity. Many of the structural features in the first-
generation analogues have been incorporated into AFGP
analogues 2a-c. For instance, the native disaccharide has
been truncated and replaced by a single galactose residue
and the alanine residues replaced with glycines.
Preparation of the requisite building blocks for olefin cross-
metathesis are outlined in Scheme 1. C-Allylated galactose
pentaacetate 5 was prepared via a photochemical-mediated
allylation in 90% yield.9a C-Glycoside 8 was obtained by
reducing 5 with borane followed by PCC oxidation and
Wittig olefination with methyl triphenyl phosphonium
bromide.9b,c C-(1-Propenyl) glycoside 6, a key intermediate
in the preparation of AFGP analogue 2a, was generated via
a palladium-mediated isomerization of 5.
Vinyl glycine derivative 10 was obtained in 34% yield
from the orthogonally protected glutamic acid derivative 9
by oxidative decarboxylation.10 With the requisite building
blocks in hand, olefin cross-metathesis of 10 with 5, 6, and
8 was conducted using the second- generation Grubbs
catalyst (Scheme 2). As anticipated, building blocks 12 and
Recently, several methodologies have been developed to
prepare C-glycosyl amino acids including olefin cross
metathesis (OCM) and catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation.7
The former approach is amenable to preparing analogues
such as 2 as it requires the readily available vinyl glycine
and C-alkenyl galactose derivatives as starting mate-
rials.8
Scheme 2. Preparation of C-Linked Building Blocks 14 and 15
(2) (a) Chao, H.; Houston, M. E.; Hodges, R. S.; Kay, C. M.; Sykes, B.
D.; Loewen, M. C.; Davies, P. L.; So¨nnichsen, F. D. Biochemistry 1997,
36, 14652-14660. (b) Haymet, A. D. J.; Ward, L. G.; Harding, M. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 941-948. (c) Knight, C. A.; Driggers, E.;
DeVries, A. L. Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 8-18.
(3) Lavalle, P.; DeVries, A. L.; Cheng, C.-C. C.; Scheuring, S.; Ramsden,
J. J. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5785-5789.
(4) Tachibana, Y.; Fletcher, G. L.; Fujitani, N.; Tsuda, S.; Monde, K.;
Nishimura, S.-I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 856-862.
(5) (a) Ravishankar, R.; Surolia, A.; Vijayan, M.; Lim, S.; Kishi, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11297-11303. (b) Wang, J.; Kovac, P.; Sinay,
P.; Gluademans, C. P. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 308, 191-193.
(6) (a) Ben, R. N.; Eniade, A. A.; Hauer, L. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1759-
1762. (b) Eniade, A. A.; Murphy, A. V.; Landreau, G.; Ben, R. N.
Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 817-823. (c) Enaide, A. A.; Purushotham,
M.; Ben, R. N.; Wang, J. B.; Horwath, K. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2003
38, 115-124.
2386
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005