should allow for general access to tetrahydrofurans 5 and 6,
respectively.
Scheme 2. Protiodesilylations of Tetrahydrofurans 11 and
14R/â by Using TBAF-Modified Literature Conditions
The established literature procedure for protiodesilylation
of unactivated C(sp3)-SiMe2R bonds (i.e., RCH2SiMe3 or
RCH2SiMe2Ph f RCH3) involves extended basic hydrolysis
(DMSO/H2O, 5-10% KOtBu, 18-crown-6, 95 °C, 2-7
days).2,5 Although tetrahydrofurans 6 can be obtained from
3 or 4 using this procedure,2 the extended reaction times and
extremely harsh conditions severely limit the potential
applications of this method, with protiodesilylation generally
failing for substrates with any reasonably complex R1 or R2
(vida infra). 2c
During the course of several ongoing studies in natural
product synthesis, it became paramount that a mild method
for accomplishing this protiodesilylation (e.g., 3 or 4 f 6)
reaction be developed. In particular, in connection with
studies on the synthesis of amphidinolide F,6 we demon-
strated that protiodesilylation of highly functionalized tet-
rahydrofurans of general structure 4 could be effected by
treatment with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) in DMF
(Scheme 1).2c We report herein a much wider range of
ylsilyl analogues explored by Landais,5d and the isolated
siloxanes investigated by Hoveyda and Stork.5e,8 Accordingly,
TBAF was added to the standard Hudrlik reaction conditions
(DMSO/H2O, 5-10% KOtBu, 18-crown-6, 95 °C) to effect
in situ desilylation of the TBS ethers present in both
substrates. Unfortunately, these reactions were highly irre-
producible, requiring reaction times from 1 day to 1 week
for complete conversion. The long reaction times necessitated
that these experiments be performed in sealed pressure tubes
(to prevent evaporation of solvent), which proved highly
inconvenient for reaction monitoring. In addition, significant
decomposition of even the relatively simple tetrahydrofuran
11 was observed.
Scheme 1. Key TBAF-Mediated Protiodesilylation of an
Amphidinolide F Precursor (7)3c
Interestingly, brief treatment of both 11 and 14R or 14â
under the TBAF-modified Hudrlik conditions led to the
generation of the sensitive but isolable silanols 15, 17R, and
17â after aqueous workup (Scheme 2).9 Both 15 and 17R/â
were competent in the further conversion to 16 and 18R/â
upon exposure to the reaction conditions. These silanol
intermediates are likely not accessible from the corresponding
trimethylsilyl derivatives explored by Hudrlik.5 This sug-
gested to us that the protiodesilylation of -SiMe2Ph groups
might occur via a different mechanistic pathway compared
to the -SiMe3 derivatives and that a cyclic silicate or
siloxane may not be a required intermediate.
Significant differences in substrate scope for the present
process compared to the -SiMe3 substrates studied by
Hudrlik quickly became evident. Tetrahydrofurans 19-2110
undergo smooth carbon-silicon bond cleavage to afford
protiodesilylated adducts 22-24 in good yields (entries 1-3,
conditions A, Table 1). Interestingly, the protiodesilylation
of 20 and 21 proceeds smoothly even though they lack a
examples of this process, which serve to define the scope of
this mild and efficient protiodesilylation reaction.
We began with a careful exploration of the original
Hudrlik-type conditions5a-c by using tetrahydrofurans 11 and
14R/â (Scheme 2).7 Initially, we anticipated that a neighbor-
ing hydroxyl group was required to activate the -SiMe2Ph
group toward protiodesilylation by analogy to the trimeth-
ylsilane substrates investigated by Hudrlik,5a-c the diphen-
(4) Jones, G. R.; Landais, Y. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7599.
(5) (a) Hudrlik, P.; Hudrlik, A.; Kulkarni, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 6809. (b) Hudrlik, P.; Holmes, P.; Hudrlik, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 6395. (c) Hudrlik, P.; Gebreselassie, P.; Tafesse, L.; Hudrlik, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3409. (d) Landais, Y.; Mahieux, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 675. (e) Stork, G.; Sofia, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 6826.
(6) Kobayashi, J.; Ishibashi, M.; Wa¨lchli, M.; Nakamura, H.; Hirata, Y.;
Sasaki, T.; Ohizumi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 490.
(7) Tetrahydrofurans 11 and 14â were prepared as summarized below.
(8) Hale, M.; Hoveyda, A. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1643.
(9) See: Murakami, M.; Suginome, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Nakamura, H.;
Andersson, P.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 115, 6487. In our hands,
silanols 17R/â show a marked propensity toward oligomerization upon
attempted isolation (see Supporting Information). These oligomeric mixtures
are competent intermediates toward further protiodesilylation.
(10) Available from the [3+2]-annulation of 12 with R-benzyloxy-
acetaldehyde under nonchelate conditions and subsequent standard trans-
formations (see Supporting Information).
2406
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005