892
FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION
genic forms of sexual dysfunction are included in the present tress criterion for most diagnostic categories. A new diagno-
classification. The fact that many dysfunctions in women are sis of noncoital sexual pain disorder was added to the cate-
not exclusively psychologically or organically based is gener- gory of sexual pain disorders and a new diagnostic category of
sexual satisfaction disorder was proposed but failed to
achieve complete consensus approval. In addition to the con-
sensus classification system, guidelines concerning clinical
end points and outcomes in female sexual dysfunction were
developed, and a list of current research topics and priorities
was proposed.
ally accepted. For example, physical findings of hypersensi-
tivity and allodynia of the vestibular margin in some cases of
dyspareunia or increased muscle tone in the perivaginal
muscles often associated with vaginismus may be associated
with strong central or psychological determinants.23 A new
typology for differentiating organic, psychogenic, mixed and
uncertain etiologies is included in the proposed subtyping.
The etiological category of “unknown” was added, which is
recommended for use when the diagnosing clinician has in-
adequate basis for etiological formulation, based on patient
history, physical examination or laboratory tests.
Thomas Bruckman and Bette Rank, American Foundation
for Urologic Disease, provided support and assistance.
APPENDIX: CLASSIFICATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL
DYSFUNCTION
Finally, there were extended discussions among panelists
about the introduction of a new diagnostic category of sexual
satisfaction disorder. It was proposed that this diagnosis be
applied when a woman is unable to achieve subjective sexual
satisfaction, despite adequate desire, arousal and orgasm. It
was noted by several panelists that this diagnosis applied to
a significant number of women who sought help for sexual
dysfunction. Complaints of this type are difficult to incorpo-
rate within the existing nosological framework. It was also
suggested that publication of a new diagnostic category
would stimulate research on the epidemiological prevalence
of the disorder as well as studies of the underlying mecha-
nisms and psychological processes. On the negative side of
the issue, several panelists noted the absence of adequate
epidemiological or clinical evidence in support of this new
category. The difficulty in defining diagnostic thresholds or
criteria for making the diagnosis was also noted. Although a
majority of panelists favored introduction of this new cate-
gory, following 2 rounds of voting and discussion the panel
failed to reach satisfactory consensus. Instead, a recommen-
dation was made to reconsider this proposal when additional
epidemiological and clinical data become available. Further
research on this topic is strongly encouraged.
Clearer specification of end points and outcomes is re-
quired for clinical trials of female sexual dysfunction. We
reached several major conclusions. Clinical end points should
be based on the consensus guidelines for definition and clas-
sification of female sexual dysfunction. For large scale clini-
cal trials patient self-report measures are generally pre-
ferred, which could include standardized questionnaires or
event log types of measures. Specific changes in sexual func-
tion should be defined as primary and secondary end points
in all clinical trials. In accordance with the current consensus
definitions, measures of personal distress should be included
with other quality of life measures, which in most instances
will serve as important secondary end points. Physiological
end points, such as vaginal photoplethysmography or vaginal
ultrasound, are of potential value in investigations of drug
dosages or mechanisms of action. When such measures are
used, emphasis needs to be placed on the conditions of stim-
ulation and laboratory setting in which the research is con-
ducted. Further research is urgently needed on the sensitiv-
ity and reliability of patient based and physiological
measures of sexual response in women.
1999 Consensus Classification System
I. Sexual desire disorders:
A. Hypoactive sexual desire disorder
B. Sexual aversion disorder
II. Sexual arousal disorder
III. Orgasmic disorder
IV. Sexual pain disorders:
A. Dyspareunia
B. Vaginismus
C. Other sexual pain disorders
REFERENCES
1. Laumann, E. O., Paik. A. and Rosen, R. C.: Sexual dysfunction in
the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA, 10: 281:
537, 1999
2. Vroege, J. A., Gijs, L. and Hengeveld, M. W.: Classification of
sexual dysfunctions: towards DSM-V and ICD-11. Compr Psy-
chiatry, 39: 333, 1998
3. Leiblum, S. R.: Definition and classification of female sexual
disorders. Int J Impot Res, suppl., 10: S104, 1998
4. World Health Organization: ICD-10: International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. World
Health Organization: Geneva, 1992
5. American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Sta-
tistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington,
D. C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1994
6. Masters, W. H. and Johnson, V. E.: Human Sexual Response.
Boston: Little Brown, 1966
7. Masters, W. H. and Johnson, V. E.: Human Sexual Inadequacy.
Boston: Little Brown, 1970
8. Kaplan, H. S.: Disorders of Sexual Desire. New York: Brunner/
Mazel, 1979
9. Lief, H. I.: Inhibited sexual desire. Med Aspects Hum Sex, 7: 94,
1977
10. Segraves, K. B. and Segraves, R. T.: Hypoactive sexual desire
disorder: prevalence and comorbidity in 906 subjects. J Sex
Marital Ther, 17: 55, 1991
11. Rosen, R. C., Taylor, J. F., Leiblum, S. R. et al: Prevalence of
sexual dysfunction in women: results of a survey study of 329
women in an outpatient gynecological clinic. J Sex Marital
Ther, 19: 171, 1993
12. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on
Impotence: Impotence. JAMA, 270: 83, 1993
13. The Process of Care Consensus Panel: The process of care model
for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J
Impot Res, 11: 59, 1999
14. Kahn, K. L., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M. R. et al.: Measuring the
clinical appropriateness of the use of a procedure. Can we do
it? Med Care, 26: 415, 1988
15. Brook, R. H., Chassin, M. R., Fink, A. et al.: A method for the
detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technol-
ogies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2: 53, 1986
16. Derogatis, L. R. and Melisaratos, N.: The DSFI: a multidimen-
sional measure of sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther, 5:
244, 1979
17. Taylor, J. F., Rosen, R. C. and Leiblum, S. R.: Self-report assess-
ment of female sexual function: psychometric evaluation of the
Brief Index of Sexual Function for Women. Arch Sex Behav,
23: 627, 1994
CONCLUSIONS
We considered the previous diagnostic systems proposed
by the DSM-IV and ICD-10, used a modified Delphi method
for determining the appropriateness of each category and
definition, and expanded definitions to include physical as
well as psychological causes of female sexual dysfunction.
Although the 4 major categories of desire, arousal, orgasmic
and sexual pain disorders in the DSM-IV were retained,
several changes were made in the specific definitions and
criteria for each diagnosis, including use of a personal dis-