Scheme 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, Et2O, -78 °C, then 10, 62%; (b) Dess-Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, rt, 88%; (c) (+)-DIP-Cl,
THF, -20 °C, 75%; (d) Pd(OAc)2, Et3N, (n-Bu)4NBr, MeCN, H2O, 75 °C, 75%; (e) TBDPSCl, imid., DMAP, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 98%; (f) (1)
9-BBN, THF, reflx., (2) EtOH, NaOH, H2O2, rt, 81%; (g) I2, PPh3, imid., THF, 0 °C f rt, 90%; (h) t-BuLi, Et2O, -78 °C, then (2-
thienyl)Cu(CN)Li, THF, then 7, BF3‚OEt2, -40 °C, 50%.
molecular Heck reaction to yield a 5.1:1 mixture of dia-
stereomers.10 Finally, in three steps, the major diastereomer
12 was further elaborated to iodide 13.
transformation either directly16 or with several R-acylated
derivatives of 14. The reaction suffers, presumably, from the
steric congestion afforded by the adjacent quaternary carbon
center.
The two fragments were then coupled through a challeng-
ing cuprate conjugate addition (see Scheme 3).11 In this event,
lithiation of iodide 13 was followed by treatment with lithium
2-thienylcyanocuprate.12 The resulting mixed, higher-order
heterocuprate was treated with cyclopentenone 7 in the
presence of boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3‚OEt2) to
furnish 14. Similar yields were achieved with the Gilman
cuprate derived from copper(I) iodide and 3,3-dimethyl-
butyne as the dummy ligand.13 Again, the use of BF3‚OEt2
was indispensable for efficient addition of this cuprate to
the hindered cyclopentenone. Unfortunately, the additive
precluded interception of the enolate as the silyl enol ether.
Encouraged by previous model studies, we next sought
to unravel the furan in 14 and form the central seven-
membered ring via a rhodium-catalyzed cyclopropanation/
rearrangement reaction.14 Our efforts toward the elaboration
of 14 to the required diazo ketone 15, however, were met
with little success.15 Using various sulfonyl azides as diazo
transfer reagents, we were unable to effect the desired
The difficulty associated with making diazo compound 15
led us to consider alternatives for forming the central seven-
membered ring. We realized that coupling of the nucleophilic
furan to the enol form of the cyclopentanone moiety would
require some form of “umpolung”, most easily achieved by
oxidation of one of these components to the corresponding
radical cation. To this end, we turned our attention toward
the electrooxidative coupling of silyl enol ethers and furans.
This methodology, developed by the groups of Moeller17a,b
and Wright,17c-e has been used in the preparation of several
annulated furans, including a key intermediate in the
synthesis of the natural product (-)-alliacol A.17b Very
recently, Wright showed that a gem-dialkyl effect is required
for the efficient formation of seven-membered rings,18
rendering our system ideal for the implementation of this
methodology.
Formation of the kinetic enolate of ketone 14 in the
presence of tert-butyldimethylsilyl triflate (TBSOTf) cleanly
gave silyl enol ether 16 (Scheme 4). This material was then
dissolved in a dichloromethane/methanol mixture and sub-
(10) (a) Kwon, O.; Su, D.-S.; Meng, D.; Deng, W.; D’Amico, D. C.;
Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1880. For reviews,
see: (b) Link, J. T.; Overman, L. E. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany,
1998; Chapter 6, p 231.
(11) Ibuka, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Organocopper Reagents: A Practical
Approach; Taylor, R. J. K., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1994;
Chapter 7, p 143.
(15) (a) Regitz, M. Synthesis 1972, 351. (b) Regitz, M.; Maas, G. Diazo
Compounds: Properties and Synthesis; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, 1986;
Chapter 13, p 326. (c) Doyle, M. P.; McKervey, M. A.; Ye, T. Modern
Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds: From
Cyclopropanes to Ylides; Wiley: New York, 1998; Chapter 1, p 1.
(16) For example, see: Evans, D. A.; Britton, T. C.; Ellman, J. A.;
Dorow, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4011.
(12) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Koerner, M.; Parker, D. A. Tetrahedron Lett.
1987, 28, 945. (b) Lipshutz, B. H. Synthesis 1987, 325.
(13) Corey, E. J.; Beames, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7210.
(14) (a) Padwa, A.; Wisnieff, T. J.; Walsh, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1986,
51, 5036. (b) Padwa, A.; Wisnieff, T. J.; Walsh, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 299. (c) Wenkert, E.; Guo, M.; Pizzo, F.; Ramachandran, K. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1987, 70, 1429. (d) Wenkert, E.; Decorzant, R.; Na¨f, F. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1989, 72, 756. (e) Wenkert, E.; Guo, M.; Lavilla, R.; Porter, B.;
Ramachandran, K.; Sheu, J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6203. (f) Davies,
H. M. L.; McAfee, M. J.; Oldenburg, C. E. M. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54,
930. (g) Davies, H. M. L.; Calvo, R. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5623.
(17) (a) Mihelcic, J.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 36.
(b) Mihelcic, J.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9106. (c)
Wright, D. L.; Whitehead, C. R.; Sessions, E. H.; Ghiviriga, I.; Frey, D. A.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1535. (d) Whitehead, C. R.; Sessions, E. H.; Ghiviriga,
I.; Wright, D. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3763. (e) Sperry, J. B.; Whitehead, C.
R.; Ghiviriga, I.; Walczak, R. M.; Wright, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
3726. For a review of anodic electrochemistry, see: (f) Moeller, K. D.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 9527.
(18) Sperry, J. B.; Wright, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8034.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 16, 2005
3427